tutta la scienza è dominata dalla idea di approssimazione
Joined December 2019
- Tweets1K
- Following467
- Followers367
- Likes71.1K
AC46 retweeted
@Quirinale E poi li finivano con Midazolam e Morfina. Sapevatelo.
AC46 retweeted
Venti assenti della Lega e ventidue assenti di Forza Italia.
Magari chiedo @Grok di dirci i nomi; visto che tornano le preferenze, la cosa puō essere utile per chi li vota.
Nonostante le urla, le interruzioni, gli insulti, Futuro Nazionale ha fermato la furia giacobina di comunisti e cinque stelle che volevano ancora una volta punire quei medici che si erano ribellati alle imposizioni di Conte e Speranza durante il Covid, radiati dall'ordine e licenziati.
Non solo: grazie al voto di Futuro Nazionale, la maggioranza di centrodestra non è andata sotto, tra i 20 assenti della Lega e i 22 di Forza Italia il Governo sarebbe caduto, quindi ufficialmente Futuro Nazionale ha salvato il Governo Meloni.
Sui temi identitari, sul bene della Nazione, nella tutela degli Italiani e contro la polizia del pensiero unico e del politicamente corretto, Futuro Nazionale non si tirerà mai indietro.
Giorgia Meloni si guardi in casa anzichè attaccare il Generale Vannacci.
AC46 retweeted
This video caused Minnesota to charge me with a felony.
Watch it, they’re afraid of it.
🚨🚨 “NO ID REQUIRED for you and your 8 friends”
I dressed as a Muslim woman and Minneapolis poll workers were prepared to allow me an an army of other foreigners fraudulently vote without verifying who any of us are.
Full video: youtu.be/b66uFfWWsL4?is=zJ5p…
AC46 retweeted
Volevate uccidermi. Soffro di una malattia autoimmune che non era prevista dal protocollo Speranza per l'esenzione. L'ho avuta grazie al coraggio del mio medico curante, altrimenti avrei fatto la fine di David Sassoli.
Non credo che potrò dimenticare. Mai. Un crimine immane.
AC46 retweeted
I stand with @TRobinsonNewEra
Fuck the British government 🤡
AC46 retweeted
🚨 RETIRED MILITARY VET JUST DROPPED THE REALEST LINE OF THE ENTIRE CAMPAIGN OUTSIDE TRUMP’S LUBBOCK RALLY:
“I love my freedoms. I love my country. We fought for it. They don’t understand what the heck is going on.
I’m retired military. I know what it’s like outside this country. This is what I’m fighting for now, to keep Texas RED so we can keep our freedoms.
That’s what’s at stake. And James Talarico is NOT going to protect your rights.”
This is the energy. This is the stakes. One week left. 🇺🇸
AC46 retweeted
🚨 JUST NOW: Thousands of Patriots in Ohio went absolutely wild the moment Vivek walked in 🔥
OHIO IS MAGA COUNTRY
VOTE FOR VIVEK 👏
AC46 retweeted
🚨 This needs more attention. Poll Watcher in New York City says she was removed before the ballots were sealed. She says election officials kicked out all the poll watchers, even called to have them removed. They would not seal the ballots and wouldn’t close the voting machines
“Something very sketchy happened while I was poll watching in the Bronx. I was closing a location, and at first I thought everything was fine. I had checked the numbers, and the number of voters who signed in matched the number of ballots scanned — I was just really pleased and getting ready to go home. And then I noticed something really weird.
Which was that all of the poll workers were checking out and going home and the voting machines were still open. They were unlocked, unsealed, and the ballots hadn't been taken out yet. Now, this is very strange.
I've been poll watching in New York City since 2021, and I've never seen that happen. The procedure is that every voting machine has a poll worker assigned to it, and at the end of the night, each individual poll worker closes down their voting machine, seals it, and takes the ballots out and seals the ballots. And the ballots and the voting machines were totally unsealed.
So I just sat down and waited to see them take the ballots out and seal them. And then the coordinator started getting really like antsy and nervous, and they were like, you're all done, you got your numbers, you can go. And they actually got on the phone and called the deputy chief clerk who told me that I had to leave. And I said, no, I'm a poll watcher. I'm supposed to stay until the ballots are sealed and the police pick them up — They finally took the ballots out of the machine and put them in bags on the floor. And I said, they're not sealed.
And then they got the seals out and they put the seals on. I said, can I see the seal numbers? They said no. I said, did you check the seal number on the paperwork and initial it? She said yes. I said, can I see it? She said no”
“A guy named Charles, to close down the voting machines by himself. And I said, the voting machines aren't sealed. And he said, I'm sealing them, but he wasn't”
This means after all the poll watchers leave, Democrats could easily introduce any additional ballots they wanted to and also change the ballots in there
In New York the law says poll watchers are specifically authorized to observe the unlocking, examination and related sealing steps for voting machines and ballot boxes
It’s 2020 all over again. This will keep happening because no one ever gets held accountable for stealing our elections
We need federal intervention. Everyone involved should be going to prison
AC46 retweeted
Somali scumbag Fahima Mahamud pleads GUILTY to $3million daycare fraud in Minneapolis.
Naturally, she tried to flee to London before being arrested by the FBI. Nick Shirley deserves the Pulitzer Prize for journalism.
AC46 retweeted
African attacks a WHITE native man & the Police/ Security detain & arrest the WHITE guy in the UK.
We see this same thing happen over & over again yet where is the major pushback against the racial targeting of White people & the two tier policing?
Why do people in the West tolerate this?
AC46 retweeted
For those that haven't been following the Tommy Robinson story... it's INSANE he was convicted of anything.
Back in August 2024 Tommy is on a family holiday in Cyprus posting about the riots, and the Daily Mail decides this is so important it sends a reporter and a photographer all the way to the island to find him, and according to Tommy they even took a photograph of his ex-wife, and then the story goes up and, as he told the jury, within hours people online were posting the name of the hotel he was staying at and telling others to head there, with his kids right there, so his family had to move to a different part of the hotel after he spoke to security, and he ended up leaving the hotel altogether...
...and so what does Tommy do?
He does the exact same thing back to them.
He finds out who wrote it, he hires investigators to locate them, he goes public with it and accuses one of the journalists of “doxxing my children’s location”, he rings one of them up and basically asks whether it would be OK if he did to them what they had done to him, which is literally the whole point, he’s holding up a mirror, and he told the court all he wanted was to question them on camera, the way reporters door-step people every single day, and that it was an attempt to bring the Daily Mail to the table, and even the prosecutor admitted none of it contained direct threats of violence, and yet the people who flew to another country to find him at his hotel are pretending they are the victims, and the man who found where they live and asked them how it feels is the criminal, and the jury couldn’t even agree, it was 10 to 2, and he’s going to be sentenced on December 16 for doing to the Daily Mail exactly what the Daily Mail did to him first, and we’re all supposed to just nod along like this makes perfect sense!!!!!!!
It's PURE INSANITY!!!!!!!
AC46 retweeted
🚨 ELECTION UPDATE: President Trump is calling on everyone to start voting early now in Oklahoma
TIME TO GET LOUD
AC46 retweeted
Senza farla tanto lunga, la vicenda della scarcerazione di uno che scriveva quello che tutti hanno letto paragonata ad altre sentenze, ad altri provvedimenti, ad altre decisioni, deve servire a tutti a chiarire che non esiste la "giustizia" ma soltanto la "forza".
Chi ha la forza la esercita e chiama le proprie scelte "giustizia".
La società umana funziona così.
AC46 retweeted
caro Presidente #Mattarella perché tace e non fa mea culpa? @Quirinale Ormai sappiamo quanti morti, e quanti effetti avversi, eppure aveete avallato con la #Sciarra la distruzione di principi costituzionali. E ANCORA HA IL CORAGGIO DI DIFENDERE I VACCINI???
la #commissionecovid ha portato a galla tante verità che hanno smentito la pseudo scienza che ha gestito il covid. Tra ignoranza e dolo, perchè tanti sono stati pagati per piegarsi alla narrazione, oggi sappiamo che le cure c'erano, il greenpass era un abominio anticostituzionale
"Quello che succedeva violava le convenzioni di Norimberga, Helsinky e Oviedo che pure l’Italia aveva firmato. Chiedevamo di poter decidere del nostro corpo senza perdere il diritto di lavorare, e ripetevamo i dati che già c’erano ed erano inoppugnabili sul fatto che la malattia fosse curabile con le cure corrette, che il vaccino fosse inutile per fermarla e troppo pericoloso. La risposta dello Stato non fu l’ascolto. Fu la punizione. Il dottor Fauci si è avvalso per 111 volte della facoltà di non rispondere: rispondo io al posto suo: tutta la narrazione che giustificava l’obbligo vaccinale era falsa"
AC46 retweeted
🚨🇧🇷 I DUG DEEPER INTO THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT’S RECORDS, AND I DISCOVERED WHO INITIATED THE PETITION THAT HAS LED TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON FLÁVIO BOLSONARO’S PASSPORT!
Remember how the Federal Police submitted a request to seize Flávio Bolsonaro’s passports just SEVEN MINUTES after Lula’s election victory was confirmed?
Well, I started digging into the STF’s records and found something else.
On October 19, SIX DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION, a petition was filed under case number PET 16952.
The applicant listed in the court records is Luiz Lindbergh Farias Filho (@lindberghfarias), a politician from Lula’s socialist party (PT). The respondent is Willer Tomaz de Souza, a lawyer associated with Flávio Bolsonaro.
On October 23, two days before the election, the case was assigned to Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, not through a random lottery, but through a procedure called distribuição por prevenção, meaning Moraes was considered responsible because of an earlier related proceeding.
And here’s where things get insane.
Lindbergh had also reportedly requested investigative measures involving Flávio Bolsonaro and Willer Tomaz. On October 23, Moraes ordered financial restrictions against Tomaz.
Then, on October 25, the very night Lula’s election victory was confirmed, the Federal Police requested restrictions on Flávio Bolsonaro’s passports in another proceeding, PET 16877.
The Federal Police reportedly used Flávio’s relationship with Willer Tomaz and concerns about Tomaz leaving Brazil as part of its justification.
But here’s another detail: according to reporting, the bank Santander had already informed Moraes that Flávio had never been registered as a user of a bank account that had raised investigators’ suspicions.
And yet the passport request proceeded that evening.
Now try to examine the underlying judicial documents.
ACCESS DENIED.
PET 16952 is classified under Segredo de Justiça. Even a Brazilian lawyer attempting to access its restricted documents without authorization receives an access-denied message.
We can see the filing dates. We can see the parties. We can see that Moraes received the case before the election.
But we cannot examine the documents needed to establish precisely how these proceedings were connected, what evidence was submitted, or why particular measures were considered necessary.
And that is precisely the problem.
The Brazilian Supreme Court is supposed to serve the Brazilian people. Judicial secrecy may be legally justified in some circumstances, but that cannot eliminate the need for accountability.
How are Brazilians supposed to scrutinize the actions of their highest court when crucial documents are inaccessible?
Who initiated these requests? Which earlier proceeding justified Moraes’s assignment? How exactly did PET 16952 relate to PET 16877? And what evidence ultimately justified the restrictions against Flávio Bolsonaro?
These are legitimate questions.
THE BRAZILIAN PEOPLE DESERVE ANSWERS, NOT JUST ANOTHER “ACESSO NEGADO.”
🚨🇧🇷 SEVEN MINUTES AFTER LULA’S ELECTION “VICTORY,” THE POLICE WERE ALREADY AFTER FLÁVIO BOLSONARO’S PASSPORT!
Look at this timeline:
9:09 PM: Brazil’s electoral court confirms Lula’s victory.
9:16 PM: Just SEVEN MINUTES later, the Federal Police digitally sign a 16-page (!!!) petition requesting the seizure of Flávio Bolsonaro’s passport.
That same night: Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes approves the request, without first consulting the Prosecutor General’s Office.
And guess who’s handling the case? Alexandre de Moraes. AGAIN!!!
Brazil has 11 Supreme Court justices. Cases are supposed to be assigned according to established rules, including electronic draws and existing jurisdiction. So why does Moraes keep handling almost all Bolsonaro-related cases?
I wanted to look at the original police petition to find out WHO actually requested this, who authorized it within the Federal Police, and when it was prepared.
But guess what? The entire proceeding, PET 16877, is marked CONFIDENTIAL.
So the public cannot inspect the original petition or establish who inside the Federal Police initiated the request.
Who gave the order? When was the document prepared? And why was Moraes the judge handling it?
These are questions that deserve answers.
