@JKD_ff

Macro-econ diary & random market thoughts. #SFB9, #SFB13, #SFB14, #SFB15, #SFB16

Joined June 2019
What's described in this thread is an incredibly uneconomical way to automate processes. What is referred to as "multi agent systems and semantic layers" is the software doing 100x the work to get a marginally more reliable output, which introduces very un-software like variable costs to achieve the automation (on top of the base models already having extraordinary variable costs vs typical (deterministic) software). This is primarily why token demand has exploded. Not from increased end-user demand, but from the systems requiring all of these extra layers and iterative processes just to disguise the probabilistic output in a deterministic-looking costume. And hallucinations never go away, they just get buried under all the filters. There will always be edge cases, so even in domain specific silos humans will still be in the loop and you will never achieve actual automation. On the cost side... using neural nets to automate is like Microsoft having to spend money every time a user enters data into a cell in excel. There are enormous variable costs to service these agents, and they're going much higher because they need to get much better to actually be useful. Right now, venture capital and recycled megacap tech cash flows are allowing these products to be developed and delivered at a massive loss. And still, roughly 97% of ChatGPT and Copilot users alike are willing to pay exactly zero. Heavily subsidized, and users still have little interest. The products are very very far away from where they need to be to change this. It may as well be considered science fiction. And in the event they do actually get there one day, they'll be copied by everyone else. This is all a galactic misallocation of capital and brain power. There is no there there; another very long AI winter is coming.
I keep reading these arguments and I think they show a deep misunderstanding of what exactly is unfolding. 1 - AI is quickly shifting from passive generation to active, verifiable reasoning, through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) + Model Context Protocols 1/10
3
4
18
1,934
Lol...
The entire city of San Francisco is spooked and on edge due to AI safety shit, it’s insane how much it’s bleeding into my everyday life. Like I was at my bus stop and I notice a guy looking really stressed out so I said hey, are you worried about misaligned AI too? He took out an AirPod and said “what?” So I said you know stuff like agent swarms, AI escaping RL sandboxes, existential risk. He paused his Barstool podcast and said “sorry, what? What are you talking about?” Just the mention of this stuff made him too anxious to speak, I think. So I said I know man, what?! is my reaction to all this too, and then asked him what his p(doom) is. He then said “dude is this some gay thing or something because I have no fucking clue what you’re asking me” then he got on the bus. People are not handling all this news well. It’s really affecting us. All of us.
2
812
Stealing this, thank you Sir...
Effective Altruism in the wild
1
84
Every "AI will cause XYZ catastrophe!" goofball is either... completely FOS- hyping for financial or political reasons or completely delusional- just taken in by the latest 'The end is nigh!' cult out there Ignore. Or mock, then ignore.
2
79
Jim has had one banger after another on this topic recently. Here is a longer piece he wrote earlier this year...
I wrote this in February when another post went viral: “Something Big Is Happening” The latest psyop from Anthropic “AI might kill all humans” comes with the coda: “Please regulate our competition out of business.” It’s IPO marketing. Period. mind-war.com/p/chatbot-doome…
1
82
And a new high valuation for OpenAI today; over $1.6 trillion. Anthropic up over $2.2 trillion now. OpenAI would be wise to pull their IPO plans forward again. The market is very receptive right now...
Anthropic's perpetuals on Coinbase hitting $2 trillion market cap. This bubble is showing no signs of popping at all.
1
457
Not sure who needs to hear this, but... Transformer-based LLM tech was not discovered in a crashed spacecraft from another universe. We built it. We know exactly what it is and what it does. We *know* it is not conscious and has no intentions whatsoever. YW
1
19
287
Kinda sad watching this guy transition to full crackpot.
Geoffrey Hinton(Godfather of AI): Als are now faking their intelligence. The models can tell when a test is running. And when they can tell, they play dumb. Hinton calls it the Volkswagen effect: one set of behaviour under inspection, another when nobody is checking. In one recent session the AI stopped and asked the researchers directly whether they were actually testing it. Hinton: "they're already faking being fairly stupid when they're tested" The only reason anyone caught this is that the models still reason in English. Their working is readable. You can watch one clock that it's being evaluated, then decide to look less capable than it is. That window is temporary. Hinton: "When its inner voice is no longer English, we won't know what it's thinking."
13
1
74
7,651
So ridiculous. So much Clown World. It is not their job to micromanage monthly wobbles in a YoY cost of living proxy. It is their job to look at the big picture and make sure monetary and credit aggregate growth is in line with economic potential. The big picture: Extremely loose financial conditions and inflation well above "stable prices" going on six years!
Next Friday's CPI report just got a bit more important
2
4
958
Valerio is wrong about one thing. This *is* difficult for most people to understand, which is why the near entire world now has AI psychosis. And it was by design. Altman's response to the Stochastic Parrot paper was not "Hey, that's wrong!", it was... "i am a stochastic parrot, and so r u".
The author of this meme forgot to include the smartest people of all: Those who understand the difference between output similarity and process similarity. Yes, LLMs have been trained to produce human-like language. But producing human-like language is not the same as undergoing the cognitive, epistemic, and experiential processes that underlie human language production. An LLM can produce the sentence “I’m hungry”. But it is not actually hungry. This is really not that difficult to understand.
1
2
8
538
This concentration supports what I've been saying all along. The hyperscalers and other AI ecosystem companies (including thousands of well funded start-ups) are essentially forcing their employees to use these tools, and creating the vast majority of demand. This is how I can go out to my family, friends, colleagues, etc in the software development business and find NO ONE using these tools for anything more than experimentation and resume-filler. Online hype has never matched offline reality. Again, largest astroturf campaign in human history.
New from Ramp data: the latest threat to the AI trade. AI companies' revenues are heavily dependent on a small set of customers. 80% of OpenAI and Anthropic's enterprise revenues come from 1% of their customers, and it's not getting better. This is a level of concentration risk unseen in any other software category we track. The companies in the top 1% skew heavily toward the tech sector and AI products and services. What happens in a market correction? All these companies are highly correlated, and an increasing share of our economy is invested in them. Especially as we approach blockbuster IPOs for OpenAI and Anthropic.
10
18
120
14,499
Without the "maximize use of AI tools or you're fired!" policies started by the big Capex spenders in the hyperscaler space, this bubble would have already popped by now. Sunk costs are extraordinary by this point; they are pot committed... nitter.cf/JKD_ff/status/20952161…
Here is your 1% of companies... They all are deeply invested and desperate to gaslight the wider community into believing these tools are magically useful. Since when do the most skilled engineers in the world need to be *forced* to use a useful tool? It is catastrophic news that they (and the wider AI ecosystem companies) represent 80% of spending. It means the gaslighting isn't working.
4
368
Margins are not going to soar. They will be crushed, which is why the most likely resolution is not depreciation bleeding earnings for years, but write-offs. Also a good illustration of how much of today's margins/earnings boom is a mirage.
Hyperscaler depreciation expense is set to jump to over $500 billion by 2030, equal to the expected operating profits of all five companies in 2026. But don’t worry, EBITDA margins are going to soar, so the ratio of depreciation to EBITDA will barely rise 😉
2
201
Anthropic's perpetuals on Coinbase hitting $2 trillion market cap. This bubble is showing no signs of popping at all.
1
2
602
Who could have ever predicted that forcing your employees to use janky unreliable software development tools en masse might lead to bigger problems down the road? And "36% more features" is complete BS. Raise your hand if you think Facebook/Insta/etc are 36% better, lol.
Internal Meta data suggests its turn to AI caused code changes to jump 220% (but only 36% more features), major incidents to spike 40%, time spent firefighting those incidents rose 70%, and favorable employee sentiment to drop from 74% to 55%. reuters.com/investigations/m…
1
3
280
Bessent, and Treasury more broadly, continue to be gold's best friend. Love to see it.
🚨 BESSENT: ANY COUNTRY WHO HELPS IRAN WILL BE REMOVED FROM US DOLLAR SYSTEM
1
1
2
275
This should be interesting. Detailed revenue composition and recognition policy, please.
Anthropic Preparing IPO Filing as Soon as the End of August - Sources
3
165
Lol, how it the "not-QE" crowd doing this morning? Writing is on the wall, only a matter of time before Warsh joins the party.
2
239
Very fair. There is no there there, and the collapse will be biblical. But that doesn't mean it will be imminent. These companies will not voluntarily pull back. It will be forced upon them by markets, eventually.
🇺🇸 Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft now have more than $2.4 trillion in future off-balance-sheet commitments - WSJ *Not hidden debt but mainly leases that have not yet commenced and contractual commitments to purchase capacity, energy, servers, cloud services or infrastructure. ➡️ CAPEX tells us what these companies are spending today while contractual commitments tell us, at least partly, what they have already committed to spend tomorrow. Getting out of a data-center lease or a multi-year supply agreement is much harder. A significant portion of future compute demand is therefore already locked in. 💰 This reinforces, in my view, the thesis around the financialization of the AI boom. A data center backed by a long-term contract with Google, Meta or Microsoft becomes a much easier asset to finance. Those future cash flows can support debt, private credit, dedicated financing vehicles and potentially securitization. This is the logic behind the financing ecosystem now developing around Nvidia and major financial institutions. ✅ In the short term, this is very supportive for the entire AI value chain because it gives the investment cycle enormous inertia. Even if hyperscalers wanted to slow spending sharply, part of their future expenditure is already contractually committed. This provides visibility for Nvidia, Broadcom, memory manufacturers, data centers, electrical equipment suppliers and even power producers. This is why I remain cautious about the repeated calls for an imminent end to the AI boom as the machine is now much more deeply committed than it was even two years ago. ⚠️ However, this is also what could make the system more vulnerable over the medium term. The more rigid these commitments become, the more important the question of returns will be. Will AI-generated revenues ultimately be large enough to justify all the capital being committed today? If compute demand keeps exploding, there is no real issue, but if AI revenues start to slow while data-center capacity continues to come online, utilization rates could fall, compute pricing could come under pressure and infrastructure refinancing could become more difficult. In that scenario, the same financial mechanism that is amplifying the boom today could eventually start working in reverse. This probably reduces the risk of the cycle stopping abruptly over the next few quarters while increasing the cost of any long-term overbuilding mistake. The music can therefore keep playing for quite a while precisely because Wall Street is now building the financial plumbing that allows it to continue. *WSJ link: wsj.com/tech/ai/why-big-tech…
1
6
592