Jason Robertson

Anarchotyranny is perhaps the most destructive force on the planet One imagines a hydrogen bomb would do less damage to Portland than decades of leftist rule, where one both gets taxed to death and gets nothing for it, as the city operates purely for the benefit of the criminal underclass and its welfare-gulping dependents South Africa is what this looks like at national scale

Democrats are now going with the line that law enforcement is “white supremacist” This shows what they think “white supremacy” is, which is the imposition of order and opposing entropy They hate that you might be able to stop a crackhead from chasing your daughter down the street with a cleaver, or that the police might do anything other than let him do so Such is what their quest for global Zimbabwe looks like at the ground level: police are evil if they evict the druggie squatter, or arrest the violent vagrant, for that imposition of order is “white supremacy”

Jimmy Carter was probably the worst president America has ever had He almost lost the Cold War by being so pro-Third World and willing to work with the communists, as shown by his destruction of Rhodesia and refusal to stop the advance of communistic leftism in South America or elsewhere in Southern Africa He gave up the Panama Canal, pardoned the draft dodgers, did nothing about the Weather Underground/FALN terrorists, let America fall apart under the ravages of inflation and crime, and did nothing to punish Iran for holding our embassy personnel hostage for over a year (he should have hit Tehran with a hydrogen bomb) He loved the Third World so much he let America briefly become a Third World country, and he advanced communism abroad as he did so An awful president, and awful man theamericantribune.news/p/wh…

"Why does nobody run for the school board?" "Why are the Rotary clubs empty?" "Why does every town meeting feel like it's run by the same motley assortment of terrible people?" Because the men who ought be doing so--the successful local men of prominence, typically businessmen and lawyers--came to the conclusion in the mid-20th century that participation in and leadership of civic life was someone else's job. This is the desire of the so-called conservative to simply "work" rather than do all the other things that keep entropy at bay and ensure things function. Their doing so left open the field to the worst among us: spiteful malcontents It wasn't always like this. The planters of the Virginia gentry served as vestryman, justice, militia officer and burgess, usually before he turned thirty and usually for no pay, other than perhaps having some travel expenses covered as a burgess. It was expected of him, and he expected it of himself: as a man whose success made him privileged, he was duty-bound to be the one to show up and lead That habit can come back. It ought come back. It starts with showing up to the boring meeting, and being the sort of man to whom others listen. The sort of man whose reputation for success and competence, and cultivated but not overdone and always aesthetically pleasing look makes others want to follow him This is what the great men we look back to did, and is indeed what their whole soceity was geared toward producing: great men who were great leaders at every level of civic life, from the humblest station at the bottom to the greatest at the top Re-engaging in that way will be critical if we are to retake our country. Read more about what we can learn from the Virginia gentry here: theamericantribune.news/p/ho…

Race communism with Islamic characteristics is increasingly prevalent across the West due to Muslim mass migration, demographic change, and the politics of envy It must be defeated