Han 한 🍓🔪

So my crashout is that all LLMs are Gen AI, and the effort to define art as "gen AI" and the rest of LLM work as "okay AI" is insulting, self-centered, and hypocritical. Generating writing, including coding, is generative AI. quite literally. It is generating text and code. If your argument is that the ONLY line of work that should be immune to AI is art, I don't know what to tell you. Like are you arguing that spending time to learn drawing is enriching but learning architecture, writing, engineering, marketing, analytics have no inherent value for your mind and are fine to pass off to machines? "No no, we WANT to automate tasks we don't want to do, that's different" as though there aren't millions of people and businesses that don't WANT to make art, they just want it to be made fast, cheap, and "good enough". Sound familiar? "But programmers embrace AI" well let me tell you a few things. First, not all of them, and/or we're starting to see some of the (IMO obvious) problems with it. Second of all... I have bad news about programmers who embrace AI. They also are more likely to embrace AI in the areas you think they shouldn't... because they already don't care. They care about the speed and output.