@JasonD60

Advocate for legalising voluntary assisted dying and proportional representation in the UK. Supports @MDMDMyDecision and @MakeVotesMatter.

Brighton, England
Joined October 2012
Evangelical Christians are developing a blood lust like never before.
🚨 WOW! SecWar Pete Hegseth just announced the firing squad execution of Fort Hood Islamist terrorist Nidal Hasan will be **PUBLIC** At the SAME time and place where Hasan carried out the attack. "We'll make sure that people are able to watch it. That it's public. Because people need to understand that there's serious consequences for these types of things!" "He's gonna get a firing squad of soldiers. As it should be." @JackPosobiec: Did he make any final requests? HEGSETH: "Don't care. We'll see him on December 3rd." 🥶 Hasan m*rdered 13 people at Fort Hood in 2009 while yelling "Allahu Akbar" and wounded more than 30 others He was sentenced to death in 2013 and then sat on death row for over a DECADE. The Acting Sec. of the Army made it official The victims' families finally get JUSTICE 🙏🏻 Our SecWar is stone COLD when it comes to traitors like this who take American lives. @RealAmVoice
14
The campaign to legalise assisted dying crosses political divides too.
One of the most beautiful aspects of the campaign against #assistedsuicide is that involved Marxists, Reform, Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour members, disability activists, Muslims, Jews, born-again Christians, and atheists. And it was a great pleasure to work with all of them.
12
Opponents of assisted dying are spinning this as evidence that life ending drugs are unreliable, but it should be noted that drug manufacturers refuse to supply pentobarbital for the death penalty, and States therefore procure from secretive, substandard sources.
1
92
Assisted dying is an arrangement between a patient and their doctors. Care homes and hospitals should not have the right to block this lawful interaction in the name of "religious freedom". Zurich reinforces this principle. swissinfo.ch/eng/demographic…
1
72
Jason Dixon retweeted
Two weeks on from the assisted dying vote, so what is the plan @andyburnham ? To every MP who voted against the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, and to those who campaigned so loudly against it, what happens now? I have asked many MPs and opponents this directly, but I have yet to receive an answer. Since September 11th, I have been contacted by hundreds of terminally ill people, devastated that their choice has been denied, frightened of the deaths they may face, and deeply aware that their suffering was dismissed throughout this debate. That suffering did not disappear when the vote was lost. We were repeatedly told that palliative and end of life care must be fixed first. Andy Burnham stated that social and palliative care funding needed overhaul before this debate could happen. So when will palliative care be properly funded and accessible to everyone who needs it? And what is the plan for those whom palliative care, however excellent, cannot adequately relieve their pain? Terminally ill adults have been left in a broken cruel status quo. Many families will still be left helpless and traumatized, watching loved ones suffer. This is not scaremongering, it is the daily reality faced by many living with a terminal illness. To those who argued the Bill was not safe enough, what safeguards would you support? What does a safe law look like to you? It is not enough to reject the only option put before Parliament, call it unsafe, and offer no solutions for the people left behind. You cannot simply walk away now that the vote is over. Our diagnoses haven’t changed, and neither have our fears. With more than 300 million people worldwide now having legal access to assisted dying, and more jurisdictions offering choice and changing their laws, what are you going to do? We deserve answers. You cannot leave terminally ill people to suffer in the shadows and simply walk away.
5
11
50
2,218
Q: AD1. The House of Commons recently voted to not pass a bill that would have legalised assisted dying for terminally ill adults. Do you think MPs made the right or wrong decision? NET: Right decision 27% NET: Wrong decision 53% Source: Opinium
2
2
140
It is. But also a chance to reconsider who should be allowed to apply for an assisted death. European countries allow for those who are incurably suffering to apply. We don't need another UK bill that assumes only the terminally ill can suffer unbearably. @JamesMacCleary
“This is a personal tragedy for thousands of Britons. It is also a democratic scandal.” Simon Jenkins is right. The Assisted Dying Bill failed after months of obstruction in the Lords, followed by a Commons vote where too many MPs failed to meet the moment. ✍️ The Times
1
101
"It's not about the principle, it's about this bill". These "imperfect" PMBs will keep coming back and eventually succeed if government doesn't draft it's own legislation. It's time @andyburnham and this government stop ducking an issue that needs addressing. @JamesMacCleary
Replying to @BlackM1710
Well it’s literally my job to vote on what becomes the law. This isn’t about the principle either, it’s about the Bill as presented and it’s not good enough. The proposer has intimated amendments won’t be accepted as it’s the same bill as before post committee.
72
Interesting analysis of the failed assisted dying bill concludes that it is unsatisfactory to leave the issue to repeated Private Members Bills and that government should now address the issue themselves. @andyburnham instituteforgovernment.org.u…
1
72
Yes, supporters of assisted dying will fight on as there is a clear majority in @HouseofCommons who support assisted in principle if not Kim Leadbeater's bill in particular. So are MPs capable of delivering what is required or not? @JamesMacCleary observer.co.uk/news/politics…
10
1
12
823
So the Terminally Ill Adults bill falls. A significant number of those not voting in favour say they support assisted dying in principle but not this bill. Therefore parliamentarians must now find a satisfactory way to give people the choice they want. votes.parliament.uk/votes/co…
1
1
1
128
This being X, the assisted dying bill is regularly touted as some kind of Fabian Society plot. Funny then, that a strong opponent of the bill is a former Chair of said group.
Hi there, I’m not sure you understand Fabianism? I was Chair of the Fabians. They publish pamphlets and hold events on public policy and have always been committed to the safety net of the welfare state.
121
No doubt these 100+ peers and many others would like the opportunity to vote on the bill this time around, will the Parliament Acts finally encourage peers to see the bill to third reading?
NEW: 100+ peers have urged MPs to pass the assisted dying bill when it returns on Fri. They accuse a minority of peers of ‘filibustering’ last time and say Lords must complete scrutiny. They include former cabinet secretary Gus O’Donnell & Burnham’s political hero Neil Kinnock.
2
136
Come with Hannah to Parliament. This week, she travelled to Westminster to tell MPs why the assisted dying Bill matters to people like her. Hannah wants more time with her little boy. She also wants choice if her suffering becomes unbearable. On 11 September, MPs must show up.
10
11
5
22
18,108
Almost 2 years ago MPs voted in favour of a compassionate assisted dying law. People have not stopped wanting more choice over how they die, and I'm hoping this is once again recognised by MPs. @JamesMacCleary
If you support assisted dying, come and stand with us on Friday 11 September, from 8.30am in Parliament Square. We want every voting MP walking into the Commons to see just how many people are still waiting for change. RSVP: mydeath-mydecision.org.uk/20…
7
515
Was it these kinds of posts where Kevin suggests proponents of assisted dying champion Nazi policies which landed him in hot water with @sunderlanduni ?
Why does someone who apparently hates nazis celebrate a policy that was largely developed by... the nazis to get rid of the disabled, which its doing in Canada? Why is #euthanasia or other forms of eugenics a left wing cause?
227
Politics is about differences of opinion and is therefore necessarily "divisive". Politicians understand that even if da Costa does not.
And will that PM truly look with love and adoration at the Labour MPs that vote to plunge his administration back into a messy divisive battle but now with the Parliament Acts thrown in?
1
261
It's complete nonsense to suggest Labour MPs didn't have the freedom to vote how they chose last time.
“Burnham’s rejection of the covert whipping and influencing that took place under Kier Starmer. Burnham has given Ministers and Labour backbenchers the freedom to reject the Assisted Suicide Bill, as many of them would have done previously had they had that option.”
1
1
126