
Home for @jikkykjj the whistleblowing lab mouse #Modernagate #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG #3Tablets Pronouns: mouse/mouseself Tweets are public interest disclosures
Lexington, MA
Joined March 2022
- Tweets162K
- Following4.4K
- Followers117K
- Likes328K
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Biden's preemptive pardon for Fauci only covers Fauci's crimes from 2014 to 2024. Fauci killed 30,534 people (mostly gay men) in the 1980s by blocking access to the antibiotic Bactrim to create the market for AZT. Fauci should be arrested & prosecuted for those and other crimes.
During the AIDS crisis Dr. Fauci blocked access to the antibiotic Bactrim to create the market for AZT; 30,534 people then died from a treatable form of pneumonia.
In 2021, I received a lifetime ban from Twitter for stating this fact.
@elonmusk reinstated me. 60k followers now.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Replying to @Jikkyleaks @WakingUp2020
In this book, Sean Strub recounts how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Replying to @BillAckman
What’s the latest with Francesca Gino?
Her trial was so unfair and she appears to have been set up or scapegoated.
#GinoGate
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Asymmetric information has always been at the crux of the matter.
Incredibly damning testimony from Kristin Knouse in which she is forced confirm that she selectively released and excerpted texts with @DMSabatini to create a false impression about the nature of her relationship with him.
The Whitehead Institute relied on Knouse’s misleading production of texts in its investigation of Sabatini. The investigation and the investigative report were the basis for Sabatini’s dismissal from Whitehead, the elimination of his tenure at @MIT and his loss of funding from HHMI.
I have only one ask of these institutions:
Listen to this testimony and ask yourself why the Whitehead, MIT and HHMI should not be forced to revisit its findings and the resulting actions that resulted.
Institutional character and morality matters. You convicted Sabatini and destroyed him on the basis of false information provided to you.
How can you not revisit the harm that you have caused to David now that the facts are known and been confirmed by a jury of seven women and six men in a three week trial with the benefit of the actual evidence and testimony?
When a man is convicted of a crime that he did not convict based on false testimony, and the courts ultimately reverse the decision based on DNA evidence, he is released from prison and he receives compensation for the damage caused to him by the state.
As far as MIT, Whitehead and HHMI are concerned, David is still in prison. It is time that you release him.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Incredibly damning testimony from Kristin Knouse in which she is forced confirm that she selectively released and excerpted texts with @DMSabatini to create a false impression about the nature of her relationship with him.
The Whitehead Institute relied on Knouse’s misleading production of texts in its investigation of Sabatini. The investigation and the investigative report were the basis for Sabatini’s dismissal from Whitehead, the elimination of his tenure at @MIT and his loss of funding from HHMI.
I have only one ask of these institutions:
Listen to this testimony and ask yourself why the Whitehead, MIT and HHMI should not be forced to revisit its findings and the resulting actions that resulted.
Institutional character and morality matters. You convicted Sabatini and destroyed him on the basis of false information provided to you.
How can you not revisit the harm that you have caused to David now that the facts are known and been confirmed by a jury of seven women and six men in a three week trial with the benefit of the actual evidence and testimony?
When a man is convicted of a crime that he did not convict based on false testimony, and the courts ultimately reverse the decision based on DNA evidence, he is released from prison and he receives compensation for the damage caused to him by the state.
As far as MIT, Whitehead and HHMI are concerned, David is still in prison. It is time that you release him.
🤯
“I know what I want and I go after it.”
MeToo hoaxer Dr. Kristin Knouse gets grilled on her deliberate withholding of incriminating texts from the investigation into MIT professor David Sabatini—whose career and life Knouse destroyed with her false allegations. Knouse withheld texts that exposed her as a sexual aggressor.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
🚨 BOMBSHELL SWORN TESTIMONY EXPOSES A PREDETERMINED TERMINATION DECISION AT WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court-disclosed sworn testimony exposes that Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann (@REMLehmann) had communicated a decision to terminate Professor David M. Sabatini before he received the investigators' report and had an opportunity to respond to its findings.
The testimony comes from Professor Jonathan Weissman, a scientist affiliated with MIT, Whitehead Institute, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI).
In his June 3, 2024 deposition, Weissman described conversations with Lehmann immediately preceding @DMSabatini’s removal from Whitehead Institute (@WhiteheadInst) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (@hhmi_science) in August 2021.
THE TIMELINE REVEALED UNDER OATH IS EXTRAORDINARY.
🔴 1. THE DECISION TO TERMINATE — BEFORE SABATINI RECEIVED THE REPORT.
Weissman testified that Lehmann contacted him before the public announcement concerning Sabatini.
Describing what Lehmann communicated, Weissman stated:
🔴 “The gist of it was that they had gotten this report from Hinckley Allen, and that in light of it, they were going to fire David.”
The previously disclosed court-document analysis records that Sabatini received the investigative report on the afternoon of August 19, 2021, after Lehmann had communicated the termination decision to Weissman.
Weissman also testified that Whitehead had notified HHMI and that HHMI was expected to act first, affecting the timing of Whitehead's announcement.
🔴 2. THE TERMINATION WAS ALREADY BEING ARRANGED.
Weissman described the purpose of the meeting that Whitehead was preparing to hold with Sabatini.
When questioned about that meeting, he testified:
🔴 “My understanding as of, you know, the 17th or 18th, it was just a matter of when, and not if, and it was going to be soon.”
When subsequently asked whether it was “a done deal,” Weissman confirmed:
🔴“Yes. David was not viable at the Whitehead.”
This testimony places the decision-making process under serious examination, particularly given the timing of Sabatini's receipt of the investigative report.
🔴 3. THE INVESTIGATION'S ORIGINS AND WHITEHEAD'S LEADERSHIP.
The significance of this testimony extends beyond the final days of Sabatini's employment.
Previously disclosed communications from 2020 also document discussions involving Kristin Knouse and Whitehead's leadership concerning possible actions against Sabatini before the external investigation began.
In the court evidence presented in the post quoted below, we revealed contemporaneous communications in which Kristin Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration.
Those earlier communications, combined with Weissman's testimony, raise substantial concerns about the origins of the investigation, the independence of institutional decision-making, and whether Sabatini was afforded a meaningful opportunity to respond before the decision to remove him was made.
🔴 4. AN INSTITUTIONAL PROCESS WITH DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES.
On August 20, 2021, Sabatini's association with Whitehead Institute and HHMI ended.
The consequences extended far beyond those institutions, affecting his scientific career, professional affiliations, and reputation.
The subsequent proceedings at MIT culminated in a recommendation to revoke his tenure in April 2022, after which he resigned.
The scientific community deserves a full accounting of how these consequential decisions were reached, who participated in them, and whether the applicable procedures were followed.
Full accountability is essential for any misconduct established by the evidence, including improper institutional influence or denial of procedural fairness that contributed to Professor Sabatini's devastating ordeal.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL SWORN TESTIMONY AND COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE REVEALS EXPLOSIVE COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT A CONCEALED INVESTIGATION INTO PROFESSOR DAVID M. SABATINI — BEFORE WHITEHEAD'S DIVERSITY SURVEY.
🔱 New revelation — Court-disclosed messages describe a plan to use Whitehead Institute's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration.
The court evidence contains extraordinary contemporaneous communications involving Nora Kory, a former postdoctoral researcher in David Sabatini’s laboratory at Whitehead Institute, Kristin Knouse, and references to Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann.
THE PARTICIPANTS' OWN WORDS ARE STUNNING.
Nora Kory stated:
🔴 “Although we know the diversity survey was just a cover up and it was planned long before...”
Knouse responded that Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “was a little loose lipped early on…”
In another exchange, Kory described her discussion with Lehmann:
🔴 “we came up with the idea of ‘covering the investigation up’ with the diversity survey”
Knouse replied:
🔴 “Yea I mean this supports the notion that she has all along wanted to follow through on this but scared to do it without a smoking gun ...”
⚠️ THE SIGNIFICANCE IS PROFOUND.
These are contemporaneous messages in which participants explicitly described the diversity survey as a cover for an investigation they said had already been contemplated.
The communications raise serious concerns that the publicly presented sequence of events may not reflect the discussions taking place behind the scenes.
The references to Ruth Lehmann make the documentary evidence particularly consequential for examining Whitehead's leadership, the origins of the investigation, and the independence of the procedures that followed.
An institutional investigation must be transparent, impartial, and grounded in evidence. Its legitimacy cannot rest on procedures whose stated purpose may differ from the purpose discussed privately by those involved.
The documentary record demands independent scrutiny of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann's decision-making, the origins of the investigation, and the integrity of the procedures that followed.
📑 REVIEW THW ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Replying to @dragonfishy
🙏Q/ CoupLeader is an actor for who?
Where Coup uses 'Coherence in Communication'
To 'drive' Trust, loyalty & success by 'Speaking with One Voice' with 'Every message aligned'
As part of Vogelman's 'Corteks Complex Selling Methodology'
nitter.cf/coup_leader/status/144…
Case Studies/
↪️1982 Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol was at the centre of a nationwide panic.. laced with deadly potassium cynanide… reputation was on the line...
'One message': Consumer safety is our top priority.
'Powerful example how a unified message can turn a crisis into an opportunity.'
'Does your leadership team know how to communicate with coherence when it matters most?'
vimeo.com/coupleader
↪️2024 DNC Michelle Obama shows the way..
'Do something'
'Is an excellent example of the power of a simple idea delivered with a solid psychological action.'
youtube.com/@coupleader/vide…
@Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @franklin_reeder
@RennickGBR
A/
↪️2020 'Winning at Collaboration'
Coup Online Trainning:
David McCubbin - Organizer, Presenter
Josh Neilson - Me (Post Production Techie)
Jacinda Adhern - Attendee (NZ PM)
Antonio Guterres - Attendee (UN SG)
Michelle Obama - Attendee
Lloyd Vogelman - Founder & Director -Corteks
'Thanks Dave. Looking forward to it'
archive.is/wlLBJ
↪️2020 29 Apr COVID-19 Covid safe-app COUP
COVIDSafe App - A user's experience
'I know that some people are concerned about privacy..
The pandemic reminds us that humanity is a collective, noone functions independently of other people on the planet.
The virus is killing people. To stop that we have had to separate, we've had to stop economic activity which also kills people.
With the vaccine still months away we're being asked to be brave & start interacting again..
About balance & having risk mangement tools in place..
It is a miracle - think about it - it provides answers to questions that could never have been answered before this technology was invented but it will only work if half the population register & make it work.'
vimeo.com/412970761
↪️2021 Sep 21, Annie McCubbin Author of Australian Business Book of the Year - Best Audiobook 2021:
'Why Smart Women Make Bad Decisions' &
'Why Smart Women Buy the Lies'
Coach | Keynote Speaker | Facilitator | Thought Leader | Critical Thinker
The road out of COVID relies on sensible compliance. Trouble is, common sense is not as common as we'd like.
Why people are so susceptible to whacko theories about vaccines and masks... there's no mystery.
Have your shots. Wear your mask. Read my book.
(Not necessarily in that order.)
#covid #criticalthinking #whysmartwomenmakebaddecisions #majorstreetpublishing #compliance
archive.is/DA1nI
↪️2023 Paul Gallagher @ luckylosing:
Annie McCubbin & husband David presenting:
HOW UNDERSTANDING COGNITIVE FLAWS PROTECT YOU FROM BEING SCAMMED at #skepticon2023
archive.is/tiz3Z
↪️CoupLeader & Corteks 'Clients'
David McCubbin is Australia’s leading Corporate Dramatist who co-founded Coup – an organisational development, training & media production company - with Annie McCubbin in 2001. From a previous role in business development corporate media production house Vitascope & Iconmedialab, an e-business consultancy global leader (Swedish) in internet solutions.
Clients include Westpac, CBA, NAB, QBE, Freehills, Gilbert & Tobin, Clayton Utz, NSW Legal Aid, EY, Deloitte, PWC, KPMG, TAFE (NCI & Tasmania), Latrobe Uni, Charles Sturt Uni, Macquarie Uni, Nestle, Unilever, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Vodafone, Optus, Origin Energy, Sydney Water, BHP Billiton, Snowy Hydro, News Corp, the Macquarie Radio Network, & Healthshare NSW.
web.archive.org/web/20251104…
asx.com.au/asx/v2/statistics…
Dr Vogelman qualified as a clinical psychologist and received his doctorate from the Uni of London, Faculty of Science, Organisational Psychology.
Prior to founding Corteks, Dr Vogelman worked at Accenture & a Boston based Monitor Company, one of the world’s leading strategy companies founded by Michael Porter & was a visiting scholar at Harvard Uni and a visiting professor at De Paul Uni in Chicago.
His clients have included leading global & Australian companies such as: Reserve Bank of Australia, AGL; EY; X (Alphabet); The Reserve Bank; Australia Post; BT; Westpac; PWC; Perpetual; Roche Pharmaceuticals; Capgemini; Sensis; SAS; NAB; Societe Generale; Jones Lang LaSalle; Caltex; CBA; LogicaCMG; Roche Diagnostics; Investa Property Group; Woodside Petroleum; Cunningham Lindsey; Fletcher Challenge; South Pacific Tyres; ANSTO; Carter Holt Harvey; Bio-Rad Laboratories & Austrade.
web.archive.org/web/20251104…
icmi.com.au/lloyd-vogelman/
For all Annie's hectoring of Ryder, he still doesn't seem think he has a role to play in the recovery from COVID. If only he could read.
Fortunately, you can.
#whysmartwomenmakebaddecisions lnkd.in/gSVwz7dc
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Watch online➡️ videocast.nih.gov/watch/a2cb…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
LMAO... somehow the "fact check" ends up making the @APPCPenn whitepaper look even worse!
😂😂😂😂😂
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@open_vaet
@OpenVAERS
This is what Grok asserts is the "v-safe context" for the whitepaper - common, mild, short term reactogenicity symptoms
Oh the irony grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_95…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
I worked in a palliative setting in an AID's hospice in the early 2000's. Those patients were not dying from AIDS, they were dying from the meds they were being given that destroyed their organs. In Canada many people got AIDS from infected blood. All walks of life were in that hospice.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
No one prosecuted! Plus no changes in the FDA's approval process! Here's links to 5 articles spanning decades explaining how the FDA's approval process, conflicts of interest, and regulatory capture have caused catastrophic harm beginning with the FDA's approval of Vioxx in 1999.
THEY TRIED TO WARN US!
A) Jeanne Lenzer:pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556…
B) Michael Mooney:theepochtimes.com/health/fda…
C) John LaMattina:forbes.com/sites/johnlamatti…
D) Caroline Chen:propublica.org/article/fda-r…
E) David Ross:bmj.com/content/381/bmj.p106…
My thread on Michael Mooney:nitter.cf/jeffblack757/status/18…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
DES back in the 50-60s, too. I don't hear many speak on this, yet its effects are up to 3 generations.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Wait a second, I think.....there is some kind of mystery here......
TIME MAGAZINE: OUR CANCER MYSTERY | WHY IT'S STRIKING US SO YOUNG
2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Replying to @BrianSuttererMD
I'm sorry but your info-graphic is inaccurate. I just checked NFL, but, firstly, you're missing:
- J. Harrison, 2011
- D. Still, 2014
- A. Wentworth, 2015
- C. Jones, 2019
- H. Anderson, 2022
Secondly, your denominator looks incorrect. Even with your counts, the rates don't fit.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Protesters Use Violent Rhetoric on College Campuses Ahead of Midterms, Property Taxes Up 31% in 6 Years
Today's Digest covers campus protests, claims of election theft, Israel embargo, property taxes, Bitcoin fork, Lagarde exit, European decline, French speech bill, Israeli vote, AI grading, Queer Science, gas prices, and a ChatGPT lawsuit.
peakprosperity.pulse.ly/u8p0…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Hi folks
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@open_vaet
@OpenVAERS
Are the members listed on the PHMPT website still actively working on vaccine safety issues?
I wonder how many of them even know about the v-safe free text?
Does anyone know?
phmpt.org/members/



































