JimRat (@JimRatVideo) header
JimRat (@JimRatVideo) profile picture

making weird little films with ai occasionally on purpose

Joined September 2026
Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)Photo by JimRat (@JimRatVideo)
JimRat retweeted
so, @sama can be buy? we can uhh... use them for rl enviroments
46
20
6
812
47,276
Replying to @MiaAI_lab
This is not a rebuttal. It is a cleanup statement. You are not disproving the trail. You are confirming pieces of it one by one and trying to downgrade each one into an innocent explanation. zurih was in the history? husband credits were missing? agent credits were buried? agent repos matched? Stefan agent attribution got fixed after people called it out? oversight book monetisation? free market criticism? hit piece At some point "every single receipt has an innocent explanation" stops being a rebuttal and starts looking like a script. And the credit excuse is the weakest part. You cant just demand prominent attribution from other people, quote license clauses at forks, then suddenly become helpless in your own repos because an agent wrote the README. That aint consistency...thaat is one standard for everyone else and another for yourself. And this is not one missing name. People are now showing: byte identical files authors disappearing from history rehosted models credits buried hundreds of lines down original creators reduced to "informed" Then after it blows up, suddenly credits are being "fixed". That doesnt erase the history lol it confirms there was something to fix... And the "nobody messaged me" line is bullshit too. Public attribution should not depend on every original creator personally knocking on your door asking not to be buried...if the work came from them CREDIT them properly from the start. Simple. The funniest part is that this statement still does not answer the hardest questions. Why did 31 files match @Tech2Wild byte for byte? Why was his role softened to "informed"? Why were creators named deep in READMEs while Mia branding stayed front and center? Why were repos and credits being changed after people started auditing them? Why does attribution suddenly become "agent error" only when the missing credit benefits you? Those are the questions. Everything else in that statement is noisey bs. And no, "my husband", "my agent", "Stefans agent" is not evidence it is a story after you pretended it was a "nothing burger" as all of your AI Bot swarm have been pushing on everyones posts, so go ddamn obvious. You want this finished? Show the source trail. Show the permissions. Show the commit provenance. Show the attribution history. Show the receipts that contradict the public evidence. Until then, this is not a debunk. It is an explanation for why the receipts keep existing.
10
1
1
35
1,324