James the Just retweeted
In wake of the midterm elections, Bishop Irenei reminds us that while Christians may seek to better society through political participation, lasting change begins with repentance in our own hearts.
“Everyone is called to repent.”
James the Just retweeted
Spiritual Delusion and the Safe Path of Humility
On the path to salvation, the dangers aren't only the visible sins. There is also a hidden fall that wears the garment of piety: spiritual delusion (prelest). The one who is deluded doesn't know he is deluded, and that is exactly where the danger lies.
What is delusion?
St. Ignatius Brianchaninov calls it the damaging of human nature by falsehood: a person accepts a lie and takes it for the truth. The saint shows that since Adam's fall we are all exposed to this danger, so no one can consider himself beyond its reach. He distinguishes two forms of delusion:
– Fantasy: during prayer the mind forms images of Christ, of angels, or of lights, and the person comes to believe he is having visions.
– Self-opinion: this form is subtler and more widespread. The person sees nothing, yet imagines he has lofty spiritual feelings, that he has advanced, that he is better than others, and that he can teach them.
Both have the same root: pride and self-reliance. That is why Scripture warns us that "Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light" (2 Cor. 11:14). It also tells us not to believe every spirit, but to "test the spirits, whether they are of God" (1 John 4:1). "Let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall" (1 Cor. 10:12).
St. John Cassian tells of the elder Heron. He had lived fifty years in the desert with harsh fasting, but he trusted his own judgment more than the counsel of the fathers. The devil appeared to him as an "angel" and persuaded him to throw himself into a well, assuring him that no harm would come to him. He was pulled out nearly dead and died three days later, without even admitting that he had been deceived. The Fathers concluded that discernment is born of humility, that is, of revealing one's thoughts to those who are experienced.
St. Ignatius teaches that where there is true repentance, delusion finds no place. Whoever sees himself as a sinner doesn't seek visions and doesn't exalt himself. Prayer should be said with attention to the words, without imaginings, from a contrite heart. St. Isaac the Syrian says that whoever has been granted to see himself is greater than whoever has been granted to see angels. St. Gregory of Sinai adds that God is not displeased with someone who, fearing delusion, does not accept visions. "God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble" (James 4:6).
"Those who have no guidance fall like leaves, but in much counsel there is safety" (Prov. 11:14). And Scripture commands: "Ask your father, and he will show you; your elders, and they will tell you" (Deut. 32:7).
Even Saul, to whom Christ Himself appeared, was sent to a man of the Church, to Ananias: "Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do" (Acts 9:6). If the Lord Himself sent the Apostle to be guided, how much more do we need guidance?
St. Anthony said he had known monks who fell after many labors. They trusted in their own efforts and neglected the commandment "Ask your father." St. John of the Ladder shows that those who want to leave Egypt need a Moses. Abba Dorotheos says that no one is more easily overthrown than the one who has no one to guide him on the path of God.
St. Ignatius saw things soberly. He said that in our times Spirit-bearing elders are rare. That is why he urged a life under counsel:
– let us be guided by Scripture and the Holy Fathers;
– let us go to confession often;
– let us seek the advice of those who are experienced;
– let us test everything against the teaching of the Church.
He also urges us to beware of guides who praise themselves and demand obedience for their own glory. "If the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch" (Matt. 15:14). A true spiritual father doesn't bind you to himself; he leads you to Christ.
Whoever wants to be saved must travel by asking the way.
Their "economic messaging wasn't sharp enough"! That's really what they're discussing internally.
Lord, have mercy!
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
The elections aren't real.
Replying to @MattWalshBlog @basedyokel
Yep. But opposing the Iran war cost me about 10 points on the primary ballot.
Everything in this world is fake and an attempt to scam; none of it is real! Christ alone is truth!
Glory to the Lord God who sits on high and looks down low.
Have mercy on us, O Lord of mercies.
James the Just retweeted
Adam Robinson's company, Retention, creates software that de-anonymizes internet traffic, essentially the type of software that secretly figures out who you actually are, spies on you, and feeds you relevant ads or perhaps things far more heinous. Make of that what you will.
James the Just retweeted
Adem Adem, owner of the Learjet, and Nathalie Gadelha, the alleged pilot, searches peaked in Israel on 10/22 & 10/27.
James the Just retweeted
Adam Robinson died Sunday in a jet crash with his wife and two little kids.
He built tools that take an anonymous visit to a website and turn it into a real name and contact info. His company kept a digital file on people.
That's the raw material of a surveillance state. Data like this doesn't stay in marketing. It gets bought, merged, and fed into the same systems that track where you go, what you read, and who you are.
But he did it differently. He bootstrapped everything. He never took big VC money, and there was no board pushing him to grow the data as fast as possible or sell to someone bigger. He kept his companies lean and profitable, so he got to decide how far the data went, who got it, and under what rules.
Most founders in this space lose that option once the money comes in.
A surveillance state runs on cheap, easy access to personal information. It doesn't love founders who can say no and stay independent.
Who controls these companies matters more than people realize. When the founder still has control, the limits stay tight. When he doesn't, the data flows wherever the power wants it.
Please love one another, even your enemies. The evil one is doing all he can to turn your heart cold. The love of Christ is the only cure for the hearts of man.
James the Just retweeted
“The devil does not fear asceticism, not even fasting or vigils, if there is no humility.
He only fears humility, because humility brings the grace of God.”
- Saint Paisios of Mount Athos
Given the Duo display issues, I'm sincerely surprised they'd go with this image for the marketing campaign.
If he actually believed this, he'd have been a big blocker during the fork war.
Simon Dixon (@SimonDixonTwitt) says the real struggle is over who owns your money, your data & the technology you use.
He explains why he sees personal ownership as a way to resist a world of increasingly centralized power:




































