John Ashcroft retweeted
So Tommy Robinson is looking at 10 years for harassment. It’s funny how algorithms work. After watching a video about Tommys case a video of these two men put out by the police followed. It shows one of them physically attack a white litter enforcement officer and the other racially abuses him.
• Raja Malik: Charged with assault and racially aggravated assault.
• Mohammed Nawaz: Charged with assault and using an offensive weapon.
Both men admitted to their respective offenses and received suspended jail terms at Wolverhampton Crown Court. If Tommy does even one week in jail then it’s proof positive our justice system has been hijacked.
John Ashcroft retweeted
Will it take a serious accident in the name of diversity to realise this is inappropriate, dangerous, and frankly, utterly ridiculous?
John Ashcroft retweeted
Andrew Neil on the freeze in tax thresholds:
“It’s the biggest tax rise in British history and politicians love it because they think we won’t notice.”
We now have the highest tax burden in history and yet Labour are borrowing more than ever.
We have a sclerotic EU-style high cost, high-tax, high-regulation economy. The exact opposite of what need.
Another lost decade of stagnation is in prospect.
@afneil
Andrew Neil takes down Andy Burnham's budget in under 30 minutes youtu.be/7TsjdxYvpM8?is=Ilmz… via @YouTube
John Ashcroft retweeted
Replying to @RupertLowe10
I have lived near Wycombe for 21 years & seen it go from bad to worse. I hate to go in.
Can anyone give me an example of mass immigration "enriching" anything? Because I've never seen it. You only have to look at the names in the "In the dock" section of @bucksfreepress to know that it increases crime too.
John Ashcroft retweeted
In 2001 a man was convicted of indecently assaulting and abducting a 13-year-old girl in his private hire car. He served 18 months in prison. In 2005 Oldham Council handed him a taxi licence.
Oldham Council let him drive children for ten years before it eventually evoked his licence in January 2015. No one knows how many children he abused before the council was eventually forced to act.
This example is not unique. The same council licensed another man in 2003, two years after he was convicted of indecent assault. In September 2014 the council's head of licensing reported five licensed drivers to the Labour cabinet member responsible. The report set out their previous convictions, including sexual offences. After a screening exercise with Greater Manchester Police and the safeguarding board, one man was sent to a licensing panel and lost his licence. The other four kept driving.
The next year one of those four men sexually assaulted a child in his taxi. When he was convicted in 2017, the judge asked why he had ever been given a licence.
I'll tell you why he had been given a license.
1. Pakistani taxi drivers are protected by Pakistani politicians that sit on the licensing committees. In many instances, due to the clan based structure of this community, both councillor and child rapists are related. What is distant to you and I by western norms is close kin to them.
2. These Pakistani taxi drivers are organised. In every town and city across the land, they control tens of thousands of votes. Politicians do deals with them just as Labour do a deal with the unions.
3. Intervene unless you have been forced to and you open a can of worms. It is likely tens of thousands of taxi drivers will have their licenses removed. And the ethnic correlation of the drivers who have lost their licenses will be unavoidable.
Almost no council in England and Wales will act against the Pakistani Taxi Rape Gang Ring because they are effectively held to ransom by it. Which is why the government must intervene.
And for those of you who are asking, no, I am not going to let this go. If we want to stop the rape gangs, and protect our children, we need to take drastic action in both how our children's homes are run and how taxis operate.
Now tell me something. Where is Jess Phillips? Were is Shabana Mahmood? Where is our government?
_________
You know what we are up against. The mainstream media will not touch my work. Institutions I investigate do not volunteer their records. Politicians do not suddenly decide to hold themselves to account.
And yet, despite every attempt to stop us, we forced the national inquiry. We did that because enough ordinary people refused to go away.
But getting the inquiry was never the end of this campaign. In many ways it was only the beginning. Now we have to watch where it goes, what it investigates, which places it avoids, which witnesses it calls, which records it obtains and whether the same institutions that failed these children are allowed to control the story again.
Nobody else is going to do that work for us. And I cannot do it indefinitely working on my own. That is why I keep talking about 50,000 committed subscribers.
It is not a vanity number. I did not pluck it out of the air. With fifty thousand people with me means when we uncover something important, it does not depend on a newspaper editor, a television producer or an algorithm deciding whether you are allowed to see it.
It gives us reach they cannot easily shut down.
But there is another reason. I need to build a proper backroom operation around this work. At the moment I am investigating, researching, writing, publishing, producing the videos, running the newsletter, dealing with the technology and then starting again. It is unsustainable.
I need people behind me who can take care of the technical and production work so that I can spend my time doing the thing I do best. That is why we have been pushing so hard for new paid subscribers.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
If you read my work and want it to continue, I need your help. Sign up for free. There are no paywalls to access any of my work. If you can afford the £3 a month or £30 for the year, please become a paid subscriber.
We forced the inquiry. Now we need the numbers to make sure they cannot control what happens next. Unfortunately, we are reaching the end of the road where I can continue working this way.
The paid subscriptions have stalled. The audience is growing, but the number of people actually standing behind the work is not growing with it. Over a million people engaged in my content this week. Only a small fraction followed up with a subscription to my newsletter This is becoming impossible to sustain.
🔴 SIGN UP HERE
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk
Have a look around you. No on else in this country is doing the work that I do, never mind for nearly a decade. All I'm asking in return is that you sign up to a newsletter and add weight to our ability to take on the government. Is that too much to ask?
Raja Miah MBE
John Ashcroft retweeted
"Who is bankrolling Nigel Farage's party?" asks Bridget Phillipson. "Labour will protect our democracy from foreign influence."
Right. Same question back.
Who is bankrolling Labour, and the machine around it?
Gary Lubner. South African. Former Autoglass chief. Millions.
Lord Alli. Buys the clothes, lends the flat.
George Soros. Money into Best for Britain and Fair Vote, routed through a London outpost, which is how a foreign fortune gets round a ban on foreign donations.
Pierre Omidyar. French-Iranian, eBay founder, funding the campaign groups.
Bill Gates. In for the photo call.
Swedish philanthropists. Bloomberg.
And Verbatim, which made the Channel 4 sting she is riding, is itself funded from abroad. So the watchdog on foreign money is on foreign money.
And those are off the top of my head. No research. Give me an afternoon and the list fills a page.
So the party promising to protect democracy from foreign influence is up to its neck in it, legally, through the same door, and has proposed no cap that would inconvenience a single person in the room. They held a drinks party for them in Downing Street.
The question is not who is bankrolling Farage. It is why Labour thinks the answer changes depending on whose name is on the cheque.
"Protect our democracy from foreign influence." They would not know where to start.
Who is bankrolling Nigel Farage's party?
What interests are they seeking to advance?
Are they acting in Britain's best interests?
Reform UK are engulfed in sleaze and scandal. Labour will protect our democracy from foreign influence.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
John Ashcroft retweeted
Labour and the Tories opened the floodgates to millions of migrants from across the world.
Reform will achieve net negative migration, deport every illegal migrant and reverse this madness.
End of.
John Ashcroft retweeted
The OBR says that another 1.1 million more migrants will be added to Britain’s population over the next 6 years.
All while our health service, housing, prisons, roads and welfare system are buckling under pressure.
Burnham is betraying Britain.
We need net NEGATIVE immigration.
That is what Reform will deliver.
John Ashcroft retweeted
BUDGET FAILURE:
- Every household is worse off this year.
- Every household worse off every year til 2031 compared to OBR forecast just 6 months ago.
- Growth down
- Borrowing up
- Bureaucracy up
The Nightmare of socialism!
John Ashcroft retweeted
Labour’s budget has proven two things today.
They haven’t got a clue how to save our economy and they are coming for your money.
Only Reform can be trusted to lower your bills and save our country.
John Ashcroft retweeted
Slash foreign aid.
Slash welfare for foreigners.
Slash tax on overtime.
Slash Net Zero subsidies to
Slash energy bills.
Slash endless regulation.
Slash VAT burden for many.
Slash illegal migration.
Reform = British people first.
Bathroom, how posh! Our only tap was across yard in brewhouse and toilet was at the end of brewhouse and shared with next door.
Replying to @ColinSpenc4257
Yes I did. Ice on the inside of our bedroom windows. Mum would always have our clothes out on the rug before the fire, warming nicely. So we shot out of bed, straight into the living room, quick change into warm clothes then breakfast. Then bravely into the ice cold bathroom.
John Ashcroft retweeted
Another 1.1 million migrants to be added to our population?
We cannot go on like this.
John Ashcroft retweeted
Last 10 wins Vs West Ham United.
6. 8th November 2003.
West Ham 3-4 West Brom.
We went 3-0 down to the Hammers at Upton Park in the 1st 17 minutes.
Hulse then got 2 back, Defoe got sent off, Deane scored an own goal and Hughes got the winner.
#WBA
John Ashcroft retweeted
Have you worked hard and managed to save up some money?
Labour just decided to punish you by increasing the tax on the interest you earn.
It’s up to 49%.
The state will now take almost half of it.
To fund a welfare bill heading for £431 billion and hotels for people who broke into our country.
Reform will REWARD the people who pay for this country, not punish them.
John Ashcroft retweeted
Hidden away on page 111 of the Budget - 'The government is providing £150 million capital investment in 2027-28 to fund additional large sites to accommodate asylum seekers'
A treasonous decision.
Every penny of that should be directed towards a programme of mass deportations.
John Ashcroft retweeted
🚨 The budget reveals Labour will spend another £150 million on accommodation for ‘asylum seekers’.
While raising the tax burden to the highest level since WW2.
Like the Tories, Labour tax you to the eyeballs to take care of foreign nationals.
Reform will deport all the illegals they let in.






















