Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator (@JuriScience) header
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator (@JuriScience) profile picture

prof @droitumontreal | evidence law | medicine | experts/expertise | rhetoric | (techno)sciences | (meta)(bio)ethics — unusual music

YUL
Joined February 2015
Legal scholars read statutes, judgments, and other scholars. Trial transcripts are scandalously overlooked. Judgments present a tidy case. Transcripts show cases being made and unmade in real-time. My new paper examines expert evidence in a big telecom case ⬇️ 1/
1
1
303
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Trust me I’m cool..
33
128
16
3,358
311,763
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Did AI give me an ad mid conversation?
74
106
21
2,239
168,911
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
Asking my AI teacher how to spell seventeen
2,743
11,179
3,632
171,536
20,515,336
More on transparency and accountability in canadian euthanasia practice: I was given the link to the CPSO register, indicating an MD’s practice restriction. It has a very broadly worded undertaking & 3 *summaries* of decisions by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee...
Replying to @JuriScience
Here’s one of them, don’t have the other handy. But I suspect your concern is that nobody has gone to jail or faced criminal charges. Is that the case? Is it possible that people aren’t going to jail because they aren’t breaking the law? register.cpso.on.ca/physicia…
1
41
... I think the key point is this: What is at stake now is that the terms used in these pieties are open to interpretation. Based on this one example, we see how the system in place can work to keep the interpretations and the interpretive process behind closed doors....
1
13
... This is a problem because the meaning of the Criminal Code and the consequences associated with its transgression is a matter of public concern that should be debated and decided in open court. /END
11
Patrick Garon-Sayegh, legal science interrogator retweeted
We've stolen all your intellectual property and ruined the internet. Now we want your memory. Universal Basic Income is just around the corner.
Sam Altman says its bad that everyone's personal computers are using the world's limited supply of memory chips. "It’s quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world’s limited supply of DRAMs sitting in their own computer, and being used 5% of the time. Like, you want maximum utilization."
17
116
4
1,045
18,178
1- My posts weren’t about specific cases; they were about a legal regime. 2- I note that single cases can’t be used to criticize said regime (as they are routinely written off as anecdotes) but can be used as evidence that all is hunky-dory; I find this concerning. And…
Replying to @JuriScience
Hmm. One person is no longer allowed to do maid. Another had additional oversight applied for 6m. All public. And no suggestion in either case that the person was ineligible. So what are they missing that you apparently know everything about?
1
5
354
3- If you want to talk about specific cases, by all means, let’s drill down. How about you start by posting the links to the full text decisions of the cases you invoked? That way you & I & others who bother to read will have something concrete to anchor the discussion.
1
3
66