Kagi retweeted
it is getting f*cking weird: Anthropic's new agent Duet plugs into 6,000+ apps, and it still can't trade or move money between your accounts. even if you say yes
a business owner with about 110 employees says one agent brings it all together: no more opening 100 tabs
the 3 levels Anthropic built in:
1. does it alone: reads, drafts, prepares
2. asks you first: send, pay, sign, delete
3. never, even with your yes: trading, moving money between accounts
what the day looks like:
→ every few hours: checks your connected apps
→ morning: one short brief on what matters
→ all day: pings you only when something needs you
→ on its own cloud computer, so your laptop can be off
→ before it sends, pays, signs or deletes: waits for you
6,000+ apps → 4 actions it asks about → 0 trades → 1 yes from you
honest part: Anthropic says it can misread a thread or misjudge urgency, and you can't watch its browser yet. it's a research preview, US Pro and Max users first, through a waitlist
steal the rules. paste this into your own assistant:
"sort every task into 3 levels. level 1: do it alone and tell me after: read, summarize, draft. level 2: show me the exact action and wait for my yes: send, pay, sign, delete. level 3: never do it, even if i say yes: trading, moving money between accounts. if you are not sure, use level 2"
the app has a waitlist. the rules don't.
Kagi retweeted
Your ChatGPT chats are training data by default.
Your Gemini chats might be read by a human.
Your Claude chats can be stored for 5 years.
Here's how to turn all 3 off in 2 minutes.
Think about what you've pasted in there.
The medical question you were too embarrassed to ask a doctor.
The bank statement you asked it to explain.
Your ex's texts you asked it to analyze.
Your CV with your home address. Your salary. Your contract.
The code with your API key still in it.
Nobody asked you. It was just on.
ChatGPT trains on Free and Plus chats unless you switch it off. Most people never open that menu.
Google says it plainly in its own privacy notice: a subset of Gemini chats is reviewed by humans, including outside contractors. Reviewed chats are kept for up to 3 years. Even if you delete your activity.
And there's a trap. Even with activity off, if you hit thumbs up or thumbs down on a Gemini answer, that chat gets reviewed and kept for up to 3 years.
Claude asked everyone to pick a setting last year. If "Help improve Claude" is on, your chats are kept for 5 years. If it's off, 30 days.
It gets worse. Last year shared ChatGPT conversations started showing up in Google search. Mental health confessions. Job candidate reviews. Private source code. All one search away. OpenAI pulled the feature, but old shared links can still be live.
Here's the full fix. Takes 2 minutes.
ChatGPT → Settings → Data Controls → turn off "Improve the model for everyone"
ChatGPT → Settings → Data Controls → Shared Links → delete every link you don't need
ChatGPT → Settings → Personalization → Memory → read what it remembers about you. Delete what you don't want there.
Claude → Settings → Privacy → turn off "Help improve Claude"
Gemini → myactivity.google.com/produc… → turn off "Keep Activity"
For anything sensitive from now on, use Temporary Chat in ChatGPT. It doesn't train the model.
Turning these off only covers future chats. Go back and delete the old ones you'd regret.
You'll spend more time reading this post than fixing it.
Bookmark this so you don't lose it, and send it to anyone who uses AI every day.
it is getting f*cking weird: Anthropic's new agent Duet plugs into 6,000+ apps, and it still can't trade or move money between your accounts. even if you say yes
a business owner with about 110 employees says one agent brings it all together: no more opening 100 tabs
the 3 levels Anthropic built in:
1. does it alone: reads, drafts, prepares
2. asks you first: send, pay, sign, delete
3. never, even with your yes: trading, moving money between accounts
what the day looks like:
→ every few hours: checks your connected apps
→ morning: one short brief on what matters
→ all day: pings you only when something needs you
→ on its own cloud computer, so your laptop can be off
→ before it sends, pays, signs or deletes: waits for you
6,000+ apps → 4 actions it asks about → 0 trades → 1 yes from you
honest part: Anthropic says it can misread a thread or misjudge urgency, and you can't watch its browser yet. it's a research preview, US Pro and Max users first, through a waitlist
steal the rules. paste this into your own assistant:
"sort every task into 3 levels. level 1: do it alone and tell me after: read, summarize, draft. level 2: show me the exact action and wait for my yes: send, pay, sign, delete. level 3: never do it, even if i say yes: trading, moving money between accounts. if you are not sure, use level 2"
the app has a waitlist. the rules don't.
Kagi retweeted
this is f*cking wild: Anthropic deleted over 80% of its own agent’s prompt. it got no worse. you’re still adding rules to yours.
an Anthropic engineer explained why: older models needed hard rules and repeats. the new ones have better judgement.
your agent reads your whole CLAUDE.md at the start of every chat. every old rule is noise it reads again and again.
one command finds them: /doctor prompt-audit
it splits the work:
→ reads your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md and rules files, so nothing hides in a side file
→ flags lines written for older models, so you see what the new ones don’t need
→ finds rules that fight each other, so your agent stops guessing. two rules clash and it may just pick one
→ finds links to files that don’t exist, so your agent stops reading about nothing
→ shows the file and line for every flag. you fix each one in one edit
the numbers:
→ over 80% of the system prompt removed
→ no measurable loss on coding evals
→ 1 command. Claude Code v2.1.283 or newer
how: run claude update, open your project, type /doctor prompt-audit
new models need fewer rules. every extra line is noise your agent reads every time.
Anthropic already cleaned up its own prompt.
yours is still written for the old models.
Kagi retweeted
$15,000 A MONTH FOR AN EMPLOYEE OR $200 FOR AI. HE PICKED AI
his whole point is pretty simple. don't hire anyone at the start, pay for ChatGPT Pro and do the work yourself. and start posting content from day one, every day, because followers barely mean anything now. the For You page decides who sees you
honestly I agree with most of it
but nobody talks about the annoying part. paying $200 takes 10 seconds. posting every day when like 30 people see your stuff is way harder, and thats where most people just stop
I've been running my account since early august and yeah. some days a post still gets 9 views lol
AI saved me money for sure. but it can't make you keep going when nobody's watching
what actually works for me is pretty boring. show up every day, jump on trends while they're fresh, and stop checking the numbers every hour. the posts that blew up for me were never the ones I expected
this is f*cking wild: Anthropic deleted over 80% of its own agent’s prompt. it got no worse. you’re still adding rules to yours.
an Anthropic engineer explained why: older models needed hard rules and repeats. the new ones have better judgement.
your agent reads your whole CLAUDE.md at the start of every chat. every old rule is noise it reads again and again.
one command finds them: /doctor prompt-audit
it splits the work:
→ reads your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md and rules files, so nothing hides in a side file
→ flags lines written for older models, so you see what the new ones don’t need
→ finds rules that fight each other, so your agent stops guessing. two rules clash and it may just pick one
→ finds links to files that don’t exist, so your agent stops reading about nothing
→ shows the file and line for every flag. you fix each one in one edit
the numbers:
→ over 80% of the system prompt removed
→ no measurable loss on coding evals
→ 1 command. Claude Code v2.1.283 or newer
how: run claude update, open your project, type /doctor prompt-audit
new models need fewer rules. every extra line is noise your agent reads every time.
Anthropic already cleaned up its own prompt.
yours is still written for the old models.
Kagi retweeted
this is f*cking insane, Claude Code reverse-engineered a dead app and got 9 years of notes out of it
the app stopped getting updates in 2022. no export, no docs, no support email that answers. just a 2.3 GB data file in a format nobody ever wrote down
every OS update it opened a little slower. I knew one of them would be the last, and everything I'd written since 2017 would go with it
so at 23:04 I gave Claude Code a copy of that file and one rule: the original stays untouched
23:07 → readers point REA at the app and find the function that saves a note
00:52 → the format comes out: compressed 4 KB blocks chained together, images in a separate pool linked by ID
02:14 → mappers finish the spec. 31 fields, each one traced to the code that writes it
03:21 → first exporter run. 200 notes out, 6 of them missing their images
04:06 → the bug: two notes can share one picture, and the exporter only copied it once. fixed in one line
05:49 → full run. 14,212 notes as Markdown, 4,517 attachments, every original date kept
05:58 → checkers compare 200 random notes with the old app. 0 mismatches
handwriting and audio stayed raw and marked "check by hand". 0 bytes changed in the original
the bug at 4am is the reason I trust the rest. the exporter said it was done. the checkers opened the old app and proved it wasn't
that's the whole setup in one sentence: the agent that builds the export never gets to say it works
my notes now sit in a plain folder of Markdown files. no app, no account, nothing that can stop opening next year
meet the agents that got my notes back ↓
Kagi retweeted
I CAN'T F*CKING BELIEVE IT: ANTHROPIC'S ENGINEERS PUT 1 AGENT AGAINST A TEAM OF AGENTS.
THE TEAM WON BY 90.2% ON THEIR OWN RESEARCH TEST.
i drew it: 1 window fills up, cracks, splits into 4. an illustration, not a live run.
you give 1 chat the whole research job. 1 window holds every search.
how the team works:
→ 1 lead agent (Opus 4) reads the question and makes a plan
→ it starts 3 to 5 sub-agents (Sonnet 4) at the same time
→ each one searches in its own window
→ each one hands back only the key parts
→ the lead puts it all into 1 answer
→ parallel search cuts research time by up to 90% on complex questions
remember this part: it uses about 15x more tokens than a normal chat. 1 agent alone uses about 4x.
most people look for a smarter model. on a hard web search test, token use alone explained 80% of the difference in scores.
try it today: split 1 big task into 3 small chats. paste only their summaries into a 4th.
would you pay 15x the tokens for +90.2%?
Kagi retweeted
You don't need to show your face to make money on YouTube 👇
Faceless AI "Sleep Stories" channels are blowing up. Long videos, calm voice, zero editing skills.
How it works:
Pick a calm topic (space, history, fantasy)
Claude writes a 30-min story
ElevenLabs turns it into a soft voiceover
Add slow AI visuals or one looping image
Upload 3x a week
Long watch time = better monetization chances.
Honest part: it takes 2-3 months of consistent posting before it pays anything. Most quit in week 2.
Follow @AIPulseNewsX for new AI tools 🚀
Save and retweet if this was useful 🔁
I CAN'T F*CKING BELIEVE IT: ANTHROPIC'S ENGINEERS PUT 1 AGENT AGAINST A TEAM OF AGENTS.
THE TEAM WON BY 90.2% ON THEIR OWN RESEARCH TEST.
i drew it: 1 window fills up, cracks, splits into 4. an illustration, not a live run.
you give 1 chat the whole research job. 1 window holds every search.
how the team works:
→ 1 lead agent (Opus 4) reads the question and makes a plan
→ it starts 3 to 5 sub-agents (Sonnet 4) at the same time
→ each one searches in its own window
→ each one hands back only the key parts
→ the lead puts it all into 1 answer
→ parallel search cuts research time by up to 90% on complex questions
remember this part: it uses about 15x more tokens than a normal chat. 1 agent alone uses about 4x.
most people look for a smarter model. on a hard web search test, token use alone explained 80% of the difference in scores.
try it today: split 1 big task into 3 small chats. paste only their summaries into a 4th.
would you pay 15x the tokens for +90.2%?
Kagi retweeted
REA is most dangerous thing on the internet right now...
It lets your AI agent reverse engineer any app, down to the binary
If you use it correctly, you can rebuild any feature you pay for, for FREE
In this article, I show you how:
Kagi retweeted
Okay this is f*cking wild:I left an old Android charging overnight.
By morning it had answered messages, paid a bill, cleaned photos and caught a $482 mistake - all by itself.
Ex-Google Android engineer split the agent into 4 roles.
One of them only exists to check the other three.
What it did:
→ 3 chats answered
→ electric bill paid
→ 3 duplicate photos deleted, 214 backed up
→ wrong amount caught: $482.00 instead of $48.20
Planner → Reader → Tapper → Typer → Checker.
42 tasks. 19% → 98% battery.
This is not sci-fi.
Alibaba’s Mobile-Agent-v3 runs the same split (plan → act → check) and scores 73.3 on AndroidWorld.
Everyone gives AI a chat window.
Almost nobody gives it a whole phone.
Your old phone could work the night shift.
You’re the one keeping it in a drawer.
Okay this is f*cking wild:I left an old Android charging overnight.
By morning it had answered messages, paid a bill, cleaned photos and caught a $482 mistake - all by itself.
Ex-Google Android engineer split the agent into 4 roles.
One of them only exists to check the other three.
What it did:
→ 3 chats answered
→ electric bill paid
→ 3 duplicate photos deleted, 214 backed up
→ wrong amount caught: $482.00 instead of $48.20
Planner → Reader → Tapper → Typer → Checker.
42 tasks. 19% → 98% battery.
This is not sci-fi.
Alibaba’s Mobile-Agent-v3 runs the same split (plan → act → check) and scores 73.3 on AndroidWorld.
Everyone gives AI a chat window.
Almost nobody gives it a whole phone.
Your old phone could work the night shift.
You’re the one keeping it in a drawer.
Kagi retweeted
5 open-source repos. 286K GitHub stars. One per job to make a video in code.
This video used 2 of them: Anime.js and FFmpeg.
You keep a folder of 20 tools. You need 5.
01 / Motion: Anime.js
A timeline for every move, so motion stays in sync.
→ github.com/juliangarnier/ani…
02 / Physics: Matter.js
Objects fall and bounce like real ones.
→ github.com/liabru/matter-js
03 / 3D: Three.js
3D scenes in code, right in the browser.
→ github.com/mrdoob/three.js
04 / Sound: Tone.js
Synths and sound effects, so the video is not silent.
→ github.com/Tonejs/Tone.js
05 / Export: FFmpeg
The least flashy one. 65.7K stars. Frames become a file you can post.
→ github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg
Stars:
Three.js: 115K
Anime.js: 72.5K
All 5: 286K
Today: find the one job your videos miss. Start with that repo.
Saving tools feels like progress.
Shipping one video is progress.
5 open-source repos. 286K GitHub stars. One per job to make a video in code.
This video used 2 of them: Anime.js and FFmpeg.
You keep a folder of 20 tools. You need 5.
01 / Motion: Anime.js
A timeline for every move, so motion stays in sync.
→ github.com/juliangarnier/ani…
02 / Physics: Matter.js
Objects fall and bounce like real ones.
→ github.com/liabru/matter-js
03 / 3D: Three.js
3D scenes in code, right in the browser.
→ github.com/mrdoob/three.js
04 / Sound: Tone.js
Synths and sound effects, so the video is not silent.
→ github.com/Tonejs/Tone.js
05 / Export: FFmpeg
The least flashy one. 65.7K stars. Frames become a file you can post.
→ github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg
Stars:
Three.js: 115K
Anime.js: 72.5K
All 5: 286K
Today: find the one job your videos miss. Start with that repo.
Saving tools feels like progress.
Shipping one video is progress.
Kagi retweeted
THIS IS F*CKING WILD. A CHINESE LAB JUST SHIPPED A MODEL THAT SCORES 55.
Anthropic's Opus 5.5 scores 58.
It costs half.
A new model dropped, so I decided to test it.
Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro. 4 rounds, published scores.
You pay $20 per 1M output tokens for Opus.
Kimi asks $10.
The 4 rounds:
Code: Opus 66.4, Kimi 65.7. The gap is under 1 point, and Kimi's tokens cost 50% less.
Finance: Kimi 64.4, Opus 62.2. So the cheaper model reads reports better.
3D: Opus 96.2, Kimi 92.7. So Opus is ahead on 3D models.
Price: Kimi $2 in, Opus $4 in. So every token costs half.
Score: 2 : 2.
Tiebreak, overall index by Artificial Analysis: Opus 58, Kimi 55.
Round scores come from Moonshot's own charts.
Moonshot says open weights come by Nov 4.
You can try Kimi on its API today.
Opus is still smarter.
Kimi is close enough to make you do the math.
Opus is 3 points smarter.
You pay 2x for those 3 points.
Your call.
THIS IS F*CKING WILD. A CHINESE LAB JUST SHIPPED A MODEL THAT SCORES 55.
Anthropic's Opus 5.5 scores 58.
It costs half.
A new model dropped, so I decided to test it.
Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro. 4 rounds, published scores.
You pay $20 per 1M output tokens for Opus.
Kimi asks $10.
The 4 rounds:
Code: Opus 66.4, Kimi 65.7. The gap is under 1 point, and Kimi's tokens cost 50% less.
Finance: Kimi 64.4, Opus 62.2. So the cheaper model reads reports better.
3D: Opus 96.2, Kimi 92.7. So Opus is ahead on 3D models.
Price: Kimi $2 in, Opus $4 in. So every token costs half.
Score: 2 : 2.
Tiebreak, overall index by Artificial Analysis: Opus 58, Kimi 55.
Round scores come from Moonshot's own charts.
Moonshot says open weights come by Nov 4.
You can try Kimi on its API today.
Opus is still smarter.
Kimi is close enough to make you do the math.
Opus is 3 points smarter.
You pay 2x for those 3 points.
Your call.
Kagi retweeted
HOLY SH*T. ANTHROPIC LAUNCHED DUET 3 DAYS AGO AND IT WRITES TO YOU FIRST
a normal chat waits until you type. duet checks your apps on its own and pings you when something needs a human
i went through the launch docs and drew what it does:
→ plugs into 6,000+ connectors, like your inbox and calendar
→ checks them every few hours on its own cloud computer, so your laptop stays shut
→ sends 1 morning brief with only the items that need you
→ drafts replies and builds dashboards, decks and web apps on opus 5.5
→ stops for your yes before it sends, pays, signs or deletes. anthropic's own demo shows a $640 permit fee waiting for approval
you wake up and press yes
you can't watch its browser. anthropic also says it can misread a thread and miss mail that lands between checks. remember that part
no extra price. it runs on your pro or max limits, and background checks count too. research preview, us only, waitlist
the video is my sketch of that flow. numbers on screen are demo data
no waitlist? run the closest version today. connect your mail and calendar in your ai app, then ask:
"be my chief of staff for tomorrow
1. read my inbox and calendar for the next 24 hours
2. pick the 5 items that need me most, most urgent first, and say why for each
3. draft a reply for each one and never send it
4. never send, pay, sign or delete anything. ask me first"
start with 1 day of mail and check the 5 items by hand before you trust it
would you give it your inbox for a week if it can't send, pay, sign or delete without you?
Kagi retweeted
🚨 A CLIENT HAS $2K AND WANTS A CONSTRUCTION WEBSITE. THIS IS WHAT ONE PERSON + AI CAN DELIVER 🤯🏗️
Scroll down and the house builds itself: foundation → walls → windows → finished home.
No template. No boring portfolio. A site that people actually remember.
A few years ago this meant a designer, a motion artist, a developer and weeks of work. Today one person with taste and the right AI tools can pull it off in days.
💡 Why this is your window:
Every builder, realtor, architect, gym and restaurant wants a site that stands out, and most are still stuck on cookie-cutter templates. That's the gap.
Automation and AI agents are flooding freelance and gig platforms, and competition is getting heavier every month. Right now, a human with an eye for design and AI as a power tool still has a real edge.
🚀 How to start this week:
1️⃣ Pick one niche (construction, real estate, interiors)
2️⃣ Build one "scroll-story" demo site
3️⃣ Screen-record it and send it to 10 local businesses
4️⃣ Sell the result, not your hours
The people who move first set the prices 💰
♻️ REPOST so you don't lose this
🔖 SAVE it
💬 Comment "BUILD" and I'll break down the tools
➕ FOLLOW for daily AI news