
Author of Radical: The Science, Culture and History of Breast Cancer in America. Journalism prof @LoyolaMarymount. Formerly of @Time
Joined June 2009
- Tweets7K
- Following1.2K
- Followers3.3K
- Likes1.3K
NAHJCareers.org Tenure-Track-Assistant-or-Associate-Professor-in-Media-and-Technology: Gainesville, University of Florida
Tenure-Track Assistant or Associate Professor in Media and Technology
Job No: 541507
Work Type:… dlvr.it/TVhKhh nahjcareers.org
Kate Pickert retweeted
Bobby McIlvaine was 26 when he died in the September 11 attacks. In 2021, @JenSeniorNY wrote about grief, conspiracy theories, and one family’s search for meaning in the decades since 9/11. Revisit the Pulitzer Prize–winning story: theatln.tc/M5hM8CcK theatlantic.com/magazine/arc…
Kate Pickert retweeted
One of the most incredible first paragraphs of any magazine piece over the last 100 years.
In 2003, Tom Junod chronicled the photograph's origin and enduring legacy. esquire.com/news-politics/a4…
Kate Pickert retweeted
New pod/transcript: PANGRAM VS THE MACHINE
Since 2022, the share of English-language webpages that are partly or entirely written by AI has increased from roughly 1 percent to nearly 40 percent. Like a tsunami of sludge, AI writing is inundating everything from high school essays to Twitter and LinkedIn longposts, to Amazon biographies, to the oped pages of the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post.
The war on AI writing has turned Pangram into a surprising cultural phenomenon, a tool that is also a meme. I wanted to know more about how the company's technology works and how its leaders think about the fact that their invention is becoming an icon of the anti-AI moment.
So I spoke with founder and CEO @max_spero_ about:
- how Pangram works
- why we should trust it
- what the technology says about the fundamental differences between machine vs. human writing
- whether AI-writing witch hunts are something we should welcome or fear
- whether Pangram is at risk of getting displaced by an AI detector from the frontier labs or tech platforms
derekthompson.org/p/the-inte…
Kate Pickert retweeted
In the Pentagon Papers case, the Supreme Court ruled that it is legal to publish top-secret info and that the free press has a responsibility to do so to prevent the government from deceiving the public, especially during wartime.
Publishing highly classified assessments from the Secretary’s orders book is a crime.
It’s a betrayal of the force.
And much of what they’re publishing is inaccurate.
Of course, we demand candid military advice. Non-concurs are standard. The Secretary sees them constantly. That’s how you run a real military.
We are in great shape around the world.
This story isn’t about readiness.
It’s TDS and PDS — they hate President Trump and Secretary Hegseth more than they love America.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
While leaking classified material is illegal for government employees, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) that the First Amendment protects the press's right to publish classified information of public interest. nytimes.com/2016/06/30/ins…
Kate Pickert retweeted
An obituary doesn't have to be (only) a thing of sorrow. This is fantastic.
nytimes.com/2026/08/25/arts/…
Kate Pickert retweeted
The @NewYorker editor David Remnick is looking for his next executive assistant:
condenast.wd115.myworkdayjob…
One reason that some childhood vaccines are grouped together is to increase uptake. Asking parents (who, for example, may work multiple jobs and/or be under- or uninsured) to take a child to the doctor four extra times (as Trump is saying) will decrease the rate of vaccination.
Important study (and story). Lowering the cancer death rate isn’t just about more science. It’s about better access to the latest drugs, better education of patients and doctors and less shame around diagnosis. Heartbreaking to read that so many patients lives were cut short.
“More than half of patients with metastatic lung cancer don’t receive life-extending treatments, like chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, a new study found.” nytimes.com/2026/05/07/well/…
Kate Pickert retweeted
.@voxdotcom Future Perfect is hiring three fellows.
If you want to spend a year writing about the biggest stories the media is missing — AI, global health, animal welfare, catastrophic risk — apply by May 12. Fellowships begin in July, remote option. job-boards.greenhouse.io/vox…
Kate Pickert retweeted
NEWS: NPR receives $113M toward digital transformation and to offer stations greater services as the loss of federal funds takes a big bite out of budgets.
$80M from philanthropist Connie Ballmer
$33M from anonymous donor
My initial story:
npr.org/2026/04/16/nx-s1-578…
More to come
Kate Pickert retweeted
This is a must-follow on here, part of an increasingly active rapid response by the NYT to mischaracterizations of our reporting>
Replying to @RNCResearch
As the article makes clear, this reporting is based on an analysis of more than 40,000 comments on President Trump’s posts on Truth Social.
Kate Pickert retweeted
JUST IN: Judge Friedman has rejected the Pentagon’s revised press policy, saying it flouted his earlier order and represents a bid by Hegseth and the Trump admin to “dictate” coverage, what he calls “the mark of an autocracy, not a democracy.” ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin…
Kate Pickert retweeted
All the President’s Men turns 50 today.
This famous “six‑minute shot” is a masterclass in phone acting and pure technical nerve.
Director Alan J. Pakula and cinematographer Gordon Willis pull off a single, unbroken slow zoom: from a wide, humming newsroom to a tight close-up on Redford. No cuts. No safety net. Tension builds in real time.
Redford carries it with typical quiet confidence. Six minutes of note-taking and talking into a phone, no flashy “Oscar clip.” He even flubs a name (“McGregor” for “Dahlberg”), corrects himself naturally, and Pakula keeps it because it feels authentic.
The background is part of the story. As Woodward hones in on his phone call, everyone behind him huddles around a TV watching Senator Tom Eagleton resign. The contrast is deliberate: they chase the “obvious” headline, while the camera drifts past them to Woodward, and the real story.
To hold Redford and the busy background in focus early on, they used a split‑diopter lens, then had to ease it out as the camera moves in. A technical tightrope. The timing of both actor and cinematographer is spot on.
As Woodward closes in on the truth, the world literally falls away: the newsroom blurs, the noise fades, and we lock into his obsession. It’s one of cinema’s great moments: Redford doing almost nothing—and somehow everything at the same time.
What makes this shot brilliant is the contrast it carves between Redford and the newsroom around him. The visual language does the talking: he’s locked in, disciplined, driven, all focus and fire. He stands apart because the work matters more than anything else.
Kate Pickert retweeted
This is honestly the perfect way to start your morning. Also if you ever need a lottery ticket, ask this guy to buy it!
Replying to @_cingraham
I love the headline they came up with: The Year I Was Supposed to Die slate.com/life/2026/03/healt…
Kate Pickert retweeted
Or…
It’s a news organization that figure out how to replace classified and display ads
An NYT staffer joked a couple years back when we published this piece at VF about how the “Times is now a gaming company that also happens to offer news.”
vanityfair.com/news/inside-t…
Kate Pickert retweeted
"I can't believe you left big tech to pursue a career in journalism."
The journalism:
nytimes.com/2026/02/12/insid…
I'm teaching this remarkable piece of work today to my Introduction to Journalism students. Huge thanks to @micarosenberg and @propublica for this important story. propublica.org/article/life-…




























