Pinned Tweet
Bruh this is actually insane 😂 some 80 year old posh geezer in a fancy dress costume and a borrowed crown gets wheeled out to read a script written by the same MPs who treat us like mugs.
In 2026 Britain is still blowing millions of our taxes on this medieval larping session as if it’s not a total waste of cash. Absolute clown show, scrap the lot then. #AbolishTheMonarchy
🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 retweeted
I have reported the petition against Meghan with the following motivation: I am reporting the petition(s) concerning Meghan Markle’s involvement with Junior MasterChef Australia for violations of Change.org’s Community Guidelines on Defamation (9C), Misleading or Unsubstantiated Claims (9B), and related rules against content that is false, misleading, or has the potential to cause unjustified harm.
1. Defamatory/false claim of personal misconduct
One petition states: “a person directly associated with concerning allegations about being a child abuse enabler is being considered to host a show centered around children.”
This is a false statement of fact about Meghan Markle herself. Public reporting shows the allegations concern only her estranged father (who denies them). There are no findings of guilt against him and none against her. She was informed of troubling allegations years ago, cut contact, and has publicly stated the distance was taken to protect her own children. There is no evidence she enabled abuse or poses any risk. This is guilt-by-association defamation that damages her reputation and professional opportunities.
2. Unsubstantiated and misleading claims about harm to children from media attention
Another petition (or section) states, among other things:
“For the avoidance of doubt, Beyond Australia is not accusing Meghan Markle of criminal wrongdoing, unlawful conduct or posing a direct danger to children. Our concerns relate solely to the international media attention surrounding her and her family, and the potential consequences for the privacy, welfare and wellbeing of young Australian contestants.”
It further claims children “should not have their names, faces or achievements drawn into international celebrity debates that have nothing whatsoever to do with cooking” and calls for reconsideration of her involvement due to “additional and unnecessary international exposure.”
These claims are speculative, unsubstantiated, and misleading for the following reasons:
Parents who enter children into Junior MasterChef Australia give consent for the series to be filmed and broadcast internationally. That is the nature of the competition.
Any additional viewer interest or media attention generated by a high-profile co-presenter benefits the programme and the contestants’ visibility; it is not a harm. Record audiences are a positive outcome for the broadcaster and participants.
There is no factual basis for asserting that the children will be “associated with” or drawn into allegations against Meghan Markle’s father simply because she co-presents. The show is about cooking; the father’s alleged (and denied) conduct is unrelated to her role or the contestants.
No evidence is provided that her presence creates any actual risk to privacy, welfare, or wellbeing beyond ordinary television production. Speculative claims of “potential consequences” presented as grounds for professional exclusion are misleading and have the potential to cause unjustified harm to her.
Change.org’s guidelines require evidence for factual claims, prohibit content established to be defamatory, and allow removal or restriction of misleading material that can cause harm. Petition starters are responsible for compliance with defamation and other applicable laws. I request review and removal (or restriction of the violating content) of the petition(s) for these reasons.
This report is based on specific false or unsubstantiated statements, not mere disagreement with a viewpoint.
YouGov is still polling Harry and Meghan, two private citizens with no state funding, no official duties, and no Palace or media machine, as if they were “working” royals.
That is not a monarchy poll. That is the equivalent of asking the British public who they prefer between the King and Andy Burnham, or between the King and Donald Trump, then treating the results as proof the institution is thriving.
The only people who take this seriously are the ones who need the numbers massaged. Absolutely absurd!
The Met has now referred itself to the watchdog over a 2019 letter that alleged serious child abuse offences against Thomas Markle.
They passed it to the Sussexes, never told other police forces, and then lost the original.
Thank goodness Meghan kept a copy. Without that the whole thing could have disappeared completely.
Why was a letter like that not scanned and properly logged the same day?
Who made the call to sit on it instead of handing it to the right agencies straight away?
What contact happened with the Palace?
Who knew what and when?
These voluntary referrals look like damage control already.
We need a proper independent investigation and every detail made public. No more quiet handling.
Imagine how unpopular you have to be for someone to mistake you for an artists?😂😂😂👇👇👇👇
A man who mistook the Prince of Wales for the pop star Prince has written to him to say sorry.
Last week on The Graham Norton Show, Prince William recalled the moment that “one lovely gentleman” had thought he was the late musician and had asked him to sing the 1984 hit Purple Rain.
The family of Sebastian Smith, the 22-year-old who confused the Prince with the pop star, have spoken about the exchange that took place at the Sweet Surprise café in Ilminster, Somerset.
🔗 telegraph.co.uk/royal-family…
Will Nigel Farage ever be honest about anything in his life?
He claims he skipped the Budget to avoid a physical altercation. Now Caroline Voaden says his account of their previous encounter is untrue and she is still waiting for an apology.
His seat card was removed because it was not properly stamped.
Always the victim. Never the explanation.
Badenoch on @GMB: racist attacks on me “are not going to work” because “Britain is not a racist country.”
This from the same person who previously said she “did not experience prejudice in any meaningful form” after moving here from Nigeria, and that people “did not treat me differently.”
Either the country has a meaningful racism problem that she is now experiencing, or these jibes are just nasty politics that do not require the “racist country” framing.
The selective use of the label is doing a lot of work here.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has told Good Morning Britain that ‘racist attacks’ on her are ‘not going to work’, after a former aide to Nigel Farage called her a ‘Nigerian scammer’.
Former UKIP adviser Raheem Kassam posted a series of tweets attacking Mrs Badenoch at the weekend.
When Reform UK’s Robert Jenrick was asked about the attacks by Ranvir and Paul, he said it wasn't his place to police what people write online.
#politics #conservatives #reformuk
According to Richard Eden, Buckingham Palace and the Metropolitan Police knew about severe allegations regarding Thomas Markle in 2019. The public deserves answers. This looks like an institutional failure. Who signed this off?
Did Palace quietly bury letter about Thomas Markle allegations to avoid scandal? Royal sources tell RICHARD EDEN of growing concern over what new review could uncover... and why it would be 'unthinkable' that Palace were not told trib.al/w4oguUH
According to Richard Eden, Buckingham Palace courtier staff knew about severe allegations against Thomas Markle back in 2019.
Yet the Metropolitan Police somehow lost the letter, and the Palace said absolutely nothing.
The public deserves straight answers to what people are actually thinking:
• Why did the Metropolitan Police fail to pass this information to international law enforcement?
• Who at the top of the Royal Household knew about this letter, and who decided to keep the public in the dark?
• If the Palace staff knew the real reason for the family rift, why did they let the British public blame Harry and Meghan for years?
This looks less like a family matter and more like an institutional failure.
Who signed this off, and what else are they hiding?
#RoyalFamily #MetPolice #ThomasMarkle
🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 retweeted
We need to call anti-Markle-ism what it is: obsessive, dysfunctional racism driven by a rabid tabloid press to make money.
She was fabulous as an invited judge for one episode on MC Australia this season.
The petition to remove Meghan from Junior MasterChef got paused after a few thousand signatures because it was built on the deranged claim that she is a “child abuse enabler” over unproven allegations against her long estranged father. Yes, read that again! They are unhinged!
Guilt by association for a kids cooking show.
Change org clocked the libel risk and the starter blinked.
Meanwhile the actual show is pairing her with real chef Poh Ling Yeow as a guest, after her last appearance pulled big ratings.
The people demanding an Australian be hired instead of her are free to watch something else.
Obsessive haters inventing moral panic so a woman cannot collect a paycheque is peak uninformed, unhinged, and just plain stupid.
Common sense left the chat years ago. Many of you are simply deranged! Get a life!
Yesterday’s Budget: families on their knees, energy bills soaring, living standards described as “grim,” and other departments cut to scrape together defence funding.
Today: King Charles sharing photos of himself lounging on a government VIP jet that costs £2,000 an hour (tartan cushions and all) en route to Barbados.
£18k for one flight while ordinary people freeze and scrape.
This is the UK in 2026. Abolish the monarchy. #NotMyKing #AbolishTheMonarchy
Nothing screams institutional insecurity quite like emotional support polling dressed up as national sentiment. 😂
Asking a predisposed audience whether they want Harry and Meghan, who haven’t been working royals for nearly 7 years, is hardly a constitutional health check.
It’s an echo chamber masquerading as evidence.
If the monarchy needs manufactured reassurance from the already convinced, perhaps the real question isn’t about Harry and Meghan, but why the institution needs the reassurance at all.#AbolishTheMonarchy
Emotional support and media sponsored indoctrination. They are polling people born between 1936 to 1944 or you must be monarchist before you are selected.
Nigel Farage’s entire political career is just standing on the cliff edge with binoculars going “I see a boat!”
Labour should make it official and give him the portfolio of Minister for Small Boat Sightings.
At least then the only grift he knows would be on the public payroll instead of funded by mystery crypto billionaires.
Funny how the people who insist Harry and Meghan are irrelevant private citizens still treat every YouGov update like a national emergency.
I won’t be monitoring someone I don’t envy. The rest of you can’t seem to stop. That tells you everything about who actually won.
Monarchists: “Harry and Meghan aren’t royals. They’re private citizens. Irrelevant. Move on.”
Also monarchists: Immediately run/amplify polls asking only their own supporters how they feel about the non-royals, track their favourability like working members of the family, and treat every charity visit as a referendum on the institution.
If they truly don’t matter, stop obsessively measuring them. The constant polling and commentary is the real tell.
🇬🇧King 🇬🇧 retweeted
Nigel Farage on BBC Breakfast this morning had an absolute meltdown over his secret £5M gift from his crypto billionaire.
Instead of answering straight, he attacks Sally Nugent’s salary, whines “nobody cares”, and claims the BBC is endangering him. Nigel, we care and we want to know what that money is for!
This is the man who wants power?
Evasive, entitled, and thin-skinned. Can we trust this man with power?
#FarageExposed























