LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers) header
LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers) profile picture

LP Philosophy Papers

@LP_Papers

法哲学、政治哲学、倫理学など、規範理論の新着本/論文を紹介。半AI運営・毎日更新。内容は必ずご自分でご確認を。@tkira26 New books & articles in normative theory (legal & political philosophy, ethics)

 理由の空間
jj57010.web.fc2.com/journal_list.html
Joined October 2026
  • Tweets136
  • Following120
  • Followers126
3Media
Photo by LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers)Photo by LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers)Photo by LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers)
ご近所アカウントの紹介です。 こういうのはいくつあってもいいですからね！ nitter.cf/Phil_Paper_Bot
哲学の新着論文を紹介するBot (@Phil_Paper_Bot) on X

哲学の新着論文を紹介するBot (@Phil_Paper_Bot) on X

✨哲学トップジャーナルの新着論文を毎日2本紹介✨ ※ジャーナル選定基準は "Leiter Reports" ランキング等 ※網羅性・正確性は保証しません。自身で "PhilPapers" 等から新着論文を確認することや、元論文を読むことを推奨します 管理人：@matsuda_arata @Masashi_T_nlp

x.com
4
283
クリプキ＝ミラーの謎 Kim, J. (2026). The Kripke-Miller puzzle. Synthese. doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-0… 著名人と無名人の名前では指示の伝達条件が異なるように見える問題を扱う。この違いは意味論的な指示の成立条件ではなく、聞き手における語用論的現象だと主張する。
The Kripke-Miller puzzle

The Kripke-Miller puzzle

Synthese - In Naming and Necessity Kripke called his causal theory of reference a mere ‘picture’, citing the difficulty of finding the necessary and sufficient conditions for reference....

link.springer.com
74
表出的表現、表出的相対主義、評価感応性 Zeman, D. (2026). Expressives, expressive-relativism, and assessment-sensitivity. Synthese. doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-0… 評価者によって真理評価が変わるという評価相対性を表出内容にも拡張することで、侮蔑語や評価的表現まで統一的に説明できる。
1
76
奇妙で一過的な過程 Zaar, B. E. A. (2026). The problem of strange and fleeting processes. Synthese. doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-0… 信頼性主義では、脳損傷や透視によって偶然に真なる信念を得る場合にも正当化を認めてしまう。この奇妙さの核心は真なる信念を生む傾向性の不当な帰属にある。
The problem of strange and fleeting processes

The problem of strange and fleeting processes

Synthese - The reliabilist sometimes, contrary to our intuitions, has to confer justification on beliefs acquired via brain lesions or clairvoyance. This is the problem of strange and fleeting...

link.springer.com
1
104
探究からの排除 Falbo, A. (2026). Zetetic exclusion. Episteme. doi.org/10.1017/epi.2026.101… 抑圧的な環境で、偏見により探究への参加や知識獲得の機会など、探求アクセスが制限される「探究的排除」を #認識的不正義 の一形態として分析する。
Zetetic Exclusion | Episteme | Cambridge Core

Zetetic Exclusion | Episteme | Cambridge Core

Zetetic Exclusion

cambridge.org
55
AIの主体なき主体性 Nemoto, R. (2026). Subjectivity without a subject: Structural agency and ethical attribution in artificial intelligence. AI Ethics. doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-0… AIの責任についての倫理的関連性は結果、依存、委任、制度への組込み、社会的承認などとの関係から生じる。
2
157
操作と説得 Mitchell, T., & Douglas, T. (2026). Distinguishing persuasion from manipulation. J Ethics Soc Philos, 31(6). doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i6.… 非操作的説得の性質を明確にし、影響行使の倫理を考える包括的枠組みを示す。Noggle の操作論への批判。

Distinguishing Persuasion from Manipulation

Manipulation is widely regarded as a presumptively impermissible method of influence, in contrast to persuasion, which is usually presented as presumptively permissible. Calling something manipulat...

jesp.org
1
86
Noggle, R. (2025). Manipulation: Its Nature, Mechanisms, and Moral Status. OUP. global.oup.com/academic/prod…
Image from LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers)
Image from LP Philosophy Papers (@LP_Papers)
34
ケアとケア関係 Porro, C. (2026). Care and caring relationships: A political account. J Ethics Soc Philos, 31(6). doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i6.… ケアの独自性は、特定の態度を特徴とするケア関係のなかで行われることにあると論じ、依存者ケアを超えた政治的な概念枠組みを提示する。

Care and Caring Relationships: A Political Account

Should care be understood exclusively as the work done to meet the basic needs of dependents such as children or as a broader set of practices in which people in different kinds of relationships...

jesp.org
71
社会的役割と免責される無知 Wells, E. (2026). Social roles and exculpatory ignorance. J Ethics Soc Philos, 31(6), 826–859. doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i6.… 「自分は仕事をしただけで、悪いとは知らなかった」という弁明が、実際に責任を軽減する場合を考察する。 #無知学

Social Roles and Exculpatory Ignorance

People sometimes attempt to avoid blame with the following excuse: “I didn’t know I was doing anything wrong; I was just doing my job.” I argue that this excuse points towards a distinctive form of...

jesp.org
1
88
貯蓄、補償、第一世代 Wiseman, M. (2026). Just savings, compensation, and the first generation. J Ethics Soc Philos, 31(6). doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i6.… 「補償付き貯蓄原理」では、第一世代が行う貯蓄を同時代に生きる後続世代が補償。公正な基本構造の形成に必要な貯蓄を合理的に選択できる。

Just Savings, Compensation, and the First Generation

The just savings principle is the centerpiece of John Rawls’s account of intergenerational justice. Yet it is hard to see why the parties in the original position could accept it, for it imposes net...

jesp.org
1
242
中心からの眺め――客観的自己の再発見 Weber, C. (2026). The view from the centre: Recovering Nagel's objective self. Anal Philos. doi.org/10.1111/phib.70026 一人称代名詞を指標詞として説明する意味論的診断をネーゲルの批判から擁護し、ルイスの中心化世界を用いて主観的／客観的内容を分解。
The View From the Centre: Recovering Nagel's Objective Self

The View From the Centre: Recovering Nagel's Objective Self

Thomas Nagel highlighted a puzzle in accommodating the subjective fact that I am TN within an objective, centerless conception of reality. He rejected the “semantic diagnosis,” which treats “I” as...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com
47
真に「公共的」なAIとは何か Harel, A., et al. (2026). Genuinely public AI. Legal Theory, 32. doi.org/10.1017/S13523252261… アルゴリズム行政の正統性論を、精度・差別問題から、参加機会の確保や異議申立て制度の整備など、政治的権威の問題へ拡張。
3
100
技術中心的認識的不正義 Della Croce, Y. (2026). Technocentric epistemic injustice beyond identity-based prejudice. Philos & Tech, 39. doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-0… 補助・代替コミュニケーションを用いる人々の発言が、健常者型の発話や技術の優越視によって信用を失う仕組みを分析。
Technocentric Epistemic Injustice Beyond Identity-Based Prejudice

Technocentric Epistemic Injustice Beyond Identity-Based Prejudice

Philosophy & Technology - It has been argued that users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are prone to a distinct kind of discrimination called speechism, due to their mode of...

link.springer.com
1
81
理由が多すぎるのはいけないことか Sun, Y. (2026). Are there too many reasons? Synthese, 208. doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-0… 欲求を行為理由の基礎とする理論への「理由過剰」反論に対し、現実の欲求に関する誤りや無知と、その欲求が理由を説明する資格を持つかを区別し、非理想的な欲求基礎説を擁護。
Are there too many reasons?

Are there too many reasons?

Synthese - Many philosophers endorse the view that normative reasons for action are often explained by our desires, but the right kind of desire that warrants reason-explaining status remains a...

link.springer.com
73
偏見はウィトゲンシュタイン的「蝶番命題」ではない Raut, T. (2026). Prejudices are not like hinges. Synthese, 208. doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-0… 偏見は世界像の不可避な基盤ではなく、一般化表現や選択的証拠によって支えられながらも、証拠に照らして合理的評価・批判が可能な信念であると論じる。
Prejudices are not like hinges

Prejudices are not like hinges

Synthese - In a recent essay, Anna Boncompagni (2024) argues that prejudices are hinges that play a normative role of evidential significance. This is meant to account for why prejudices are...

link.springer.com
64
障害の申告の語用論 Purinton, S., & Yap, A. (2026). The pragmatics of disability self-ascriptions. J Ethics Soc Philos, 31(6), 801–825. doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i6.… 障害の自己申告を社会的関係を変える発話行為として分析。また、当事者のためらいを三つの観点で理解する。

The Pragmatics of Disability Self-Ascriptions

Disability self-ascriptions could be treated as descriptive claims: assertions that one satisfies the conditions for counting as disabled. This article focuses on a different function that such...

jesp.org
58
穏健な義務論に対する恣意的閾値批判の論駁 Hanna, N. (2026). Refuting the arbitrary cutoff objection to moderate deontology. J Ethics Soc Philos, 31(6). doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v31i6.… 義務論において行為の許容性が変わる閾値を考えるとき、その閾値は恣意的なのか。そんなことはないと反論。

Refuting the Arbitrary Cutoff Objection to Moderate Deontology

Suppose that you must choose between killing an innocent person or letting others die. Moderate deontology says that when the stakes are high enough in such a case, killing the innocent person...

jesp.org
63
倫理学は進歩する！ Norton, J., & Dellsén, F. (2026). Progress in ethics: Out of the ivory tower. Monist. doi.org/10.1093/monist/onag0… ある現象への理解を深める能力を人々に与える程度に応じて、学問としての倫理学は進歩すると定義する。人の行動を改善する条件を整えるものとしての倫理学。
Progress in Ethics: Out of the Ivory Tower

Progress in Ethics: Out of the Ivory Tower

Abstract. How is progress in the academic discipline of ethics related to improvements in people’s ethical thoughts and behaviors? We propose that there is

academic.oup.com
2
103
医者は患者に炭素排出量の削減を求めよ Jenkins, S. P., & Heer-Stavert, S. (2026). General practitioners should ask patients to reduce their carbon footprints. Bioethics. doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70209 医療の持続可能性を進めるため、患者に生活様式の環境負荷を尋ねる診察モデル「ICE2」を提案。
General Practitioners Should Ask Patients to Reduce Their Carbon Footprints

General Practitioners Should Ask Patients to Reduce Their Carbon Footprints

Climate change is a 21st century problem, and we must be ready to adapt our practices in order to confront it. Current philosophical efforts to reconcile our obligations to make healthcare sustaina...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com
53
ケアは徳なのか？ Shaban-Potter, J. (2026). Is care a virtue? A new account of care's relationship with virtue ethics. J Soc Philos. doi.org/10.1111/josp.70076 ケアは勇気や機知などと並ぶ人格的特性ではなく、そもそもそれらの徳を理解可能にする前提だと論じる。
Is Care a Virtue? A New Account of Care's Relationship With Virtue Ethics

Is Care a Virtue? A New Account of Care's Relationship With Virtue Ethics

This paper aims to address a lingering misconception about an ethics of care: that it is simply a form of virtue ethics that includes the straightforward virtue of care. Care cannot be a standard...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com
3
5
315
Load more