Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox) profile picture
Melbourne, Victoria
Joined January 2021
Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)Photo by Lachie Fox (@Lach_fox)
This is about a 1% increase to the sticker price; about a quarter of what it costs to add leather seats to a car! It is far short of the 25% price increase the FCAI is claiming. And even using this figure is misleading - it counts the costs, but not the benefits.
1
4
310
Consumers may pay 1% more for a car, but get a lot for their money in better tech + lower running costs. Gov estimates are that consumers will save $108 billion in fuel savings to 2050. I see no reason to dispute this - consumers will definitely be better off in the long term
2
5
280
And everyone benefits from lower emissions - which is the point of this policy to begin with.
4
245
In 2021, we published modelling of ambitious emissions standards: grattan.edu.au/wp-content/up… We modelled similar, slightly more ambitious targets than what the government has proposed. Using conservative assumptions, we found the average new car may increase in price by about ~$500
2
3
262
We know that in most cases manufacturers will choose to sell efficient cars instead of paying a penalty. How do we know this? Because: a) every international scheme shows this is what car companies choose to do to meet targets; and b) we, and many others have modelled this.
1
6
264
The article suggests that the $38b figure is calculated on the assumption that no-one - vehicle manufacturers or consumers - change their behaviour. Instead, manufacturers simply pay the penalty cost, and Australians continue to buy inefficient vehicles.
1
4
262
This assumption is plainly wrong. Emission standards are in place in many countries. There are no examples anywhere in the world where this assumption remotely holds true. The point of the policy is to incentivise the sale of more efficient cars; and this works overseas.
1
6
254
$38b is a lot of money. About 1 million vehicles are sold each year in Aus; $38b over 5 million assumes that the average price of a car would go up by $7-8k, or ~20-25%. (the av new car is $40-50k).
1
4
270
We finally have a new vehicle fuel efficiency standard! It's better than expected - targets are on a trajectory to 0 by 2035, needed for net zero. But there's some confusion that it will make vehicles heavier. This is unlikely, and worth clearing up. A long-ish thread:
2
2
3
13
4,861
All in all; it would be surprising if manufacturers made vehicles heavier in response to targets. There may be some shifting between vehicle types (caused by the fact there are two standards); but there is limited scope for this, given SUVs/LCVs are already 75% of the fleet.
2
3
210
Edit - seems as though the categories of passenger / light commercial place SUVs in the passenger category (contrary to above). So there may be more scope to shift between categories than I had thought. This is not great - perhaps gov could address in 2026 review.
1
7
222