Professor at Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
Poland
Joined March 2012
- Tweets116
- Following139
- Followers111
- Likes30
The "most accurate" LLM for systematic-review screening silently discarded 63% of the relevant papers.
Our new open-access paper @ISTJrnal (Information and Software Technology) shows why standard metrics mislead — and what to use instead. 🧵
doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.202…
LLM4SCREENLIT = recommendations for authors AND a one-page checklist for editors/reviewers, split by study type (benchmarking vs deployment). Validated on 9 LLMs × 24 SE secondary studies (34,528 articles). With Prof. Barbara Kitchenham & @ProfMShepperd .
Everything is open:
📄 Paper (CC-BY): doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.202…
🧰 Replication package — R/Python metric scripts + fillable checklist: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.…
Use it and adapt it.
Personalized Share Link to our new @ISTJrnal paper "Test case prioritization: A systematic review using snowballing and TCPFramework with approach combinators":
authors.elsevier.com/a/1me%7…
New paper in Information & Software Technology🚀
We introduce "approach combinators"—ensemble Test Case Prioritization methods improving regression testing.💡
By T. Chojnacki & @LechMadeyski
🔗 doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.202…
#SoftwareTesting #TestCasePrioritization #SoftwareEngineering
📊 How does it work?
The graphical abstract below presents a simplified view of our framework.
Test suites are passed through different combinations of simple models to produce a highly efficient test ordering—without the need for heavy computation.
👇
💡 The Results:
By integrating existing strategies, approach combinators consistently improve regression testing.
The ultimate takeaway? We achieve state-of-the-art TCP performance across diverse software projects! 🏆
#QA #CICD #AcademicTwitter
Exciting! e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal (e-informatyka.pl/) just published "Guidelines for Conducting Action Research Studies in Software Engineering" by @MiroslawStaron 👉🏼doi.org/10.37190/e-Inf250105
Let's make 2025 an #ActionResearch year in #SoftwareEngineering
Happy to share the effect of research visit at BTH and collaboration with @wnukkris et al. We analyzed usage of requirements attributes in industry (2 industrial case studies) & literature👉🏼 doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70… or madeyski.e-informatyka.pl/do… #requirementsengineering #requirements
Interested in “Recommendations for analysing and meta-analysing small sample size software engineering experiments”? 👉🏼My joint paper doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-1… with Prof. Kitchenham in @emsejournal
#MetaAnalysis #EffectSize #NonParametric #ReproducibleResearch #SoftwareEngineering
Tests based on pˆ always had better or equal power than tests based on Cliff’s d, and across all but one simulation condition, pˆ Type 1 error rates were less biased.