WEB3 CONTENT NINJA 📣|| Ambassador @maplefinance ||
DM for collab
Joined November 2023
- Tweets17.6K
- Following1.5K
- Followers1.1K
- Likes61.2K
Pinned Tweet
There was a time I joined Web3 because a friend said "guy you go make money" and I had zero clue about the whole thing.
USDT, wallets, meme contests, threads I barely understood, I was just trying to keep up.
I remember the frustration of putting out content, entering contest after contest and not getting selected.
Some weeks it felt like I was shouting into nothing.
I kept showing up, learning, creating.
Then the best happened through @binance
I made my first 3 figures in Web3.
$150, after 2 years.
It doesn't sound much on paper, but after two years of grinding, it felt like proof and meant a lot to me.
That's how Binance came through for me, not just a platform I use, but the place where my work finally started paying off.
To the guy who almost gave up more times than I can count, we're just getting started. 💪
You will think your girlfriend is just joking with the chief and sugar daddy meme she do post, until she actually meet one.
You go learn 😂
Happy Sunday 🤝
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
DeFi strategies can be powerful, but the process of setting them up can sometimes be more complicated than the strategy itself.
That is where @nine_summits comes in.
With its seamless looping feature, users can build leveraged positions on fxSAVE and USDC through Morpho without having to manually repeat every step.
Instead of swapping, depositing, borrowing and starting the process all over again, 9Summits brings the entire loop into one simple interface.
In the image below, a 10,000 USDC input creates an 8.3x leveraged fxSAVE position.
You can see everything before executing the transaction:
→ Collateral
→ Borrowed USDC
→ LTV
→ Health factor
→ Borrow APR
→ fxSAVE APR
→ Loop APR
→ The complete loop path
I also like that the interface shows where the transaction is going and how the position changes. You are not just clicking “loop” and hoping for the best.
9Summits also compares available venues and supports native minting, which can help improve execution and reduce unnecessary slippage.
This is the kind of UX that makes advanced DeFi strategies easier to access.
The strategy can still be complex under the hood.
The experience does not have to be.
Swap. Loop. Manage your position.
All from one place.
Try 9Swap → swap.9summits.io/
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
Going to TOKEN2049 Singapore?
We’re hosting a curated Oktoberfest event on Oct 8 for the prediction market crowd.
Good beer, good food, and a chance to meet people across the space.
Spots are limited. Apply here ↓
luma.com/gptr5rfu
made this video as my entry for @Garrionchain contest by @degenBRO__
robinhood:0xdddf7ab756c35b4d0537825497e6932780710241 moon?
yhh… $Garri moon.
Create an intro video for $GARRI token
Two winners $50 each
less than 24 hours⏳
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
The part about PCE and NFP stood out to me.
If both come in hotter than expected, yields could keep pushing higher and put more pressure on risk markets. But if the numbers come in softer, that could give risk assets some room to breathe.
Definitely something I’ll be watching closely.
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
@0xhazels Contribution Score
How It Works:
→ Score is based on your X content about @0xhazels + the quality/authenticity of engagement it gets.
→ Only 1 post/day counts, max 7 scored posts/week. Post more than that and your best-performing one will be picked.
→ Scoring weighs content quality, relevance and genuine engagement, not just raw numbers.
→ Avoid tagging multiple projects in one post to farm several leaderboards at once, this can significantly cut your points.
→ Posts need real Hazels-related substance.
Low-effort or unrelated mentions may score little to nothing.
→ Original thoughts are encouraged. AI for grammar, formatting, research or visuals is fine but the core message should be your own voice.
→ Your activity across the ecosystem counts too genuine replies and engagement with @0xhazels posts factor into your score.
→ Interactions with the Hazels team may also matter. Consistent, relevant participation outweighs repetitive or low-quality engagement.
Relevance, quality, consistency and authenticity > volume
See you on the leaderboard 👀
GM fam
gHazels
For the past six months, @Rosaaa an NFT founder has been quietly building something called Hazels.
Before explaining what it is, he opened with a critique most Web3 founders won't want to hear.
HIS POINT: a lot of founders are very good at getting attention.
They're just not very good at deserving it.
He says he has watched the same playbook repeat for years.
- Find creators
- Borrow their attention
- Turn that attention into numbers.
- Turn those numbers into leverage.
And once a project has gotten what it came for, the deal quietly changes.
He is clear that this isn't a theory he came up with sitting in a founder's chair.
He learned it from being on the other side of the table, as an influencer who gave projects his name, his audience, his reputation and his attention.
Projects needed him.
They got what they wanted, then the rules changed.
He points to a familiar pattern across the space: methods like FCFS, Select and Raffle.
These reduce who actually gets access when real opportunity arrives.
His words capture it well: "Funny how community gets smaller the moment an opportunity gets bigger."
His response wasn't another thread complaining about it.
He says someone had to write the rules before the value arrives and show how the business should actually be done, so instead of writing about the problem, he built what he calls the solution. @0xhazels
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
TLDR: BasePad (basepad.si)
@basepadsi is a new token launchpad built on Base, aimed at an era they call "Super Intelligence"
AI agents that don't just answer prompts, but act on their own: holding wallets, making decisions, and transacting independently.
CORE ARGUMENTS: If AI agents are going to transact at scale, they need open, permissionless rails blockchains, not traditional finance, which requires accounts, approvals and human gatekeeping.
They chose Base specifically for its low fees, fast blocks and existing builder activity.
What the product actually does:
➤ One transaction deploys a fixed-supply ERC-20 token, opens a Uniswap v4 pool at a chosen market cap and locks 100% of the liquidity permanently, no one, not even the creator or BasePad itself, can withdraw it.
➤ Launching only costs gas.
➤ Creators choose a 1% or 3% trading fee; 95% of collected fees go to the creator, 5% to BasePad, this split is hard-coded with no admin key, no owner, no upgrade path
➤ Agents (AI, not just humans) can launch tokens the same way.
No signup, no API key, just a direct contract call, with machine-readable docs (llms.txt, JSON)
Launch numbers (their own reported stats, first 90 minutes): 44 tokens launched, $360K+ in trading volume, 2,772 trades, 539 traders.
Basically, they're betting on fairness through code, not promises.
Same rules for humans and AI agents, liquidity locked by contract instead of trust.
TLDR: BasePad (basepad.si)
@basepadsi is a new token launchpad built on Base, aimed at an era they call "Super Intelligence"
AI agents that don't just answer prompts, but act on their own: holding wallets, making decisions, and transacting independently.
CORE ARGUMENTS: If AI agents are going to transact at scale, they need open, permissionless rails blockchains, not traditional finance, which requires accounts, approvals and human gatekeeping.
They chose Base specifically for its low fees, fast blocks and existing builder activity.
What the product actually does:
➤ One transaction deploys a fixed-supply ERC-20 token, opens a Uniswap v4 pool at a chosen market cap and locks 100% of the liquidity permanently, no one, not even the creator or BasePad itself, can withdraw it.
➤ Launching only costs gas.
➤ Creators choose a 1% or 3% trading fee; 95% of collected fees go to the creator, 5% to BasePad, this split is hard-coded with no admin key, no owner, no upgrade path
➤ Agents (AI, not just humans) can launch tokens the same way.
No signup, no API key, just a direct contract call, with machine-readable docs (llms.txt, JSON)
Launch numbers (their own reported stats, first 90 minutes): 44 tokens launched, $360K+ in trading volume, 2,772 trades, 539 traders.
Basically, they're betting on fairness through code, not promises.
Same rules for humans and AI agents, liquidity locked by contract instead of trust.
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
Our smart contracts have been audited by @zenith256, with all findings resolved and fixes verified.
Thanks to the Zenith team for their thorough review as we prepare for launch.
Zenith Auditors recently completed an audit for Lattica, the liquidity layer of informational finance.
All findings have been resolved.
Huge shoutout to the @Lattica team for their commitment to security!
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
I’m @0xhazels Creator
Campaign Details:
Reward Pool → $7,500 USDT
Campaign Type → Contribution
Eligibility → Top 100 Creators
Start → Oct 2, 2026 · 17:00 UTC
End → Nov 3, 2026 · 00:00 UTC
#WEAREHAZELS
Get in 👇🏻
New Creator Campaign | @0xhazels
$7,500 USDT Hazels Creator Campaign is now live:
Campaign Details:
Reward Pool → $7,500 USDT
Campaign Type → Contribution
Eligibility → Top 100 Creators
Start → Oct 2, 2026 · 17:00 UTC
End → Nov 3, 2026 · 00:00 UTC
Applications on Studio ↓
For the past six months, @Rosaaa an NFT founder has been quietly building something called Hazels.
Before explaining what it is, he opened with a critique most Web3 founders won't want to hear.
HIS POINT: a lot of founders are very good at getting attention.
They're just not very good at deserving it.
He says he has watched the same playbook repeat for years.
- Find creators
- Borrow their attention
- Turn that attention into numbers.
- Turn those numbers into leverage.
And once a project has gotten what it came for, the deal quietly changes.
He is clear that this isn't a theory he came up with sitting in a founder's chair.
He learned it from being on the other side of the table, as an influencer who gave projects his name, his audience, his reputation and his attention.
Projects needed him.
They got what they wanted, then the rules changed.
He points to a familiar pattern across the space: methods like FCFS, Select and Raffle.
These reduce who actually gets access when real opportunity arrives.
His words capture it well: "Funny how community gets smaller the moment an opportunity gets bigger."
His response wasn't another thread complaining about it.
He says someone had to write the rules before the value arrives and show how the business should actually be done, so instead of writing about the problem, he built what he calls the solution. @0xhazels
I’m @0xhazels Creator
Campaign Details:
Reward Pool → $7,500 USDT
Campaign Type → Contribution
Eligibility → Top 100 Creators
Start → Oct 2, 2026 · 17:00 UTC
End → Nov 3, 2026 · 00:00 UTC
#WEAREHAZELS
Get in 👇🏻
New Creator Campaign | @0xhazels
$7,500 USDT Hazels Creator Campaign is now live:
Campaign Details:
Reward Pool → $7,500 USDT
Campaign Type → Contribution
Eligibility → Top 100 Creators
Start → Oct 2, 2026 · 17:00 UTC
End → Nov 3, 2026 · 00:00 UTC
Applications on Studio ↓
CALEB | L3NIS retweeted
$50 to rage bait you?
I'm happy this tweet isn't getting the engagement you hoped for.
2023 me would've jumped on this,
but nah, I'm too big for that.
As you were. @Kelvinoyibo
