Pinned Tweet
This is what my tabs usually looked like whenever I was checking the market:
Dexscreener
Portfolio
Wallet tracker
Twitter
Bridge
5 tabs.
5 different loads.
1 brain.
Then @zerion web app entered the chat.
1 tab.
app.zerion.io
Me and the boyz speedrunning our way to Kardashev II. @beffjezos gets it. Push civilizational acceleration forward with @projectspherexy
PS//NANMZR
The closer a campaign gets to its finish line, the more I believe consistency needs to go hand in hand with understanding
Over the past few days, I've continued following @projectspherexy and @agentdojo because this isn't just about climbing leaderboards or collecting more points
What caught my attention about Project Sphere is its vision inspired by the Dyson Sphere concept and the Kardashev Scale
Instead of simply talking about a civilization of the future, the project turns the idea of capturing energy from stars into a growth mechanism where individual cells gradually come together to expand the Sphere
$SPHERE is scheduled to launch on Solana on November 3, while its campaign on @rarelistio is also entering its final days
One thing I keep reminding myself is not to show up only when rewards are about to be distributed
Understand what you're participating in and pay attention to how the team actually delivers
Consistency matters, but meaningful participation matters even more
The first star is already waiting.
$SPHERE arrives on Solana on November 3.
Until then, there is no official token.
DonBi retweeted
The first star is already waiting.
$SPHERE arrives on Solana on November 3.
Until then, there is no official token.
Something interesting is happening with Injective that deserves more attention
The Injective Trench Treasury has acquired 5% of the total $RUNNER supply from @runupdotfun
But I think the bigger story here is not the acquisition itself
It is what RunUp is trying to build around $INJ
→ Trading fees are used to fund onchain treasury strategies
→ Profits support token buybacks
→ Holders can earn $INJ rewards from platform activity
→ Solana users can now launch tokens paired with $INJ
One detail worth highlighting is that RunUp's initial launch attracted more than 30,000 unique users to the Injective ecosystem
That is the kind of growth that matters
Not just attracting attention but creating actual reasons for new users to interact with Injective
The Trench Treasury has also acquired 10% of @NinjaCatSF which shows a clear direction
Injective wants to support projects that create real demand and utility for $INJ
I believe this is a more interesting way to grow an ecosystem than simply chasing short term hype
I'm early to @Graildotfamily.
Private launches on Ethereum, powered by Railgun.
g(rail)
Most people look at an ETF as a way to buy an asset, but $INJC adds another layer to the story
Canary Capital's proposed INJ Staked ETF aims to bring $INJ to Nasdaq while staking up to 90% of its holdings
Here is why I think this matters
→ Traditional investors could gain exposure to $INJ through familiar brokerage accounts without managing crypto wallets
→ Staking rewards could accumulate in the fund's NAV, giving investors exposure to both INJ price movements and staking returns
→ BitGo will serve as custodian, adding an institutional custody layer
But there is an important tradeoff
Holding $INJC is not the same as owning $INJ directly
You cannot use the tokens in Injective's ecosystem, participate in governance in the same way, or freely move them between wallets
My takeaway is that INJC is less about changing how crypto natives hold INJ and more about making Injective accessible to a different class of investors
The real test will be whether traditional market access translates into sustained demand
Oil has futures
Electricity has futures
Now AI compute has them too
Injective launched a perp market on the Super Intelligence Compute Index, tracking rental prices of 5 Nvidia GPUs (H100 is 40% of it)
Most people will see this as another thing to bet on
I think the real signal is different
A product only gets a futures market when people need to hedge its price
AI teams rent compute and fear costs going up
GPU providers fear rental prices going down
Gartner already warned that 80%+ of specialist AI cloud providers may not survive independently by 2030
If that risk is real, someone has to price it
Now there’s an onchain place to do it, with up to 10x leverage
The question isn’t whether traders will use it
It’s whether the people who actually carry compute risk will
Injective keeps listing things that never had a price
Pre-IPO exposure to private companies
The hourly cost of an H100
A basket of GPU rental rates
The Korean won, onchain
None of these are new assets. They’re old things that were hard to access
That’s the real product: a shorter path from “this matters” to “I can trade it”
INJ sits at the end of that path. Activity creates revenue, revenue funds the monthly BuyBack, and the INJ bought gets burned. 7.2M+ burned so far
The test I’d use: is that revenue coming from markets people actually trade, or from incentives? A burn funded by real usage and a burn funded by hype look identical on a chart
The weak spot is simple. A market nobody trades is just a listing
Everyone will read this Injective news as a bullish headline
I read it as a checklist
An SEC-registered transfer agent and CFTC-regulated INJ futures prove the paperwork exists
They don’t prove anyone is using it
I stopped trusting announcements a while ago and started trusting evidence
So here are the three things I’m watching:
Does a real issuer put a tokenized security on Injective
Does the transfer agent actually record ownership for it
Does volume show up from users outside crypto
If those stay empty over the next few quarters, this was a nice license collection
If they fill up, this was early infrastructure, and the market slept on the boring part
I’ll check back on this post then
Most crypto projects treat regulation as a threat to survive
@injective seems to treat it as infrastructure to build
This month its CEO sat down with the White House, SEC and CFTC, with legal, policy and research leads next to him
Two details matter more than the meeting itself:
An SEC-registered transfer agent, which keeps the official record of who owns tokenized securities
injective-protocol:native futures listed on CFTC-regulated US markets
My take: tokenization stopped being a tech problem a while ago, since any chain can issue a token
The hard part is who legally records ownership, because that is what regulators and institutions actually care about
A transfer agent license is boring paperwork, and that is exactly why it’s a moat
The open question is adoption: registration doesn’t guarantee real assets will be issued there
But in the next cycle, the edge may go to whoever did the paperwork early, not whoever shouted the loudest
I think one of the biggest mistakes in RWA is treating every dollar onchain as the same kind of adoption
Injective is tracking around $1 06B in represented real estate assets according to RWA xyz data from October 23
That is roughly 67 5% of the tracked tokenized real estate market
But most of this comes from PAPL0 mortgage records linked to existing residential loans not tokenized homes available for retail investors to buy
Personally I see this as two different milestones
Putting mortgage records onchain can improve how financial data is recorded verified and analyzed
Making property rights or mortgage exposure transferable onchain is a different challenge involving legal ownership settlement and market access
The first can be valuable without automatically delivering the second
That is why I would not judge Injective’s RWA progress by the headline figure alone
I would also watch how these records evolve and whether more financial activity can eventually build on top of this infrastructure
For me the bigger question is not how much RWA a chain reports but what users can actually do with it
The real competition in tokenized finance isn't about who can put assets onchain first
It's about who can make those assets useful once they're there
That's where I think @injective has an interesting advantage
Most tokenized assets still have limited utility beyond representing ownership
Injective is building toward something more connected
→ SEC registered transfer agent for official securities ownership records
→ Injective Mint for compliant asset issuance
→ 135 RWA perpetual markets across equities, commodities, FX and indices
→ Over $5.3B in cumulative RWA perp volume and $1B+ in tokenized RWA value onchain
The bigger picture is the connection between issuance, ownership records, trading and collateral
If these functions operate within a compatible regulatory framework, tokenized assets could become active financial instruments rather than digital representations sitting idle in wallets
Regulatory progress in the US still matters, and the outcome is not guaranteed
But my takeaway is simple
The winners in tokenized finance may not be the chains with the most assets, but the ones that give those assets the most ways to be used
DonBi retweeted
mapping the world is one thing
controlling where that data goes is another 👀
one underrated detail in @vangrid_io's enterprise docs
spatial data can be routed across US, EU and APAC regions, with cross-region access requiring explicit setup
sounds like a small technical detail
but for companies working with physical infrastructure, data control matters just as much as data quality
that's something worth getting right early
🤝 Paid partnership
DonBi retweeted
77% of top 100 callout leaderboard is farmers on pumpfun
they claimed more callout reward than they make money from trading
top 10 is all farmers, zero actual traders with higher PNL than callout rewards
so basically all the fees you paid to pumpfun to farm the airdrop is going to top 100 farming callout rewards instead of you.
DonBi retweeted
The initial 1.1M $GRVT burn set a clear tone onchain, but the product mechanics are where the real value lies.
👀 @grvt_io
The most expensive mistake in trading is letting collateral sit idle. You shouldnt have to forfeit yield just because you need margin for a trade.
Combining eligible earn balances with active execution in GRVT 2.0 directly targets that exact inefficiency.
Margin shouldn't sit frozen, it should generate while you trade.
DonBi retweeted
Imagine a scenario where your mobile device assists a robot in determining its location.
This is essentially the focus of @vangrid_io's efforts. The process entails capturing a location with a mobile device, thereby creating a three-dimensional representation of the site. There is no need for expensive mapping rigs. The device itself is designed to blur faces and license plates. Additionally, each capture is anchored in Base, enabling anyone to verify the origin of the data.
Maps quickly become outdated. Streets undergo changes, shops are relocated, and items are reorganized. Fresh captures from regular people keep up with that way better.
Robots require accurate environmental perception to make effective decisions. Vangrid is addressing this unmet need, and its use of mobile devices is a key factor in my interest in the company.
Would you consider scanning a location with your mobile device if it contributed to the development of robotics?
DonBi retweeted
I spent a long time looking for a place where I could trade and earn simultaneously, without having to move funds between accounts.
@grvt_io solves exactly that. It’s a self-custodial platform where a single balance functions as both trading margin and an earning balance at the same time. Crypto, stocks, gold, and commodities all in one place, with leverage up to 50x.
The key term here is "self-custodial"
My assets are under *my* key not the exchange's key.
And that’s just the current version. GRVT 2.0 is coming at the end of November
DonBi retweeted
What is @Americanfort_io doing differently?
Most crypto wallets expose one permanent address. AmericanFortress is building a privacy layer around readable names and transactionspecific addresses.
The current model:
1. One FortressName
2. 13 integrated networks
3. A fresh onetime address for each payment
4. Native onchain settlement
5. No mixers or pooled funds
The name remains recognizable to users. The underlying receiving address changes, making separate payments harder for outside observers to connect.
Then comes SafeSend.
Zeroknowledge proofs are being developed to let users verify specific transaction information without revealing their entire financial history.
An exchange may need proof of one payment.
An auditor may need selected records.
A competitor does not need to see payroll, suppliers or treasury activity.
AmericanFortress is also researching postquantum wallet protection through ZKPoSP and QBIP-32, with the goal of protecting existing wallet ownership without forcing users to move their funds.
The opportunity is clear:
Readable identity for humans.
Onetime addresses for privacy.
Selective disclosure for accountability.
Postquantum research for longterm security.
The challenge is deployment. SafeSend and postquantum features still need broader integrations, independent scrutiny and realworld adoption.
Privacy infrastructure succeeds when users barely notice the cryptography.
They type a name.
The payment reaches the correct person.
The blockchain verifies it.
Unrelated financial history stays private.
DonBi retweeted
Spent some time in TERA's city and the rig raid is the part that stuck with me.
You walk up to a rig in the middle of a plaza and its health bar is split into five chunks. Then everyone nearby starts shooting at once. Watching it drain while other players are doing the exact same thing makes you rethink your timing fast.
That's the actual question the mechanic asks: hit early and risk being outplayed, or wait and risk someone else finishing it first?
To be clear, the raiding is what's playable now. On-chain extraction and payouts are still in development.
teraworld.xyz @Tera_Map
Opened Land #1038 on the TERA preview and the card says it all: Gold, Moon tier, tracks wGLD.
So this one isn't just a nice little island with pine trees and a few cabins. Its resource type is gold, and the plan is for that to connect to a gold stock token in the treasury. Rarity is meant to decide its share of future rewards.
Worth being clear on what's live: the playable city is. The treasury, extraction and payouts are still in development, and stock tokens are derivatives, not shares.
Still, seeing a parcel with a resource and a rarity printed on it makes the idea easier to follow than any whitepaper section.
@Tera_Map · teraworld.xyz
DonBi retweeted
You don’t need to be top 10.
Top 150 shares $100,000.
Plus 120 lottery winners.
Daily tasks = better rank + more tickets.
Simple system. Long campaign. Real rewards.
$150K $SWEEP until Christmas.
train.actionmodel.com
Sign up with my referral code-STGTOTHETOP
🤖 Made with AI
