Lennard (@Lennard4567) header
Lennard (@Lennard4567) profile picture

Why buy Bitcoin? Why wouldn't you want to buy a digital monopoly, which appreciates at mid-double-digit rates per year?

Joined June 2023
Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)Photo by Lennard (@Lennard4567)
I love the ambiguity behind this abbreviation.
In time, everything before Satoshi will be viewed as BS.
35
8,302
Lennard retweeted
Aleksandr M Ugolev dedicated his LIFE to researching digestion He is known as the “Grandfather of Digestion” His experiments say you should eat Raw Meat, not Cooked. Here’s why: He put 2 frogs in gastric juice. One was RAW. One was COOKED. At first, the cooked frog started breaking down faster. But after 2–3 days… The RAW frog was completely gone. Fully digested. The cooked frog was STILL THERE. Why? Because raw meat contains active enzymes that help digest the meat from the inside. Your stomach acid activates them. So raw meat is attacked from BOTH sides: - Your stomach digests it from the outside - The meat digests itself from the inside But cooking destroys these enzymes. Then your body has to do all the work alone. Ugolev called this “induced autolysis.” In simple words: RAW MEAT DIGESTS ITSELF. COOKED MEAT DOESN’T. They tell you cooking makes meat easier to digest. Ugolev’s experiment showed the opposite. 🔥 Heat destroys the food ❌ 🥩 Raw meat works WITH your body ✅ Nature already designed the perfect digestion system. Stop destroying it with fire. Page 19-21 of the book “Theory of Adequate Nutrition” by A M Ugolev. It’s in Russian but you can translate it. Contains all his experiments & studies. kntu-tk.narod.ru/doc/ugolev.…
1
2
13
299
Anthropic posted one of the greatest last 12 months in the history of business! BUT they can 1000x again, here’s how:
Corporate AI spending and AI use (ex. frontiers) can 1000x again, but a lot of people working in finance, law, consulting have a hard time understanding this. Here’s why: these individuals are amongst the hardest working and brightest in the workforce. They are completely detached from the average worker. The average worker: doesn’t want to go to work, if he goes to work he’s super unproductive and dodges responsibility as often as possible, calls in sick whenever he feels like it and isn’t even good at his job to begin with. Further Gen Z doesn’t really want to work and Boomers are too incompetent to use the internet or technology, leading to greater inefficiency. If you don’t believe me AI can 1000x again easily, just take a look at what’s happening right now. Microsoft is laying of, or wants to lay of a huge number of its employees. Microsoft’s employees are arguably amongst the brightest and hardest working employees in the workforce. Yet it is more lukrative form Microsoft to let them go and spend the money on GPUs! We will see the 1000x in a rollout of enterprise AI, replacing most adult day care jobs one after another. Often this is to hard to grasp for high performance people, because they are too biased looking at things from their own lense and the only people they know are other hardworking friends and colleagues. I encourage you, go look beyond your immediate circle and try talking to some average workers or companies. You quickly realize there is so much inefficiency around its staggering. Than what is really holding back adoption is people not knowing how to use it properly, yet these same people own and manage most of the businesses. Finally in the western demographics we have a huge gap in workforce, because of birth rates, showing in more old people leaving the workforce than young people joining the job market. If we want to keep the level of products and services available to the market, the only effective solution so far has been automation. That’s the tweet, to and do your own investigation. It’s truly mind boggling
55
Corporate AI spending and AI use (ex. frontiers) can 1000x again, but a lot of people working in finance, law, consulting have a hard time understanding this. Here’s why: these individuals are amongst the hardest working and brightest in the workforce. They are completely detached from the average worker. The average worker: doesn’t want to go to work, if he goes to work he’s super unproductive and dodges responsibility as often as possible, calls in sick whenever he feels like it and isn’t even good at his job to begin with. Further Gen Z doesn’t really want to work and Boomers are too incompetent to use the internet or technology, leading to greater inefficiency. If you don’t believe me AI can 1000x again easily, just take a look at what’s happening right now. Microsoft is laying of, or wants to lay of a huge number of its employees. Microsoft’s employees are arguably amongst the brightest and hardest working employees in the workforce. Yet it is more lukrative form Microsoft to let them go and spend the money on GPUs! We will see the 1000x in a rollout of enterprise AI, replacing most adult day care jobs one after another. Often this is to hard to grasp for high performance people, because they are too biased looking at things from their own lense and the only people they know are other hardworking friends and colleagues. I encourage you, go look beyond your immediate circle and try talking to some average workers or companies. You quickly realize there is so much inefficiency around its staggering. Than what is really holding back adoption is people not knowing how to use it properly, yet these same people own and manage most of the businesses. Finally in the western demographics we have a huge gap in workforce, because of birth rates, showing in more old people leaving the workforce than young people joining the job market. If we want to keep the level of products and services available to the market, the only effective solution so far has been automation. That’s the tweet, to and do your own investigation. It’s truly mind boggling
1
86
rebalanced the colo exposure to 50/50 in usd exposure terms. > $WULF up on good S1 by ANT > all of wulf end tenants is basically ANT > $CIFR cheap here based on cap rate/NOI multiple; BUT texas elections will be important If they won’t hinder datacenters dramatically in texas cifrs pipeline will hold huge value not priced in the stock at all
Long $Cifr and $WULF only, out of the CoLo space right now
1
1
5
327
financed by selling wulf and buying cifr. a little capital drawn out of the trade. will prob add substantially (the other 50%; double the positions) after elections and amazon earnings
1
32
Replying to @elonmusk
@elonmusk dunking on $Iren setting below 1x 2027 ARR. just take a look at $TSLA
1
1
180
@jiahanjimliu why do you even own tesla stock, please tell me the payback on tesla stock at its current valuations. operating profit is fine for sake of simplicity
1
1
165
GM, ich bin BitBeller und ich mache jeden Tag ein Video, bis Bitcoin auf 1.000.000 Dollar geht. Heute ist Tag 217 und du bist nicht bullish genug. LFG!
12
5
118
2,075
Lennard retweeted
its lowkey a war on people with the light still in their eyes
426
16,713
757
102,302
1,551,753
Lennard retweeted
Jeffrey Yan my GOAT
29
411
23
3,710
103,844
exited $CLSK > If we take last deals economics and apply a 9% cap rate, there is no upside left > A 9% cap rate is below what market implies for peers based in EV/NOI, for example $CIFR and $WULF both below 10x EV/NOI —> market implied cap rate larger than 10%
1
223
re-entered $SPCX short position
60
for men the hymen breaks when they get a 9 to 5
Replying to @still_critical
the soul has a hymen too
1
89
lmao 🤣 but true i guess
Feels like the public interpretation is all wrong… I’m pretty sure $MSFT backing out on NScale deal is bullish for Neoclouds like $NBIS or even $IREN with energized capacity with Microsoft? Pretend Microsoft just ate a bunch of Chipotle burittos: - They order toilet paper delivery scheduled Q1 2027 - NScale says: sorry 3-4+ year delay of the toilet paper (into 2030’s) because of UK grid constraints - Microsoft still urgently needs toilet paper so they will get it elsewhere The cancellation does send warnings about what happens if a Neocloud can’t execute on contracted demand. But that just makes the other toilet paper sellers more valuable since Microsoft will go elsewhere for supply.
1
49
$IREN a message for the board.
IREN’s AGM closes 23 November. I’m voting against say-on-pay and against Guzowski’s re-election, and for the buybacks. My reasons, and one detail on the ballot that will void your vote if you miss it 👇
124
Meine Frau will die Scheidung // Tag 209
9
4
61
4,113
Long $Cifr and $WULF only, out of the CoLo space right now
1
1
628
also own some $CLSK but hedged and will sell if there is no use of the exclusivity by meta soon! maybe end of Nov
199
Lennard retweeted
What's the difference between a #neocloud and what $WULF does? CEO @PaulBPrager breaks it down in his recent interview with @SullyCNBC on @CNBC. Watch the full replay below.
13
43
11
371
29,445
I already own 50% of the target position. Family and I haven been net buyer under $15. Right now Wulf trades around the value of the existing contracts with an 8% cap rate and 9% cap rate for Ant without an IG backstop yet and longest to RFS date. Looking to buy the other 50% at a 20-30% discount to contracted or when macro improved/ clears up. I have no issues for paying up a little for the remaining 50%, when the worst is behind us. Short term I don’t know what the market will do, fundamentally its rather cheap right now. And i expect that SP materially improves until EOY 2027. So short term iam reluctant to add more, but in a 12-18 months basis this looks like a top buy to me.
Replying to @Lennard4567
Can I add wulf here? Added other stuff last three days
1
3
102
Our Colocation “Basket” only holds $CIFR and $WULF now as I see them as the highest quality names in the sector. What I like about $CIFR is the tenant covers cost inflation in the other two projects. Cipher operates the majority of the Sites in Texas so Tera Wulf adds some geographical diversification in the basket. Chiper seems to stay in the highest IG class with HS and build from scratch. Wulf cuts the middle man in went for ANT at a higher rent and also develops brownfield at a superior PUE. What I dislike about both stocks is the dilution overhang from convertible notes. What I like about both stocks is the management, I think the Wulf management has been super transparent with their reasoning and way of thinking about shareholder returns, especially the CFO. Ciphers management to me seems more to stress the assets and quality of those, since that’s what stands out about ciphers, best tenants, triple net, cost overrun protection and a potential huge pipeline. I own both in a fairly simple 50/50 mix.
1
174