Independent Writer & Consultant, Former Ruckus Panelist on KCPT, Former U.S. Senate Candidate, Former Academic/Educator, PhD
Overland Park, KS, US
Joined November 2009
- Tweets7.1K
- Following313
- Followers1.4K
- Likes4.8K
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
Prime example: Efforts to push 💉uptake were not honest
April 2021 story touted only a 0.008% breakthrough rate (link in reply)
When I noted this was inaccurate per research noting vaxxed in trials had persistent virus in swabs, I was attacked & told I was doing a “bad thing”😡
Mark Zuckerberg says it was challenging to censor COVID misinformation because the scientific establishment was frequently wrong, which ultimately undermined public trust:
"Just take some of the stuff around COVID earlier in the pandemic where there were real health implications, but there hadn't been time to fully vet a bunch of the scientific assumptions. Unfortunately, I think a lot of the kind of establishment on that kind of waffled on a bunch of facts and asked for a bunch of things to be censored that, in retrospect, ended up being more debatable or true. That stuff is really tough, right? It really undermines trust."
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
⬇️ This is why…
❌ There will be NO herd immunity - each major variant is different enough to reinfect
❌ Building 💉on a particular variant(s) will fail - it’s like trying to chase a race car on foot… by the time you run to where the car began it’s miles down the road
New Study shows that Covid mutates 2.5x faster rate than fastest known evolving flu virus & 10x more than common cold coronaviruses.
-Sars2 BY FAR the fastest mutating of 28 'endemic viruses' AS YET ANOTHER COVID LIE IS SMASHED ONCE & FOR ALL.
-Warning issued that..
ALT 'Mutates 2.5x faster than flu' COVER IMAGE: article
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
❌ Incorrect analogy: asserting immune system is like a muscle
Immune system is like a military force engaging in intelligence & defense
Ideally it spots an enemy combatant (i.e., virus below infectious threshold) and gathers enough information to ward off a future threat
1/
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
New Qatar preprint shows (as seen with other studies) neither vaccination nor infection provides adequate infection protection
Efficacy for 3 doses over time ⬇️
Orange line I’ve added highlights 0% efficacy
Most of 2022 efficacy below 0 meaning more infections than in unvaxxed
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
March 2021 Walensky said vaxxed did not get infected or carry virus
In testimony she claimed it was true at the time but it was NOT
Article published online Dec 2020 & in print Feb 2021 said vaxxed had persistent virus in nasal swabs & could be infected & spread
(Link in reply)
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
To all doing this…
🛑 Please STOP implying bivalent vax will prevent infections 🤦🏼♀️
XBB.1 neutralization is so poor it cannot be relied upon⬇️↘️
N95 or better respirators are a must in shared air
It’s potentially harmful to only mention the 💉& create false sense of protection
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
⚠️ Why taking more 💉may be problematic & not useful
🔸Negligible neutralization of XBB.1
🔸Hospitalization benefit minuscule
🔸IgG4 immune shift to “tolerance”
🔸More infections among boosted
🔸Vax post infection yields damage
🔸Spike in blood up to 4 wks later
Read on…
1/
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
How many people’s minds (who had diametrically opposed views to yours on Covid-related topics) can you definitively say you were personally able to change with discussion?
78%0
20%1-5
2%5-10
0%I change all the minds!
41 votes • Final results 💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
Troubling❗️Vax after infection weakens immune system 🤯
How exactly do we restore this damaged immune response? 🤔
What are the implications for boosting among those who’ve been infected (which is the vast majority of people)? 😳
Full article link:
cell.com/immunity/pdf/S1074-…
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
🤔💭If you recommended condoms but the public didn’t wear them properly or consistently which allowed pregnancies & STIs to occur, would it be proper to proclaim:
🔸Condoms don’t work!
OR
🔸People did not use the condoms as they should have
Hint: It’s the second one
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
⚠️ Reinfection is dangerous & damaging regardless of whether you are vaccinated
Your risk of death, hospitalization & a variety of conditions is equally elevated with a reinfection even if you are vaxxed & boosted per study below
From important study that shows repeated reinfections amplify risk increase for multiple conditions:
🔸One finding that has not been emphasized is that reinfection raises risk equally regardless of vaccination status ⬇️↘️
nature.com/articles/s41591-0…
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
⚠️ Preprint study reveals concerning interaction
Infection within 21 days of ANY vax associated with elevated stroke risk
J&J exhibited highest risk (after adjustment)
news-medical.net/amp/news/20…
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
The reinfection picture changed drastically is upon the arrival of the Omicron variant in late 2021/early 2022
⬇️ This graph shows substantial natural immunity for those under 65 prior to Omicron
That’s OVER now❗️
Reinfections are rampant for those aged 5 - 64
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
🚨They hoped Covid vaccine would stay in the muscle of the arm but in some cases it does not
Spike protein in vax is cytotoxic & causes damage when it circulates in the bloodstream
⬇️ Study shows those w/ post vax myocarditis had significant levels of spike in blood plasma 😵💫
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
🤔 Who benefits from encouraging people to expose themselves to a cytotoxic virus causing widespread, multi-system organ damage that worsens with each infection?
❌ NOT the people
✅ Businesses
✅ Employers
✅ Pharma & Medical companies
✅ Government
How?
Read on…
1/
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
⚠️More is not always better w/ vaccines especially when a pathogen is rapidly & continuously mutating
Study: Those given 3 doses had poorer immune response to new variants than those w/ only 2 doses
Boosting appears to hamper response to new variants
nature.com/articles/s41422-0…
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
This is the FDA's way of telling you that the tests aren't working for the new Sars3/XBBs strains: something we've been saying for ages now: antivirals to be given without positive tests because the tests arent working basically: has been going on for ages.
💥Lisa Johnston, PhD💥 retweeted
What is 80% “relative efficacy”?
Treatment Control
18% 90%
10% 50%
2% 10%
0.01% 0.05%
Actual difference
-72%
-40%
-8%
-0.04%
ALL 80% efficacy🤔
NO ONE expects 80% to be 0.04% which is the “benefit” for bivalent booster⬇️
