Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse) profile picture

Official Profile - Literally Anybody Else for President 2024 and VP Candidate Neal David Sutz. Let's give Americans an Alternative on November 5th #makeyourmark

Texas
Joined November 2023
Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)Photo by Literally Anybody Else (@LitAnybodyElse)
Let's break this down question by question. Your supporters were betting that you were going to reveal the pedophiles in government. It isn't selfish to not want to be ruled by pedophiles. Why didn't they release?, possibly because it incriminates them too. <continued in replies>
1
119
No amount of “success” makes it okay to cover for pedophiles. We aren't stupid. We won’t trade justice for a booming economy. Justifying silence on Epstein is exactly why your base is walking. You’re not losing support because of the Left it's because you’ve betrayed what’s right
2
2
100
Replying to @elonmusk
@elonmusk If you are looking for a party, I could use some help with the horizon party. It's for the 80% like you said.
15
Replying to @_Tomsellleck
@_Tomsellleck Not sure if this is the real Tom Selleck but someone in Texas voted for him as president.
14
Replying to @JoshShapiroPA
@JoshShapiroPA Someone in Texas wanted you to be President. First I've seen so far where they took the time to physically write someone's name.
11
Replying to @TheRock
@TheRock Someone in Texas wanted you to be President.
9
Regardless of who you vote for, don't do this.
1
116
Here's the same from the other side.
75
First draft of logo for potential political party Horizon. What do y'all think? All opinions wanted.
1
3
174
In light of recent events and the current political climate under President Trump's administration, we're considering forming a new political movement that embodies our collective aspirations and values. We've identified three potential names, each symbolizing distinct principles. I'll give more detail on each name in this thread:​ The Atlas Party: Emphasizing shared responsibility and resilience, representing those prepared to shoulder the challenges of rebuilding and strengthening our nation together.​ The Prism Party: Celebrating diversity and transparency, highlighting the importance of multiple perspectives coming together to form a unified, clear vision for the future.​ The Horizon Party: Focusing on forward-thinking and optimism, dedicated to long-term solutions and guiding the country toward a brighter tomorrow.​ We value your input in shaping this movement. Which of these names resonates most with you? Please share your thoughts in the comments and let us know why you feel a particular name aligns with our collective goals. Your feedback is crucial as we strive to create a movement that truly represents the will and spirit of the people.
5
4
204
🌍 The Atlas Party Core Metaphor: Carrying the weight of the world, willingly. Core Themes: Responsibility without tyranny, Strength with compassion, Global awareness, and Decentralized power The people shoulder the burden, not just pass it off. Not domination, but endurance for the good of all. A nation that leads by example, not force. Like Atlas, the support is beneath the system, not above it. Policy Direction: Government accountability audits (“Hold it all up, or let it collapse.”) Decentralized community funding models Citizen responsibility initiatives (e.g. civic service in lieu of military) Foreign policy rooted in burden sharing not dominance Potential Slogans: “We carry it together.” “The strength to bear, the will to build.”
69
I want to take this moment to remind everyone not to make guarantees. We got who we got because we didn't take political realities seriously and thus, we weren't taken seriously when given options. The Democratic party is going to have to learn how to stop dismissing and gaslighting concerns from the other side if they hope to not implode. That said, I do think it's time for a brand new party to step up. Ideally, I'd like to do away with parties altogether.
2
1
10
893
My reacton to the benediction: I am not one to judge but, based on @MaryLTrump 's book, Frank Trump wouldn't be looking at this situation from heaven. Can someone dump some mashed potatoes on Don's head now?
1
1
148
Lol, awkward silence immediately after his address is a bit of forshadowing maybe. Somebody is getting fired today.
1
126
"I'm here because the American people have spoken." No...Absolutely not...You are there because the people in power didn't give the American people any other choices you wet sock.
2
97
I wonder if Trump will be classy or if he will spend his time making his inaugural address putting down everyone he can think of.
2
117
One of the greatest concerns about AI isn’t just the fear of it surpassing human intelligence and becoming autonomous. It’s the possibility that AI could learn enough about us to improve us. Imagine AI decoding what makes geniuses like Einstein extraordinary or what gives certain individuals unique physical abilities. What if wealthy individuals could pay to embed these traits into their children? For example, AI could identify the gene mutations for enhanced muscle growth (like myostatin inhibitors) or engineer people to see infrared light by modifying eye structures. Over time, this could lead to the creation of a small, engineered population of “superhumans.” In just a few generations, their average abilities could surpass the best of the rest of humanity. This wouldn’t just be the plot of Gattaca—it would be a real-world scenario, only more extreme and dangerous. The issue isn’t just the advancements themselves but how humanity reacts. History has shown we’re quick to divide into “us vs. them” groups, especially when inequality grows. Such engineered superhumans could trigger a survival crisis, a war between natural humans and those designed to be superior—not by chance, but by AI-driven precision. And here’s the real kicker: if AI could design people smarter than itself, humanity might not stand a chance in this divide. What do you think? Are we ready to handle this kind of future? Should we be worried?
1
2
130