The left radical remains mired in the puerile, wishful Law of the Heart; The bourgeois remains repressed, in bad conscience; Only the fascist is a whole man.

I didn’t want to share a society with the lower races

Oh. Buddhism made the Japanese short.

This is how I’m provisionally defining fascism : x is fascism = there exists a set x such that for all t, t is a member of x implies t is a proposition, and there exist p. q, r ,s such that the conjunction of p, q, r and s is a subset of x, and p = racial differences exist, and are substantial, significantly heritable, and strongly socially impactful, q = the ethnic nation is an essential human institution, r = patriarchy is an essential human institution, s = liberal and representative institutions are too weak to defend ethnic nations from subversion, and, for all t, t is a proposition implies that if the disjunction of p, q, r, and s does not imply t, then t is not a member of x Df. Maybe i can do better with s, but i can define p, q and r pretty well, so as to make them pretty unequivocally true. I would argue that philosophical eugenics would belong to x, but x would not imply any particular eugenic policy. I would argue that only laws equivalent to the Nuremberg laws could actualise x. The ontological falsehood of liberalism, and therefore anything to the left of liberalism, is implied, including conservatism as the right wing of liberalism. I guess I need to add some corporatist axiom to make the socio-economic dimension explicit.

I have remained consistent throughout in my Russophilia, as well as my northern hemisphere, high-race neo-colonialism : the only way to substitute a rational world-system for the present indiscriminate chaos.

Sometimes I think the modern state is becoming so effective at psycho-engineering that I might be one of the last of my kind. Of course they want and actively strive to prevent the development of people like me, in other words, to maximally minimize freedom. The best strategy for that is pursuing precisely the methods of psycho-engineering they put into effect in their schools and through the institutions of their psychology industry. If the conditioning is early and effective, it’s not experienced as ego-dystonic by the subject. They strip people of the capacity for freedom and make them identify with their servitude. Hopefully it’s unrealizable. It feels unrealizable on Twitter, which is why society is so dully disappointing by contrast, since there, it seems almost fully realized. It’s unsurprising that the state is very uncomfortable with the existence of Twitter.