Ernest 🐬 retweeted
Elon did Megafon on X and I’m pretty sure he did it with the help of people at CPAC or Heritage or Natcon or similar close to Orban. He enacted Orban’s contrived social media effort on here at the same time, and with similar electoral results in 2026
Heidegger on art, saying that what distinguishes works of art from other created objects is that their createdness is of, and central to, the created work. Whereas in other objects this is merely incidental
So the fact that say, a hammer was created, is only important to the wielder of the hammer insofar as it being a precondition to it existing. But in an artwork, this is an immovable reality through which all artness of the object is understood through.
I think is what means
Ernest 🐬 retweeted
Hans Schliemann, excavator of Troy, gave his wife a lengthy examination on Greek history and mythology before marrying her. “She should be poor but well educated; she must be enthusiastic about Homer and about the rebirth of my beloved Greece… and if possible, beautiful.”
Lmao
Ernest 🐬 retweeted
Replying to @PaleoMarxism @LustralBasin
The recent post-midterm defeat bloodletting is over a clique of the online right self-appointing themselves as gatekeepers of the online right that serve the same function as the left’s nervous system by browbeating and ostracizing dissent. But it never could have worked.
is any "community" on x so neurotic as rightists? I never see anyone else constantly trying to assess, diagnose, and pilot the direction and output of their "group" as rwers
maybe its the same with leftists and I just never see it, but it seems like most of them are barely conscious of being a collective outside of random statements like "all hot people are libtards" or whatever. Whereas with the right its always like this nauseating townhall vibe
My professor said there are certain things we can all agree on such as to treat other human beings with respect regardless of their race or gender then singled me out and said except Ernest, probably.
Ernest 🐬 retweeted
Leadership.txt
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.














