S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick) header
S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick) profile picture

[email protected], editor/publisher of “garrison: The Journal of History and Deep Politics,” @garrisonjournal. Anti-Partisan.

Auburn, IN
Joined March 2017
Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)Photo by S.T. Patrick (@MWN_STPatrick)
From Covid to Ilhan Omar’s “marriage,” first investigated in 2016 by Obama officials, it’s a bad time for MSNBCDems to be charging that things are “right-wing conspiracy theories.” They need a drink.
1
34
Throw in Russiagate, the Steele Dossier, “he’s going to jail” claims, Seth Rich, etc, and you really have to be unhinged to make the airheaded plastic people at FoxNews look more correct. That takes a lot, and yet MSNBCDems keep accomplishing that.
10
S.T. Patrick retweeted
False accuser Kristin Knouse’s sexual proclivities got exposed during her deposition. The crazy thing is that her graphic text messages would’ve never seen the light of day if she didn’t choose to go on a cluster b rampage to ruin this successful, reputable man’s life who dumped her after consensually f*cking him for x amount of months. Her crime isn’t the sex part, or the sex acts, it’s *everything* she did afterward. The scale of deception, lies, reputation damage, the texts that exposed her glee when plotting against him, her vindictiveness - she framed this man from the inside out. That’s her crime, and like many other women who abuse(d) the MeToo movement and its lingering aftermath, she should serve prison time for it.
🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 “I can’t wait to wake up tomorrow and feel like I’ve been gang-raped!” MeToo hoaxer Kristin Knouse is confronted with her own crude texts to David Sabatini. She withheld these texts initially until the defamation lawsuit against her exposed them. (Follow me for more exclusives from this case.)
19
68
5
773
38,136
Is this another “right-wing conspiracy theory” later proven correct? It was the Obama admin who investigated it in 2016, acc to the NY Times (paywalled).
37
All that surveillance and he and the Virginia teacher can’t be found. Look, if they can’t find them, it’s not my job. Rewards target the least common denominator, like lotteries. wsmv.com/2026/10/28/reward-i…
3
303
S.T. Patrick retweeted
Woodward’s been outing sources by word or deed for years. He exposed Fred Buzhardt in a 1984 column in the Post. He did the same to Colin Powell after he died. He donated notes of a secret 1974 interview with Al Haig to UT library after Haig died.
Bob Woodward’s unmasking of deceased sources has sparked an ethical debate, with some veteran journalists concerned it could erode reporter-source trust “Does your confidentiality disappear with your last breath? I don’t know,” @Sulliview told Status status.news/p/bob-woodward-n…
2
3
178
S.T. Patrick retweeted
Did you notice whose name isn't in this article? Alexander Haig. Woodward's notes at the University of Texas show he and Bernstein visited Haig at his home around midnight after the Nixon pardon and Haig unloaded details that appeared in The Final Days.
5
6
18
3,126
I haven’t seen the Elizabeth Holmes “You Can See Everything” doc yet (no spoilers please), but one of the tragedies of it already is that it has guaranteed her a lifetime career in reality TV of some kind. Our relationship with celebrity is just weird.
61
And b/c RS is already annoying me today, can we at least get someone with even a modicum of sense to do these lists? Sure, lists are supposed to provoke argument. No one’s view is definitive with opinion-art. But my gosh RS lists have always been so bad. rollingstone.com/music/music…
1
4
214
I cannot remember how long it’s been since writing at Rolling Stone mattered, if it ever did, and I cannot imagine it returns with this, not in today’s climate. We can already guess the angle on every story, so why do it? rollingstone.com/politics/po…
1
62
No judgment, as I need to look into it more, but I did not know this:
1
28
Do I think Trump is a political fraud, a political criminal, and an all-around deceitful politician! Of course! The problem is that you can’t convince me that Democrats aren’t, as well. “Vote Blue” isn’t workable for me. It’s a continuation under another color. It’s systemic.
2
2
4
171
S.T. Patrick retweeted
Former MIT scientist wins $6M defamation verdict against colleague who accused him of sexual misconduct trib.al/q1cVlXE
292
1,077
158
10,841
1,644,367
S.T. Patrick retweeted
Can we PLEASE normalize just hanging out at each other’s houses again? Why does every friendship meetup need to be a whole production, a restaurant reservation, and a $150 bill? I just want to sit on your couch, drink something, and talk for hours.
707
10,117
1,547
78,565
2,243,514
Not sure there is a way to empirically prove this either way, but I wonder if people have become more crazy after the Internet age and so noticeably with life lived so publicly, or if they’ve always been crazy and hid it well when life was more private. The times vs the person?
64
As Im older, I don’t disrespect Mormon missionaries, but the thing I can’t grasp is that they’re almost all between 19-22 years old. I can’t take spiritual guidance from someone 19-22 who has often led a pretty struggle-free life. And when they’re often parroting apologetics….?
2
1
4
165
No matter the issue, someone will respond, “Well, you know it’s just all about the money,” and they’ll be correct on some level. It’s not great analysis, as it’s something I think we can now all assume, but it’s also not ALL ABOUT. Majority? Maybe, but there is more nuance.
42
S.T. Patrick retweeted
I'm very excited to be hosting a new radio show, Monday-Thursday, from 4-5 pm eastern, starting Monday, October 19. You can listen live online at 1360khnc.com and the shows will be archived on the web site. Feel free to join me on the air, as I'll be taking listener calls.
10
19
3
55
1,149
Problems occur because they are complex. Too many people think giving people houses solves homelessness or giving people food solves starvation. There are also deeper problems/struggles/issues within - some society’s fault, some the individual’s. “Solving” seems unrealistic.
1
58