Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi) header
Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi) profile picture

Investigative journalist, PhD, Researcher, TV presenter/producer, ex-@ABCTV. @Brownstoneinst Fellow. Subscribe to my Substack 👇🏼

Sydney
Joined March 2011
Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)Photo by Maryanne Demasi, PhD (@MaryanneDemasi)
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Replying to @anish_koka
- @TracyBethHoeg discussed this scandal during her talk at Rutgers on October 13
1
16
1
46
1,574
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Perhaps it’s time to abandon the mRNA platform for Covid vaccines altogether? Sweden has already chosen a different path, selecting a protein-based Covid vaccine rather than Pfizer’s or Moderna’s mRNA products for next year' national Covid vaccination campaign. blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/is…
4
11
1
42
1,327
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
🚩Is it the lipid nanoparticles? New research reveals striking differences in how Pfizer's and Moderna's lipid ingredients behave in the bloodstream, raising questions about whether they contribute to vaccine injuries. LINK 👇👇 @RetsefL @Kevin_McKernan @MaryBowdenMD
18
65
6
153
8,334
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
A bad sign for the future of the public health field. Ardern is a professional politician with no training or experience in medicine, nursing, or public health. She was one of most ruthless and remorseless covid tyrants. Hard to understand such a poor choice.
Why does someone with plenty of money and a choice of how she spends her time choose to move into a public health position now?
78
194
7
871
11,025
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
It’s laughable that Jacinda Ardern the tyrannical leader who enforced medical apartheid is now to teach empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust. Having fled New Zealand where she is despised she has spent the last years trying to reinvent herself as a woman of kindness and compassion. It’s never gonna happen. The internet is forever and we have the receipts.
217
627
48
2,472
32,356
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni @mscott Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice Dear Professor Scott, I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust. You cannot be serious. You are quoted as saying: "Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other." Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic. My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government. While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage. At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live. People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later. Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure. Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking. I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable. And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was. Kind? For whom? Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods. And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support. The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified. The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings. While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive. Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand. We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on. Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them. And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion? It is sickening. Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment? Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them? Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand? I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause. Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences. I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do... But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price. We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up. Some of those people will never recover what they lost. And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy. What an absolute disgrace. Yours sincerely, Alia Bland Co-founder, Voices for Freedom New Zealand
1,171
3,432
415
12,029
378,627
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
A Full-time job requires a full-time pay for quality research and analysis. In @MaryanneDemasi case she outputs higher quality than an entire bureau so the cost benefit justification is a no brainer.
1
6
16
962
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Unverified and unverifiable health data will continue to distort reality in medicine until the problem is taken seriously. #EMRgate
🚨The Real-World Data Dilemma — Part 2: Medicine’s new black box This is one of the biggest challenges facing medicine today. Medical decisions are increasingly shaped by massive datasets extracted from patient records. But who verifies how those data are processed before researchers ever see them? And can independent researchers access them to check the findings? LINK 👇👇 @SecKennedy @DrJBhattacharya @newstart_2024 @Kevin_McKernan
12
25
1,153
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Never forget the Surgisphere scandal.
🚨The Real-World Data Dilemma — Part 1: Has medicine forgotten the Surgisphere scandal?🚨 A fake medical database changed global health policy in 2020. Six years later, the flaw it exposed in big-data healthcare has only grown bigger. LINK 👇👇 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @AaronSiriSG
10
18
1,202
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
🛑 Moderna’s melanoma ‘breakthrough’ gets a reality check Some of the Phase III data Moderna & Merck withheld in August have now leaked—and despite the spin from market analysts, the numbers tell a more sober story than the original headlines suggested. LINK below 👇👇
5
79
7
201
23,299
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Unfortunate violent and lame defamation and weaponizing of tragedies instead of addressing the facts. I think I rest my case…
34
37
2
190
13,638
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Moderna’s melanoma ‘breakthrough’ gets a reality check Some of the Phase III data Moderna & Merck withheld in August have now leaked—and despite the spin from market analysts, the numbers tell a more sober story than the original headlines suggested. MD reports analyses the data so far: blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/mo……
9
1
19
1,341
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Manufacturing a Hepatitis B Scare | @MaryanneDemasi | ow.ly/eypj5100jkN Harvard researchers predict an 83% surge in childhood hepatitis B infections. But their alarming forecast rests on unverified assumptions that the New York Times failed to scrutinise. #HepatitisB #NYT #PublicHealth #FearPorn
4
8
15
791
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
The headlines have already done the work on this. Does reality even matter any more?
🛑 Moderna’s melanoma ‘breakthrough’ gets a reality check Some of the Phase III data Moderna & Merck withheld in August have now leaked—and despite the spin from market analysts, the numbers tell a more sober story than the original headlines suggested. LINK below 👇👇
9
15
68
5,048
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
The Harvard study does not demonstrate that shared decision-making will cause an 83% surge in childhood hepatitis B infections. It shows how easily questionable assumptions can produce frightening predictions — and how quickly those predictions become political headlines. blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/ma… @RobertKennedyJr
2
12
40
1,504
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
🛑 Manufacturing a Hepatitis B Scare Harvard researchers predict an 83% surge in childhood hepatitis B infections. The @nytimes amplified it without scrutinising the model’s assumptions. Relative risk increase = 83% over 20 yrs Absolute risk increase = 0.006% over 20 yrs LINK below 👇👇 @SecKennedy @KMilhoanMDPhD @RetsefL @FLSurgeonGen @SenRonJohnson
11
44
4
83
25,792
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
There is a Deep State, and it is obstructing the accountability and truth the American people voted for
25
124
7
395
34,774
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
Another skillful deconstruction of another fake news health story by @MaryanneDemasi - @apoorva_nyc and @nytimes editors should read it and learn something. “The New York Times also overlooked an obvious real-world comparison. Britain begins routine hepatitis B vaccination at eight weeks, while Denmark reserves it for higher-risk groups, and both have maintained low levels of childhood hepatitis B infection. Also, in Canada, Ontario routinely vaccinates children against hepatitis B at around age 12 rather than at birth, with no documented surge in childhood infections. These are precisely the kinds of questions and comparisons that should be examined before alarming projections are presented to the public. Mathematical models can be useful, but their predictions are only as credible as the assumptions behind them.”
🛑 Manufacturing a Hepatitis B Scare Harvard researchers predict an 83% surge in childhood hepatitis B infections. The @nytimes amplified it without scrutinising the model’s assumptions. Relative risk increase = 83% over 20 yrs Absolute risk increase = 0.006% over 20 yrs LINK below 👇👇 @SecKennedy @KMilhoanMDPhD @RetsefL @FLSurgeonGen @SenRonJohnson
2
6
20
1,206
Maryanne Demasi, PhD retweeted
If a newborn baby gets a Hep B vaccine and (decades later) is deemed a “non-responder”, then a “booster” vaccine or “full series” is recommended. Does the Harvard study model account for “non-responders” (i.e. “vaccine ineffectiveness”)? Per: hepb.org/assets/Uploads/HBV-…
🛑 Manufacturing a Hepatitis B Scare Harvard researchers predict an 83% surge in childhood hepatitis B infections. The @nytimes amplified it without scrutinising the model’s assumptions. Relative risk increase = 83% over 20 yrs Absolute risk increase = 0.006% over 20 yrs LINK below 👇👇 @SecKennedy @KMilhoanMDPhD @RetsefL @FLSurgeonGen @SenRonJohnson
1
8
11
1,124