@Masksopher

What a wild time to be alive.

Joined February 2026
In my view, they put Trump in power for many reasons, but one in particular: American hegemony is reaching its final stage. Before the end, the one who can move the military is chosen to fight those battles. Kings did not choose heirs simply by birthright, They chose the ONE the army would die following. Legitimacy was never about blood. Americans are tired of endless wars, tired of body bags returning, and most importantly, tired of deaths carried out in their name and being hated for it. That hits many people harder than the deaths themselves. The elites understand that Kamala Harris does not have the characteristics to move the army, Moving and Ordering are not the same, The title orders, the king moves. Trump, on the other hand, revived that spirit by acknowledging the wars in Iraq and all the others as mistakes, Acknowledgment of mistakes is a powerful weapon but he never mentioned why they died. Trump used the term “politically correct,” which they have never really been, but in my view, He means No more politically restrained. Empires are not maintained by hesitation, they are maintained by breaking moral thinking and moral conduct. But one thing he has done for sure is change the way politics is played.
4
1
2
1,265
Joseph Stalin owned multiple houses while many others didn’t even have a place to call home.
328
Build your own phone and add your own shit. Otherwise, you can't demand how Apple does business, If it makes you cope better, Chinese maps still kept them, Hope this piece of info helped.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
438
Yeah, typical, block people, just like Iranian authorities block their own citizens from information. Can’t handle opposing views, Get the fuck out here...
1
240
Get some sleep, dude you’re crushing too hard.
Come closer. Iran will sink your ships.
170
You can’t call something a shining star of humanity, when it’s tied to violence, conflict, and suffering.
Open your eyes. Hezbollah is the shining star of humanity.
1
114
Joseph Stalin had multiple homes. He outsourced communism to the people, but he owned multiple houses, dude was savage.
Capitalism fundamentally failed in 1929. Ever since then, the capitalists that got rich off of it have been using the government to stay in power. Note that Chevron interests, at the center of the Iran conflict, is just a rebrand of Rockefeller's old Standard Oil.
118
China is so communist that they have Louis Vuitton stores in their country for the poor to buy, hahaahhahaha.
🇨🇳 If Communism doesn't work, then why is China the most advanced country on Earth?
1
97
You guys enjoy keeping your audience ignorant Both DeepSeek and OpenAI are free for users, but the free versions are limited, You can only send a certain number of messages or use the strongest models a limited amount. The real business is not the chat itself. Both companies charge for API access, That means developers and companies pay to use the AI inside their own apps, websites, and products, So the chat is free for people, but businesses pay to use the technology at scale. I’ve been saying this, China is very good at deceiving people who don’t do their own research. Why do you guys keep doing this?
This is why US AI corporations are so angry about, and threatened by, China's open-source models. Deceptively named "OpenAI" and other Silicon Valley corporations planned to charge exorbitant rents for people to use their privatized AI utility, but China broke their monopoly.
260
At least we can criticize the failures of the United States. How are we supposed to criticize the wins or failures of China? You’ve been saying for 50 years that Taiwan is yours, and here we are in 2026 still waiting. Don’t be surprised when Japan pulls the nuclear card on you and claims it is a nuclear state.
The US navy says they cannot escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. But in a Taiwan scenario, people think the US navy can escort huge convoys of ships, to offload weapons, materiel, food and energy onto an island 150km off the coast of China. This Iran war is a total humiliation for the US. It exposes the limitations of the US hard power, barely enough to deal with Iran.
1
229
At this rate, they’ll end up hitting China. Hahahahahhaha.
So far, Iran has attacked 14 cargo ships in the Strait of Hormuz. A Japanese ship was attacked today. More reasons for a regime change.
83
Masksopher retweeted
So far, Iran has attacked 14 cargo ships in the Strait of Hormuz. A Japanese ship was attacked today. More reasons for a regime change.
Three more vessels hit by projectiles in Strait of Hormuz, showing merchant ships remain in firing line reut.rs/4roMW72 reut.rs/4roMW72
2
2
3
3,068
A reason to hit back harder If Washington expected Iran to strike bases, that gives the U.S. a cleaner public case to say, “See, Iran escalated, now we answer harder.” Reuters reported U.S. officials have framed the war around stopping Iranian threats to U.S. forces and allies, and Hegseth said Iran’s regional retaliation was strengthening U.S. alliances. Let Iran show its cards When Iran launches missiles or drones, it reveals launch methods, locations, stockpiles, and patterns. That can help the U.S. track and destroy more of Iran’s missile network afterward. The White House has said the U.S. military is working to dismantle Iran’s missile infrastructure, and Reuters has reported repeated U.S. strikes on Iranian military assets during the retaliation cycle. Pull Gulf partners closer to Washington If Iran hits bases in Gulf countries, those governments may feel they need the U.S. even more for air defense, naval protection, and intelligence, Reuters directly reported Hegseth saying Iran’s regional retaliation was strengthening U.S. alliances. Make Iran look like the side widening the war Even if the U.S. expected retaliation, once Iran hits bases or ships, Washington can use that to win more diplomatic backing and make neutral countries more nervous about Iran, Reuters has reported Iranian attacks on ships, bases, and regional economic targets, which makes that argument easier for the U.S. to sell. Domestic politics A president can sometimes get short term political cover by looking tough and saying American forces were attacked and had to respond, Reuters noted the war could affect U.S. midterm politics and that the administration has tried to reassure voters while defending the campaign. But the other side is just as real: This is not a free reward. Even if the U.S. expected Iran to hit those bases, that still brings wounded troops, shipping disruption, higher oil prices, political risk, and a chance the war grows beyond what Washington wanted, Reuters has reported wounded U.S. troops, halted tanker traffic, and rising economic risk from the conflict. America knew Iran would hit those bases, the reward would be strategic and political, more justification, more intelligence, more allied dependence, and more room to escalate. But that does not mean the hits were “good” for America. It means Washington may have believed the benefit of letting Iran retaliate in a limited way was worth the cost.
58
The United States is still winning the tech world overall. It leads in the highest-value layers: top AI models, hyperscale cloud, major software platforms, and much of the capital behind the industry. Stanford’s 2025 AI Index says U.S.-based institutions produced 40 notable AI models in 2024 versus China’s 15, and Synergy data shows the global cloud market is dominated by Amazon, Microsoft, and Google , all American companies. But it is not a clean monopoly. Taiwan is winning semiconductor manufacturing, especially at the advanced end, because TSMC remains the critical foundry for many of the world’s leading chips. Reuters also reported in February 2026 that Taiwan’s government said shifting 40% of its chip capacity to the U.S. would be “impossible,” which underlines how central Taiwan still is to global semiconductor production. China is the main challenger, especially in scale, industrial policy, publications, and patents. Stanford says China continues to lead in AI publications and patents, even while the U.S. remains ahead in frontier models. Chatham House also says the U.S. and China are the two leading powers in AI by a significant margin, with the U.S. ahead in compute.
55
It’s a fucking mess, I agree. But now is not the time to bitch about it, it’s time to get the job done. The regime must go. They hate us more than ever, and at this point it’s about survival. Once they get their hands on those nukes, they’re not just nuking the fucking “Zionists”, they’ll be nuking all of us. It’s too late to sit around bitching. Now is the time to show support and make sure they’re gone, they show us they don't care about dying, They are out in the open on the streets.
51
You guys on the left and all the communist wannabes can’t see reality and when reality hits you, it hurts. Thank God I stopped trying to force myself into that communist mindset. China is out here fighting for its own interests, which I respect and actually love about China. But they’re not communist or Liberal view, They have zero reason to fight your fights. And NO, America is not going to attack China, not now and not in the future, China built what it needed, China will get its loans and Oils, No matter who is planted in Iran, Be a U.S. puppet or successors of the Regime, business will follow its course as usual. Iran had plenty of time, but the regime was too focused on oppressing its own people instead of working with their people, and eventually the bigger devil came to devour them. China is a capitalist state + authoritarian + social programs. You want to live in some delusional world where “ohhh they’re communist like Marx said” or the new trend: “they’re socialist.” No, it’s all power. In China: you work, you get paid. They fight for profit just like everywhere else. America is capitalism with a fake democracy preselected candidates.*
China and Russia are under no obligation to militarily intervene on any other people's behalf. Geopolitics is not a superhero movie, where morality is fulfilled by whimsical force. Neither Stalin nor Mao militarily intervened in most anti-imperialist conflicts either, so this is not a result of corruption. HOWEVER, what many people do not realize is that neither Russia or China have any official paradigm, or working doctrine of international relations beyond international law, and the postwar world order. This means that officially, they regard the long chain of US aggression as merely a series of unrelated, illegal violations of international law, the UN charter, etc.- and each time, they wag their finger, and condemn the 'misbehavior' of the US. China does not officially acknowledge the unipolar word order: It it holds that we live in a world of international law, and that the US is merely destabilizing the 'international order' via 'hegemonism' and 'unilateralism.' Russia's foreign relations paradigm is even more legalistic and conformist. From a purely analytical point of view, the naive conservatism of this international relations paradigm is suicidal. It is what has empowered liberal forces within Russia, China and Iran to sabatoge Eurasian integration, based on the theory that they are simply separate states under one international order that recognizes the national right of self-determination. Imagine a group of pedestrians on the subway. This particular group keeps getting targeted by one maniac. Over and over again. Yet they pretend it's just a coincidence - failing to recognize the characteristics they have in common that make them targets. For the sake of self-preservation, the rational thing to do is stop treating each other as random pedestrians, and acknowledge the need to do something decisive about the maniac. Contrary to what my retarded critics claim, I am not a "third worldist." Nor am I making demands of any nation. I am analytically pointing out that without Eurasian integration, the maniac is going to pick everyone off one by one. A new paradigm of international relations is necessary that recognizes US hegemony as both a de-facto reality and an existential threat to the national security of all states which refuse to surrender to it. I don't blame Russia or China for not intervening on behalf of Iran. There is no paradigm that even exists which has officialized the common interests and geopolitical position of these nations. For now this acknowledgement is purely theoretical, usually by Iranian, Russian and Chinese intellectuals who constantly have to clash with globalist liberals within their own countries. Social media hype has led people to believe there's some secret Eurasian NATO. THERE ISN'T. Yes, the official statements these countries put out - as naive as they sound - really does reflect the extent of their geopolitical orientation. There's no occult coordination going on. I am analytically making the observation that this will eventually imperil all of them, if the current trend continues. No, it's not third worldism. And no, I'm not claiming they should sacrifice their national interests for small countries bullied by America. I am making a sober and realistic assessment of the world system, international relations, and the nature of the conflict between the US and its 'foreign adversaries.'
223
You GUYS really think America is running low on weapons. Come on. The U.S. has been fighting nonstop since World War II, you don’t stay in the game that long by running out of ammo. let’s clear this up: The Pentagon has its own rare earth supply. They don’t need China for missiles, jets, radars, or any military system. China is only used for commercial stuff, phones, batteries, electronics, because it’s cheap labor and China focuses on mass manufacturing. That’s it. You Guys forget the American government can be arrogant, sure, sometimes they make dumb decisions and we all sit there wondering what the hell they’re doing. But they’re not that stupid. Not the kind of stupid where they’d depend on a rival for the one thing their entire power is built on: weapons. Half the info online is CIA style mixing anyway, a bit of truth blended with noise. They drop it, opposition accounts amplify it, and suddenly everyone thinks they’re exposing some deep secret. Reality: they’re reposting exactly what the system wanted boosted. Nobody outside knows what’s happening inside the Pentagon. You only see what they allow you to see. Every “statement” they release is already filtered and framed. So no America isn’t running low on weapons or ammunition, and the Pentagon isn’t dependent on China. The real stockpiles never show up on social media.
When Trump says his military stockpiles are sufficient for war, even though the war has only been going on for three days, it means there is indeed a shortage. Trump's bluster and erratic pronouncements always convey the opposite.
83
War makes heroes of the dead and punchlines of the men who started it.
60
Maps change, but the dead stay exactly where they fell.
50
China is so communist that their businesses compete for profit margins so hard they end up destroying themselves against each other. They’re so communist that Chinese businesses won’t let go of a single cent, they would rather not sell a product if even one cent is missing. They’re so communist that, in every country they operate in, they pay under the minimum wage, hiring illegals or vulnerable workers just to avoid paying what they’re supposed to all because they’re obsessed with profit. Waooo communism looks excellent, right? You communist wannabes are so delusional and hilarious, but hey, your followers keep buying into that crap.
“Democracy is the magnificent system where we’re all allowed to vote for which millionaire gets to ignore us for the next four years.” China. How Communism Has Delivered.
1
105
So now communists are taking food away from the working class? Got it.
🚨🇨🇳 BREAKING: Autonomous delivery vehicles are becoming more common in China.
67