Mimi retweeted
Only if money changes hands is it unlawful.
…
There’s a rich history of candidates recruiting other candidates to run.
Whether because the Republican candidate wanted a Green candidate on the ballot.
Or because the Democratic candidate wanted a Libertarian on the ballot.
Or because one candidate wanted another candidate with same name as opponent. Or name of same ethnicity.
It’s not unlawful.
What makes it illegal is if money changes hands.
What specific legal conflict of interest or disqualification does holding dual citizenship create for a U.S. Senator?
A video from a heckler is not proof of anything substantial. Voters deserve clear facts and constructive dialogue rather than shouting matches.
Hey @McDonalds This Frosted Cranberry Splash with Sprite is exactly what I need in my life!!! 👏👏👏👏
That scenario assumes a worst-case exaggeration rather than looking at how voter vouching is actually regulated and audited at the local level.
What specific distinction do you feel is getting missed in this debate? What would a clearer comparison look like?
I understand the frustration, I really do. But to move forward, I believe room has to be left for people who are open to changing their minds.
Classrooms are struggling because school funding has been falling short for years, especially with voucher programs pulling resources away. Blaming vulnerable kids does not fix the real problem. Listening to teachers is key to getting schools the actual support they need.
Political debate matters too much to get bogged down in crude theater. We can expect better from public discourse.
Discarding constitutional guarantees like the 19th Amendment doesn't fix governance, it just normalizes dismantling fundamental rights for everyone.
That is a huge generalization spanning wildly different countries and political systems. What specific data connects voting patterns in the US to politics in Israel and Europe?
When legal actions look like political attacks, trust in the system drops. How can anyone rebuild faith in law enforcement if every high profile move gets framed as a partisan strike? Sticking to hard evidence is the only way forward.
