Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
לדראון עולם. יהודים, שעברו רצח עם לפני 80 שנה, עושים רצח עם בעזה. בושה, זעם ויגון: haaretz.co.il/news/politics/…
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Michael Benyair, former Attorney General of Israel:
"To eternal shame. Jews, who suffered a genocide 80 years ago, are committing genocide in Gaza. Shame, rage, and sorrow."
לדראון עולם. יהודים, שעברו רצח עם לפני 80 שנה, עושים רצח עם בעזה. בושה, זעם ויגון: haaretz.co.il/news/politics/…
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Atheism left an empty space
Secular religion took its place
But left the people in despair
Childless hedonism sans care
Maybe religion’s not so bad
To keep you from being sad
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Why the US cannot afford a recession:
At the end of the day, a government is no different than a business. It has costs (expenditures) and it has revenue (tax receipts). Because of the bleak fiscal position of the United States, a recession will act as a margin call on the debt and deficit. The US government is way out over its skis and over-leveraged, and a recession will act as a margin call.
Here’s how:
During a recession, expenditures go up and revenues go down- the last thing you want when you are already running a historic deficit (during peacetime and full employment)
Current situation
Currently, tax receipts (revenue) stands at $4.4T and spending is $7.7T
Of this $7.7T in spending, Social Security and Medicare are $3.2T, defense is $900B and interest is $1T, leaving us with $5.1T that cannot be cut
Expenditures
During the Dotcom bubble of 2000, expenditures increased by 13%
During 2008, expenditures increased by 9%
This leaves us an average increase of 11% and would take our total expenditures up to $8.6T
Revenue (tax receipts)
During the Dotcom bubble, revenue fell by 24%
During 2008, revenue fell by 32%
This leaves us an average decrease of 28% and would take our total revenue down to $3.2T
Deficit
Currently, we are running a $1.7T pro-cyclical deficit, (during “good times”)
Using the numbers outlined above, our deficit would blow out to $5.4T.
Each and every year.
That is a 215% increase in the deficit
GDP and the Deficit
Remember, the government cannot create anything on its own- it must leech off the economic activity of the businesses and citizens within that country. This “income”, as I always put it, is the GDP. GDP is what allows the government to service its debt and to operate
Our GDP is currently $27T and with a deficit of $1.7T, is 7% of GDP (again, during peacetime and full employment- this is unprecedented)
In the GFC, GDP fell by 4% and during COVID, by 10%
Split the difference at 7%, and our GDP will fall to $25T
The deficit of $5.4T, as a share of GDP, would be 21%
This is full-blown emerging market, money printing bonanza, imminent insolvency sort of a number
Return on debt
The return on each dollar of debt decreases as the debt to GDP increases. If you can get a $1.50 return on each $1 of debt, that’s actually a great deal.
However, in Q1 of 2024, our debt increased by $785B and we got $300B of return (GDP)
That’s a $0.35 return on every $1.00 of debt
Put another way, we now need to spend $2.60 to get a $1.00 return
And the worst part, is this return keeps getting lower (Q4 was $0.40 per $1.00 of debt) and the trend would only accelerate massively during a recession, meaning more and more debt/money needs to be issued to sustain a given amount of economic activity
Assuming this 0.35 return rate (it would likely be even lower), the government would need to issue/print $5.8T, just to keep the GDP propped up at what it was (0% GDP growth rate).
Because expenditures are (and have been for decades) growing significantly faster than receipts, we cannot sustain anything other than positive GDP growth. In fact, GDP must grow faster than expenditures, just to get back to break even (as outlined in my pinned post)
What it means
In the situation I outline above, bond yields will likely go up, not down. The bond market understands that a "normal" recession (given current fiscal picture as outlined above) requires the US to print insane sums of money, just to break even and stay stagnant. The numbers I outlined above are all public, and the math is simple.
If some nerd in his pajamas, like me, can figure this out, best believe the smartest traders in the world (bond traders) can see all of this, too.
It's not a "normal" recession. These are not "normal" numbers.
Because yields would go up, this means that the interest expense of $1T (which is already 25% of receipts) would increase, rapidly. This makes the situation exponentially worse as each dollar of debt will 'cost' that much more. And not only are these vicious cycles (negative feedback loops), but they are exponential.
This is the doom loop. This is the sovereign debt crisis of any emerging market over the past 100 years.
This is why they cannot a recession. It is an existential threat to their very existence, and best believe they will act that way. If you thought 40% M2 growth during COVID was a lot, this would make that look like child's play.
Not only is significant inflation needed to just service the debt, but even more inflation will be needed to delever
nitter.cf/infraa_/status/1791831…
The sovereign debt crisis is already here. The Fed and US government are completely trapped.
A little post on 'real rates' and how they will inflate the debt away:
Because of the fiscal picture, the US now requires negative real rates.
The real rate of return (in reference to treasuries) refers to the spread between the yield on a bond, and inflation
So, a 4.5% 10yr treasury returns a 1% real return when inflation is 3.5%
On the other side, if the 10yr treasury is yielding 4.5%, but inflation is 6.5%, the real rate is a negative -2%
The implication here, is that when real returns are positive, the government is losing money and debt load is getting worse
When real rates are negative, that means the government is making money off its debt and debt load is getting better
Example:
Say govt sells a 1yr bond for $100
The inflation rate is 10%
The yield on that 1yr bond is 1%
That means at the end of this period, the govt has paid out the initial principal ($100) + $1 of interest for a total of $101
However, because inflation ran at 10% over that year, it now requires $110 to equal the purchasing power of that initial $100
That bondholder got his principal back, and he also got his yield.
However, he lost money ($110-$101= $9 loss)
When real rates are positive, the bondholders are making a positive real return. That positive return is coming from us (mainly through an increase in the debt and deficit, since we run a twin deficit).
It's not like that real return is being paid for via taxes...
We, the taxpayers, are on the side of a losing trade. And the result of that losing trade, is an increase in the debt and deficit since we cannot afford to pay for that out of GDP or GDI
When debt to GDP is 125%+, nominal debt is $35T, interest expense alone is 25% of tax receipts, this is unsustainable and just plunges the US further into fiscal dominance
The longer this goes on, the worse the deleveraging will have to be
In this chart, we can see the real rate of return on the 10yr treasury, minus the Core CPI YoY.
Any positive real return is green, negative real rate is red
White line shows the govt debt to GDP
We see a very obvious inverse correlation
As debt/GDP goes higher, real returns fall (they must)
We also see that the decrease in debt/GDP from 2021-2023 corresponded, directly, to significantly negative real rates
Now, what bond holder is going to want to lose money on their trade? None of them.
No one wants to be a sucker.
[Remember, value of a bond is inverse to the yield - as the value of a bond goes down, the yield goes up and vice versa]
Bond holders will sell their bonds when they think inflation will outpace the yield. This means that yield goes up.
It's a self-correcting market. If the bond market sees inflation picking up and thinks that inflation will leave them with a negative real return in the future, they will sell the bonds that they believe have too low of a rate which drives the yields up.
We see the US 2yr yield (blue line) increasing in 2017-18 before inflation data showed an increase in inflation.
This works the other way, too. If the bond market thinks inflation will fall (economic slowdown), the bond market will buy bonds that it believes have a higher yield than the future economic growth.
We also see the 2yr yield (blue line) topping in Sept 2018 and falling, before the CPI data showed a fall in inflation
This is why the bond market is so important.
Now, what this means is that to get a significant real return for any meaningful period of time, the bond market cannot be allowed to function freely.
It needs to be controlled.
Yields need to be capped like Japan did with Yield Curve Control (YCC)
How do you do this?
Well, the central bank prints money and uses that money to buy bonds (sending yields lower)
They print as much money as needed to keep the yield at whatever level they are targeting
So far in 2024 (just 4 months), the US has sold $9.7 trillion of government debt.
Yes, some of this is rolling off old debt and not necessarily a net increase in debt.
But, in terms of YCC, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if we are rolling old debt, or issuing new debt-
In order to get the yields down, the Fed will have to print money to buy the bonds to bring the yields down
The sheer volume of money that will be needed to printed to buy this debt will be enormous. Obviously it won't be buying every single bond, but even if it's 50%, the numbers are staggering.
This is what is coming, because it has to
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Today @Uniswap Labs received a Wells notice from the SEC.
I’m not surprised. Just annoyed, disappointed, and ready to fight.
I am confident that the products we offer are legal and that our work is on the right side of history. But it’s been clear for a while that rather than working to create clear, informed rules, the SEC has decided to focus on attacking long-time good actors like Uniswap and Coinbase. All while letting bad actors like FTX slip by.
When I first set out to build Uniswap, the goal wasn’t to reimagine finance.
It was an experiment in radically decentralized, fully automated onchain markets. I didn’t know if it would work or if anyone would use it.
Fast forward to today, the Uniswap Protocol has processed over $2 trillion in volume. Many thousands of teams and developers have forked our code or built on top of it. We built entirely new financial infrastructure that is transparent, fair, secure, and accessible powering an entire industry.
The team at @Uniswap did all of this in the US from our office in New York City.
People often ask me why we stay in the US and my answer is simple: I believe that blockchain is incredibly powerful technology. Like the Internet, it’s here to stay. So someone needs to figure it out, and it might as well be us.
And that when you build technology that improves people’s lives – you don’t need to hide.
The @SEC’s mission is “protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation.” This is a noble mission. I would argue @Uniswap does a far better job of this today than the SEC.
Yes, I'm frustrated that the SEC seems to be more concerned with protecting opaque systems than protecting consumers. And that we'll have to fight a US government agency to protect our company and our industry.
This fight will take years, may go all the way to the Supreme Court, and the future of financial technology and our industry hangs in the balance. If we stand together we can win.
I think freedom is worth fighting for. I think DeFi is worth fighting for.
And of course, we won’t stop shipping. Stay tuned
🦄💜
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Figured I'd dust off some lesser known facts about SBF given today is his sentencing 🧵
1. In January '22, Sam market sold $75M of stETH, leading to a massive depeg event which set off the Celsius bankrun and the daisy chain of events that included the blow-up of 3AC
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
You buy physical textbooks because you don't like reading PDFs
I buy physical textbooks because I've read & pirated the PDF and now want the bookshelf flex
We are not the same
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
No, it's not. Stop your lies. Elon Musk is a Billionaire propagandist. He's the far right's George Soros.
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Positive skewness (kurtosis) is good (bad) for compounding.
Positive (negative) skewness + kurtosis is okay (harmful).
A high Sharpe ratio reduces the effect of skewness and strongly reduces the effect of kurtosis. For high-kurtosis assets, diversification is very important.
Replying to @ReformedTrader
Based on the results of this paper, to solve for the wealth-maximizing portfolio vol target x, solve for ∂W*/∂x as below and set ∂W*/∂x = 0.
x = volatility target of portfolio
s = Sharpe ratio
b = skewness
k = kurtosis
tinyurl.com/bdzjya32
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
CBOE SAYS SPOT BITCOIN ETFS WILL BEGIN TRADING TOMORROW
Source: DB | Coins: BTC
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
We can confirm that the account @SECGov was compromised and we have completed a preliminary investigation. Based on our investigation, the compromise was not due to any breach of X’s systems, but rather due to an unidentified individual obtaining control over a phone number associated with the @SECGov account through a third party. We can also confirm that the account did not have two-factor authentication enabled at the time the account was compromised. We encourage all users to enable this extra layer of security. More information and tips on how to keep your account secure can be found in our Help Center: help.x.com/en/safety-and-sec…
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
David Fincher says MINDHUNTER Season 3 will never happen.
“It's a very expensive show and, in the eyes of Netflix, we didn't attract enough of an audience to justify such an investment.”
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Due numeri su alloggi universitari e possibili soluzioni al problema. Disponibilità alloggi 40k vs numero di studenti fuori sede 570k. Caro affitti medio +20% in tre anni . 960 mil stanziati dal PNRR per 60k alloggi. Sono già stati acquisiti 8k posti letto. Legge di bilancio prevede finanziamento di altri 14k. Tuttavia anche se consideriamo solo gli studenti fuori sede con ISEE inferiore a 24k euro, parliamo di 290k persone. Se anche realizzassimo tutti i progetti ci sarebbe ancora un deficit notevole. Per questo proponiamo (da due anni) un contributo di 400 euro medio mese agli studenti fuori sede con ISEE sotto i 24k. La misura avrebbe un costo inferiore a 1,2 mld.
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Italy's export surge to China
1. Last week we flagged a big rise in Italian exports to China. Here's the story. Without western vaccines, China's consumers are buying a generic liver drug made in Italy that's rumored to prevent COVID. Big thanks to @bancaditalia and @p_ceretti...
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
As I ski through the valley of darkness I hear no evil and see no evil. Don’t let the grotesque and hideous trolls of the TradFi devil keep you from basking in the light of the Lord Satoshi.
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
Ma si possono chiedere le dimissioni dei vertici Rai per due battute di Fedez durante una canzone? Mi sembra indice di un grado di intolleranza inaccettabile. Tra l’altro TG1 e TG2 sembrano gli uffici stampa della Meloni. E vi lamentate pure?
L'attacco degli onorevoli del partito di Meloni: dimissioni per i vertici open.online/2023/02/11/gover…
Alessandro Zuliani retweeted
🧧 #LunarNewYear #Giveaway 🧧
As we leap into the Year of the 🐇, we’re giving away 𝟖𝟖𝟖 $BMEX to 𝟖 lucky KYC’d users on BitMEX.
How to enter:
1️⃣ Follow @BitMEX
2️⃣ Like + RT this post
3️⃣ Tag your fave crypto community/ influencer in the RT
⏳Ends on 30 Jan at 23:59 UTC
































