ππππ±π’ retweeted
Fanart for @MrWasteMaster1
π±ππ
ππππ±π’ retweeted
Fanart for @MrWasteMaster1
ππ
Shark furzonas should be like this, you guys either do a wolf with fins or a blue lizard anal voring a shark
Anyone knows the code for a jav video where two big assed girls wearing blue shorts smothering a guy? Asking for a friendo
and i was already out of a depressive state, i dont wanna flex my missery, i just wanna let you guys know im doing my best to stay at peace at this moment for those who somehow care about me.
ππππ±π’ retweeted
Fanart for @MrWasteMaster1
πβ€οΈππβ€οΈπ
To the pleople who sended me dms at one point, i didnt ghost you but its just fuckin impossible to find messages, and i know for some other artists isnt like that much and you can actually spot peoples dms but i literally got screen recordings scrolling all this for minutes lol
After looking at the digital circus ending i got this, Imagine cyberpunk's storyline but the relic you get its actually the digital circus hard drive with everyone engrams so you end up turning into a twink with Dissociative Identity Disorder
ππππ±π’ retweeted
With PP cracking down on adult content we are going to have to be VERY STRICT from now on
β’ Only use invoices
β’ Give as little info as possible
β’ No handles in the invoice
β’ Give as little info as possible
β’ No "Thank you" messages/reviews
β’ GIVE AS LITTLE INFO AS POSSIBLE
Payment processors are increasingly restricting adult content creators.
PayPal has started issuing permanent account limitations to artists who accept payments for lewd or adult-themed commissions, citing policy violations and unusual activity.
This follows Stripeβs recent move to block lewd projects on Kickstarter.
Private companies are enforcing stricter content rules that go beyond legal requirements. Many independent creators are forced to find alternatives like crypto.
"Online services are complicated"
My brother, there was multiplayer games with bots back in the n64 tf you talking aboutπ
The video game industry is lobbying against Stop Killing Games
California is considering a new law called AB 1921, also known as the Protect Our Games Act.
If passed, the bill would apply to paid digital games sold after January 1, 2027.
It requires that if a company shuts down the online services needed to play the game normally, it must give players 60 days' notice and either release a patch so the game can still be played or offer buyers a full refund.
The bill does not require companies to keep servers running forever. It simply prevents them from making a game unplayable without warning or a solution for those who already paid for it.
The Entertainment Software Association, the main group representing video game companies in the United States, is lobbying against the bill.
Their arguments are basically the usual ones:
>games are licensed, not owned
>online services are complicated
>third-party licenses expire
>security risks exist
>this could be hard or expensive to enforce
Supporters of the bill, including the Stop Killing Games campaign, say this is basic customer protection because when you buy a game, it should not suddenly stop working with no remedy.
The bill gives companies clear options and applies only to future games. A hearing is scheduled for this Thursday in the California Assembly Appropriations Committee.
If you are part of an organization in the United States, especially in California, you can submit a letter of support to the committee. This is an important step for better rights for players who buy digital games.
People who say billie eilish is fat from that ass shot pic please, grab a lightbulb, put it in a blender, then pour in your mouth whats left from that, then swallow as fast as you can
















