Nemesis retweeted
Does the Book of Enoch reveal who the Ningen really are? Ancient accounts of the Watchers and their mysterious offspring have sparked theories about creatures hidden from mankind. Could the Ningen be connected to the forgotten world before the Flood?
Discover the Book of Enoch: thebookofenoch.whop.site
Nemesis retweeted
🇬🇧 Meanwhile in Wales
Rambler accidentally stumbles across this in the Deep Dark Countryside
Probably getting ready for whatever False Flag comes next
Nemesis retweeted
Hear hear @MIT
Nemesis retweeted
🚨 Tucker Carlson reveals what Trump told him days before the Iran war.
"He looked at me and said, 'Yes, you're right. But in the end, we all die anyway, so it doesn't matter.' That's exactly what he said."
Nemesis retweeted
anthropic just stole my best friends research
he spent the last 10 months developing zero knowledge proofs for AI accountability, only for @AnthropicAI to announce remarkably similar research days after he applied for compute support.
Can someone at Anthropic at least let him collaborate instead of jacking his research and calling it their own?
proof attached below
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Anthropic's work on this was public long before. Its Frontier Safety Roadmap lists "provable inference" as a project started in April 2026, with an original deadline of May 15, 2026. The paper builds on years of prior zkML research and has co-authors from EPFL and MIT.
anthropic.com/rsp/roadmap
forkast.news/anthropics-sel…
anthropic.com/research/prova…
Nemesis retweeted
YES. Israeli firms like NSO Group have been linked to recent zero-click iPhone spyware. Citizen Lab confirmed Pegasus infections via iMessage zero-click on Serbian activists and a university rector in late 2025-2026. Candiru was tied to zero-click ad spyware in 2024-2025 cases reported October 2026. Germany's current alerts name no specific actor.
Nemesis retweeted
A key argument made in the so-called independent investigation against Sabatini was that they claimed he used or tolerated crude language in the workplace.
MIT cites the outcome of this investigation as the basis for his removal.
What became clear during the court case was that Knouse routinely used extreme, vulgar, and pornographic language with her student. She would casually describe the state of her vagina and her sexual arousal in graphic terms and made explicit jokes about genitalia, rape, and sex.
These documents are publicly available. MIT was aware of this evidence, yet it continues to claim that Sabatini and his work environment were the problem.
The double standard is glaring.
🤯🤬
“God fuck him”
“Rip his balls”
“Need to seal every crack in the coffin”
—This is how two MIT professors talked about their scheme to bring down Dr. David Sabatini. (Kristin Knouse called it Operation Dethrone.) This was an extensive MeToo hoax that was born out of personal and institutional malevolence.
Nemesis retweeted
“Your best chance of living to a ripe old age is to avoid doctors and hospitals…”
— Dr. Allan Greenberg, MD
A physician says what most WON'T say out loud:
“I can honestly say that unless you are in a serious accident, your best chance of living to a ripe old age is to avoid doctors and hospitals and learn nutrition, herbal medicine and other forms of natural medicine…”
Modern medicine is useful for emergencies and trauma, but for chronic illness it fails us.
**Nutrition IS medicine.**
Healing the root cause — not just masking symptoms — is the real path to lasting health.
Pharmaceutical drugs are toxic. They rarely cure anyone. Instead, they manage symptoms while causing terrible adverse side effects, new diseases, and lifelong dependency.
It’s time to take control of your own health.
Nemesis retweeted
This doc was in our closing arguments.
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES A SHOCKING FOCUS ON PERCEPTION OVER TRUTH — KRISTIN KNOUSE'S PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEAL “THE LONG GAME” IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes extraordinary private communications between Kristin Knouse and Izabella Peña, revealing discussions of perception, personal hostility, intensive interview preparation, and institutional support.
On October 18, 2021, Knouse recounted advice she had received:
🔴 “But she said something like ‘Kristin it’s not about truth but perception…you want to play the long game’”
In the same conversation, Knouse acknowledged her personal hostility toward Sabatini:
🔴 “It’s the same about me not being able to show how angry I am or how much I hate him because it feeds his story that I’m a resentful bitch.”
She also described the preparation she received before her interviews:
🔴 “Yea I mean before my interviews they prepped me intensely. But it really helped because as Elizabeth and WI said they were completely convinced.”
Izabella Peña subsequently wrote:
🔴 “She said the same: the long game”
And:
🔴 “And she said the WI is on my side”
Coming after our previous revelations concerning Whitehead's investigation, the documented communications involving @MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia (@snbhatia), and the institutional decisions that devastated Sabatini's career, Exhibit 228 adds another deeply troubling dimension to the documentary record.
These are the participants' own contemporaneous private messages, documenting their accounts of interview preparation, personal hostility, advice concerning perception rather than truth, a long-term approach, and institutional support.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Nemesis retweeted
Quote from #Lagarde:
“I have been held negligent, but without penalty,without sanction, without registration of the decision.”
— Reuters, 19 December 2016.
I wonder how you escaped prison
imf.org/en/news/articles/201…
Nemesis retweeted
As usual, ALL LIES. Nicotine has benefits, just don't smoke it:
Nicotine acts as a cognitive enhancer by binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), which triggers the release of acetylcholine, dopamine, and norepinephrine to improve focus, attention, and short-term memory. Research indicates it can enhance reaction time and motor coordination, with effects comparable to caffeine or mild Alzheimer's medications in healthy adults.
Nemesis retweeted
I worked on the Film that helped ban Canadians from buying organs from China
And a second Film honouring Canadian human rights, Lawyer David Matias for his work, exposing the crimes.
Yes, China really did kill people to sell their organs
youtu.be/E3v1z7LugyI?si=dyMD…
Nemesis retweeted
Hard for me to see someone who was a colleague at MIT relishing in my destruction. Particularly since they barely knew me and never bothered--as perhaps scientists should--to check if there was another version of events.
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure.
An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini.
The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination.
🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.”
On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse:
🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.”
Knouse responded:
🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.”
🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.”
The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure:
🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “You're right about tenure”
She subsequently wrote:
🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.”
Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter:
🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.”
Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]”
These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation.
🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD.
The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment.
Knouse wrote:
🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.”
She subsequently stated:
🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...”
These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood.
🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION.
In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote:
🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.”
This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below).
🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD.
Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419.
On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared:
🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.”
Knouse also wrote:
🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “That's awesome.”
These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict.
The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Nemesis retweeted
Doctor: "Calcium oxalate stone. I'd cut down on red meat. I'll print you a diet sheet."
Patient: "Does meat have oxalate in it?"
Doctor: "No."
Patient: "What does?"
Doctor: "Spinach, rhubarb, almonds, beetroot. Plants, mostly."
Patient: "So why am I cutting the meat?"
Doctor: "Animal protein raises uric acid."
Patient: "Is my stone uric acid?"
Doctor: "No. Oxalate."
Patient: "So the meat's banned for a stone I haven't got."
Doctor: "It's the standard advice."
Patient: "What's on the sheet?"
Doctor: "Plenty of leafy greens. Nuts as a snack. Almond milk if you're cutting dairy."
Patient: "Spinach, almonds, and almond milk. For an oxalate stone."
Doctor: "It's a general healthy eating sheet."
Patient: "It's the stone's shopping list. What stops oxalate reaching the kidney?"
Doctor: "Calcium in the gut. Binds it, and it passes through."
Patient: "Calcium from?"
Doctor: "Dairy."
Patient: "Which the sheet swaps for almond milk."
Doctor: "..."
Patient: "So I'm to eat the three foods that make the stone, drop the one food that catches it, and give up the one food that does neither."
Doctor: "I can print a different sheet."
Patient: "Print one with a steak and a pint of milk on it. I passed a lentil on Tuesday and I'd like to retire from the hobby."
Nemesis retweeted
Many of these documents have been in the public domain for a long time but were only accessible through the court docket. Post trial they are coming to light.
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE REVEALS EXPLOSIVE COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT A CONCEALED INVESTIGATION INTO PROFESSOR DAVID M. SABATINI — BEFORE WHITEHEAD'S DIVERSITY SURVEY.
🔱 New revelation — Court-disclosed messages describe a plan to use Whitehead Institute's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration.
The court evidence contains extraordinary contemporaneous communications involving Nora Kory, a former postdoctoral researcher in David Sabatini’s laboratory at Whitehead Institute, Kristin Knouse, and references to Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann.
THE PARTICIPANTS' OWN WORDS ARE STUNNING.
Nora Kory stated:
🔴 “Although we know the diversity survey was just a cover up and it was planned long before...”
Knouse responded that Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “was a little loose lipped early on…”
In another exchange, Kory described her discussion with Lehmann:
🔴 “we came up with the idea of ‘covering the investigation up’ with the diversity survey”
Knouse replied:
🔴 “Yea I mean this supports the notion that she has all along wanted to follow through on this but scared to do it without a smoking gun ...”
⚠️ THE SIGNIFICANCE IS PROFOUND.
These are contemporaneous messages in which participants explicitly described the diversity survey as a cover for an investigation they said had already been contemplated.
The communications raise serious concerns that the publicly presented sequence of events may not reflect the discussions taking place behind the scenes.
The references to Ruth Lehmann make the documentary evidence particularly consequential for examining Whitehead's leadership, the origins of the investigation, and the independence of the procedures that followed.
An institutional investigation must be transparent, impartial, and grounded in evidence. Its legitimacy cannot rest on procedures whose stated purpose may differ from the purpose discussed privately by those involved.
The documentary record demands independent scrutiny of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann's decision-making, the origins of the investigation, and the integrity of the procedures that followed.
📑 REVIEW THW ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
