Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark) profile picture

World Editor at AFR, father, Uni lecturer, one-time Labor adviser and former FT correspondent. Hawks! Hablo Español. Not allowed to tweet what I really think.

Sydney
Joined May 2012
Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)Photo by Mark Mulligan (@MulliganMark)
Mark Mulligan retweeted
Massive away win for the little fella.
474
12,506
456
172,679
6,484,067
Mark Mulligan retweeted
right ths way...@FinancialReview
9
80
3
245
9,828
Mark Mulligan retweeted
full transparency.. @FinancialReview
14
115
2
307
9,682
Mark Mulligan retweeted
Saturday read #3. A final curtain for Melanie who left more than rollerskates & chips of Woodstock. WindBackWednesday recalls a conversation that threw back the (mistaken) hippie curtain. "I was being tied to Brigitte Bardot not other songwriters.” bernardzuel.net/post/a-chang…
1
2
5
433
Mark Mulligan retweeted
Thank you, Mick! Get your copy of The Sun Will Rise today! Www.thesunwillrisebook.com
The @financialreview correspondent @mishazelinsky has written a new book about the war in #Ukraine called “The Sun Will Rise”. It is a great read and highly recommended.
4
16
2,171
Seriously, what a clown show. If they’d got the majority they’d crowed about getting in the midterms, this wouldn’t be happening.
Four UPDATES on US Speaker Of House Vote: 1) Jim Jordan says he accepts he lost after he has lost a secret ballot in committee. 2) Steve Scalise says that the House will wait until Monday to continue to figure this mess out. 3) Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy: "I'm concerned about where we go from here" 4) Republican Dusty Johnson: "We're back to square one" Looks like we have another 3 days, at least, without a Speaker during this crucial time in America. What will the solution be?
183
In this Fact Check, we look at Israel’s changing narrative on the deadly bombing of Gaza’s al-Ahli Arab Hospital.
444
4,779
528
7,975
1,035,204
“In emails and conversations after meeting with Trump, Pratt described Trump's remarks to at least 45 others, including six journalists, 11 of his company's employees, 10 Australian officials, and three former Australian prime ministers, the sources told ABC News. “While Pratt told investigators he couldn’t tell if what Trump said about U.S. submarines was real or just bluster, investigators nevertheless asked Pratt not to repeat the numbers that Trump allegedly told him, suggesting the information could be too sensitive to relay further, ABC News was told.” – at Bethesda, MD
Breaking ABC: Months after leaving office, Trump allegedly discussed potentially sensitive information about U.S. nuclear submarines with a member of Mar-a-Lago — an Australian billionaire who then allegedly shared the information with scores of others. abcnews.go.com/US/after-whit…
842
3,203
241
10,405
1,741,451
More Rowe gold ….. funny ‘cause it’s true.
122
Me: “I’m concerned that if the India-Canada imbroglio continues to escalate, then we could see western nations begin to choose sides & it is likely to be Ottawa, placing New Delhi’s partnerships with countries like US, Australia, & UK in greater jeopardy." ft.com/content/aa431779-15d8…
1,352
507
211
2,304
330,291
Mark Mulligan retweeted
I believe that long-term rates, e.g, 30-year rates, will rise further from here. As such, we remain short bonds through the ownership of swaptions. The world is a structurally different place than it was. The peace dividend is no more. The long-term deflationary effects of outsourcing production to China are no more. Workers and unions’ bargaining power continues to rise. Strikes abound, with more likely to come as successful walkouts achieve substantial wage gains. Energy prices are rising rapidly. Not refilling the SPR was a misguided and dangerous mistake. Our strategic assets should never be used to achieve short-term political objectives. Now we must refill the SPR while OPEC and Russia cut production. The green energy transition is and will remain incalculably expensive. And higher gas prices will raise inflationary expectations. Just ask your average American. They see the prices at the pump and in the grocery store and don’t believe inflation is moderating. Our national debt is $33 trillion and rising rapidly. There is no sign of fiscal discipline by either party or by the presumptive presidential nominees. And each debt ceiling is an opportunity for our divided government and its most extreme actors to get media attention, and for our nation to threaten default. This is not a good way to recruit the many new buyers we need for our bonds. The government is selling hundreds of billions of bills, notes and bonds weekly. China and other foreign nations, historically major buyers of our debt, are now selling. And the QT unwind experiment has barely begun. Imagine trying to do a massive IPO where the underwriter, insiders and short sellers are all selling at once, competing to hit every bid on the way down while the analysts downgrade their ratings to ‘Sell.’ Our economy is outperforming expectations. Major infrastructure spending is beginning to contribute to economic growth and the supply of additional debt. Recession predictions have been pushed out beyond 2024. The long-term inflation rate is not going back to 2% no matter how many times Chairman Powell reiterates it as his target. It was arbitrarily set at 2% after the financial crisis in a world very different from the one we live in now. I bumped into the CIO of one of the world’s largest fixed income asset managers the other night and asked him how it was going. He looked like he had had a tough day. He greeted me by saying: ‘There are just too many bonds’ — a veritable tsunami of new issuance each week. I asked him what he was going to do about it. He said: ‘The only thing you can do is step away.’ I have been surprised at how low long-term rates are. I think the best explanation is that bond investors thought of 4% as a high rate of interest because rates hadn’t breached 4% for nearly 15 years. When investors saw the ‘opportunity’ to lock in 4% for 30 years, they grabbed it as a ‘once-in-their-career opportunity,’ but today’s world is very different from the one they have experienced up until now. The long-term inflation rate plus the real rate of interest plus term premium suggests that 5.5% is an appropriate yield for 30-year Treasurys. And query whether 0.5% is a sufficient real long term rate in an increasingly risky world. And the technicals could cause yields to go even higher, particularly in the short term. We saw the beginnings of that today. It wasn’t that long ago that a previous generation thought five percent was a low rate of interest for a long-term, fixed-rate obligation. But I could be wrong. AI might save us.
I have been surprised how low US long-term rates have remained in light of structural changes that are likely to lead to higher levels of long-term inflation including de-globalization, higher defense costs, the energy transition, growing entitlements, and the greater bargaining power of workers. As a result, I would be very surprised if we don’t find ourselves in a world with persistent ~3% inflation. From a supply/demand perspective, long-term Treasurys (T) also look overbought. With $32 trillion of debt and large deficits as far as the eye can see and higher refi rates, an increasing supply of T is assured. When you couple new issuance with QT, it is hard to imagine how the market absorbs such a large increase in supply without materially higher rates. I have also been puzzled as to why the @USTreasury hasn’t been financing our government in the longer part of the curve in light of materially lower long-term rates. This does not look like prudent term management in my opinion. Then consider China’s (and other countries’) desire to decouple financially from the US, YCC ending in Japan increasing the relative appeal of Yen bonds vs. T for the largest foreign owner of T, and growing concerns about US governance, fiscal responsibility, and political divisiveness recently referenced in Fitch’s downgrade. So if long-term inflation is 3% instead of 2% and history holds, then we could see the 30-year T yield = 3% + 0.5% (the real rate) + 2% (term premium) or 5.5%, and it can happen soon. There are many times in history where the bond market reprices the long end of the curve in a matter of weeks, and this seems like one of those times. That’s why we are short in size the 30-year T — first as a hedge on the impact of higher LT rates on stocks, and second because we believe it is a high probability standalone bet. There are few macro investments that still offer reasonably probable asymmetric payoffs and this is one of them. The best hedges are the ones you would invest in anyway even if you didn’t need the hedge. This fits that bill, and also I think we need the hedge.
891
2,269
667
11,994
6,160,769
Mark Mulligan retweeted
that went well @FinancialReview
93
373
10
1,056
43,576