Proof that itās easy to create a facade of intellect if your area of expertise doesnāt require intellectual capability.
The far left love to use it as a trump card to show moral and intellectual superiority.
It's hilarious to see politicians LARP as educated people. Lets take the points she brought up one by one:
>All caps doesn't matter, it is meant to grab the reader's attention. It's standard for an official statement.
>The first lady isn't posting this herself so it is a quote.
>āOver 750ā is fully standard and correct in American English. Preference for āmore thanā is a minor style-guide preference, not a rule.
>Choose (by itself): Can be done freely, or it can be required/forced by a situation. Voluntarily choose is the correct phrasing here.
>There is only one space after the period. That's just the way the text i spaced.
>? It's meant to be a short quote. Not go into detail.
>? Why underline "all elements"?
>No, a passageway does not only describe a hallway. It is a broader term for any path, way, or route used to pass into, through, or out of a space. This also makes the correction of "into" incorrect.
>Only correct part so far, it should be "was" instead of "were".
>Asking which leaders is a content nitpick and not a style or grammar issue.
I find it funny how you (or better yet, your staffer) thought it would be funny to post this only to show they have no actual understanding of what they are writing about. I give your grading an F (because F- does not exist as a grade).
Me when Iām in a āmaking stuff upā competition and Iām up against @DexterCalloway
This is illegal. Full stop.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Apollo lunar samples are NASA property but officially loaned for public, educational and ceremonial displays, including White House Oval Office exhibits and Nixon-era presidential gifts to officials and nations.
nasa.gov/image-article/ā¦
curator.jsc.nasa.gov/Education/publā¦
space.com/space-exploratā¦
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_samā¦
First time doing over 100 miles in my Model S using FSD Hardware 3 with 0 interventions (most of it city/suburban driving)! @TeslaSI has done some serious wizardry with V14 Lite.
Genuinely so funny to see how much people will defend credit cards. The bank have got āem hook, line and sinker.
Replying to @Gaismair
āYou donāt constantly go into debt for small payments so you can get $50 a year in imaginary airplane points?!ā
Casual Rocket Enjoyer retweeted
Replying to @ThePrimalDino
Do you believe that taking an extremely long time to do something makes it safer.. ? like 5 years of development is safer than 2 years? Were NASAās decisions to pivot in weeks for Gemini VI/VII or months for Apollo 8 unsafe, or were they historic examples of competence that kept America in the space race?
Much of the Reddit noise seems to come from people looking for reasons to take out their affinity for specific hardware, political differences, or personality conflicts on Americaās lunar program.
It has been long enough. We have been working for decades on Americaās return to the Moon. We finally have the space policy, political alignment, resources, industry, and talent to accomplish this goal safely after a very long wait.
We have two landers, and we will preserve the option to use either for as long as possible while turning every knob available to improve the probability of success.
That means different vehicle configurations will remain on the table for Artemis IV until they are no longer viable. And for the most committed EUS advocates, it was never going to be an option within the timelines required. The OIG report already covered that. Even getting core stage production to an annual rate is a challenge.
The decision to consider Centaur, stretched Centaur, and other upper-stage options over EUS was made by nonpolitical NASA leadership assessing cost, technical work ahead within timelines. I know this is disappointing to some hardware fans, but the idea that it is all a cover for lander availability does not hold up. NASA would have wanted an Artemis III test before an Artemis IV landing regardless, and an extended-mission Centaur would offer far more value for a lunar base and other applications than EUS. That is the reality.
We are an energized and dynamic NASA and we are not just waiting around for others to deliver. It is NASAās responsibility to drive the outcomes people have been waiting for, and that is exactly what we intend to do.
We are targeting October 23 for the next Artemis update, though that date is not final as folks return from IAC.
Casual Rocket Enjoyer retweeted
If you want to help me help shelter cats, last year Gregory and I raised $10k for the shelter I got him from. Iām hoping to do more this year with his calendar sales! cosmicbackground.io/productsā¦

























