You don’t make the rules you retards lmfaooooooo
Due to numerous violations of the City of Toronto’s social media terms of use, the comment section on this post is now locked. You can find the City’s terms of use here: toronto.ca/socialmedia. Any comments in violation of the terms of use will be removed.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
On X, @cityoftoronto can limit who replies to posts and hide replies but cannot delete other users' comments. Users agree to X's terms by using the platform; the City's terms claim agreement by contributing but enforcement is limited to X features.
help.x.com/en/using-x/x-c…
help.x.com/en/using-x/men…
toronto.ca/home/social-me…
Will retweeted
This was an obvious flagrant 2, so obvious that of 2,300 people polled…93% said it was one
You were ejected based on what the rules call for from a Flagrant 2 foul
So where exactly is the “privilege” involved? Please explain it to us
I’ve never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege (that was your assumption). Try exercising your critical thinking skills, I know you studied psych. Furthermore, I’m the LAST thing from ignorant or asinine when it comes to speaking on “white privilege”, do ya research on that one. I actually went to school, one of the top universities might I add, to educate myself on this exact subject. I would never use that term as a rhetorical weapon knowing the historical and social weight it holds without having the proper evidence to substantiate it.
