Whatever your view respect the honesty he speaks, we will get nowhere if we cannot have constructive dialogue. Work from facts of extensional form, one cannot argue against extensional orientation because it is based on hard facts which are inherently asymmetrical- 'more' or 'less.' We largely orient ourselves by intension, a two valued symmetrical system based on verbal definitions of fictitious motivated reasoning which impairs our predictability as nothing is black or white (symmetrical). Living reactions of intensional form create cognitive patterns where we organize our worldview into rigid, structurally balanced but highly flawed linguistic structures largely engineered for us. Reality is not clean and symmetrical, it's an asymmetrical mess. Be conscious of what you are abstracting from; understand predication trains identification which is inherently non-existent- no river is ever the same moment from moment.