
I write about politics and culture in the Americas and am associate editor @hedgehogreview.
Joined June 2016
- Tweets10.6K
- Following2.8K
- Followers4.8K
- Likes21.8K
Pinned Tweet
Many major developments in American society happen because some group starts doing something that isn't really allowed and then blackmails the state into supporting it after the fact. On "filibusterism" in America:
americanaffairsjournal.org/2…
We'll probably see more and more evidence in the coming years of centrist Democrats' bottomless resentment of their rivals to the left
I appreciate how almost all Portuguese comedy is centered around a guy who is extremely pedantic, whiny, and annoying
Nick Burns retweeted
Yanis is right to criticise judicial overreach in Brazil. It is a central problem of our politics, and it's a disgrace that the left has opportunistically ralied to Moraes since 2023, having spent 2015-21 criticizing the same judiciary and STF.
I am going to write something below that should be seen as the musings of one who celebrated – and still celebrates – Lula’s victory over Bolsonaro Jr. Here it goes:
I cannot for the life of me justify why o why Brazil’s courts had to demand of Bolsonaro that he hands over his passport the moment he lost the election. That he disputed the veracity of the election result is a sign of a faulty character, evidence that he is a bad loser. BUT, he had every right to being a bad loser; to dispute, rightly or wrongly, any result.
As for the argument that he was being investigated for other misdemeanours or crimes, that doesn’t wash either: What would have happened if Bolsonaro had won the election? Would the judges also prevent him from travelling abroad, as President-elect? I very much doubt that – which means that the judges were conflating executive and judicial powers.
To those who tell me that the Bolsonaro clan is a fascistic, criminal family, my reply is: You and I may very well think that. Alas, the judiciary has no right to use its powers to indict and to pursue someone because – or immediately after – they lost an election. It is shameful, to be precise. And it is also dangerous for those of us on the left who know what it means to be banned and hounded by rogue judges and police commissioners.
But I also have a message to Bolsonaro supporters, or those sitting on the fence, who assume that Lula is somehow behind the judges. He is not! This is the same court that imprisoned, falsely, Lula himself. What we have in Brazil is a judiciary that overreaches and habitually crosses the line that ought to separate judicial from political power.
It is such a shame that a judge took it upon himself to go after Bolsonaro on the eve of his defeat and, in doing so, to sully Lula’s stupendous victory.
One last point that my comrades in Brazil should note: If Bolsonaro and Rubio wanted to mount a campaign against Lula and Brazilian democracy they could never have been aided better than by that judge’s reckless writ.
Nick Burns retweeted
HLA Hart critiqued Robert Nozick's "extreme libertarian position" as resting on "the slenderest foundation," one that protects certain rights but otherwise disregards "how a social system actually works, how individuals fare under it, what miseries or inequalities it produces."
Nick Burns retweeted
When Nozick published this thought experiment, Chamberlain — the world’s best and most famous basketball player — was making 20 times the median income. Now every player in the NBA earns that, and there is a player on each team making 800 times the median.
The Wilt Chamberlain argument is one of those uproariously naive conceits only analytic philosophers can be proud of. Imagine a just and equal society, oh but also imagine that it's capitalist and works just like our own, with famous athletes that people pay to see.
The way right-libertarians look to professional sports as a kind of model for government must be studied
Lots of green and yellow flags and national team jerseys alongside the PT red at the Lula celebrations in Rio on Sunday. For the right, claiming the national colors as your own can seem like a symbolic killshot, but if they’re reclaimed you’re left without an identity of your own
Example of what I call "filibusterism" at work: state/order constantly undermined by new emergent forces
Lots of angst on Brazilian right, wishing it had been Tarcísio, but where has the "technocratic" populist-right option (the DeSantis gambit) actually gained real traction? Right populism lives and dies on the charismatic figure of the guy who will throw out the bums. Can't have your PL and your PSDB too.
Short form video is often described as a kind of total dissolution of culture but I'm often surprised by how, often subconsciously, old tropes, gags, structures, going back at least to vaudeville, resurface in new forms.
As the Foro de Teresina hosts anticipated last week, the winning formula was "rua e rede," streets and social media - so not a hyperpolitical campaign but what you might call a "hybrid event with an in-person component"
The huge size and military metaphors of Janones's Lula megachat I think illustrate how the centralizing, top-down traditional approach of the left can provide unique advantages when properly adapted to the shattered contemporary landscape
Mentioned this in passing here
unherd.com/newsroom/lulas-sh…
Wrote about Lula’s win
unherd.com/newsroom/lulas-sh…

















