@OWHistory
Account based inEurope
About this account
- Account based in
- Europe
- Connected via
- Europe App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
I know $ICP will win just don’t know when. I don’t give financial advices, activity just for fun.
ROMAN EMPIRE
Joined December 2025
- Tweets3.5K
- Following396
- Followers881
- Likes10.3K
Dear @dominic_w,
You tried, you failed, not it’s time to step out and give a chance to someone else to try to save your project.
By saving I mean literally – internet-computer:native lost not just billions of its capitalisation but also lost credibility. Just resign.
We need to initiate a vote to remove dom from dfinity or this sh1t will go straight to zero why our competitors print gains.
internet-computer:native
Dr. Munir openly said $ICP may not be the best fit for very high transaction volumes
Let that sink in.
No one cares who invented it at first place, all that matters is is who is the best. And so far near won.
"NEAR did unprecedented work on chain signatures"
"unprecedented" is doing a lot of work here, threshold ECDSA, one key, sign on any chain, no bridge, shipped on internet-computer:native protocol-native, subnet-level DKG, asynchronous & byzantine-robust, with formal security proofs.
NEAR's chain signatures shipped in 2024 and it's not even onchain, but an 8-node, appointed, permissioned side MPC network.
So the "unprecedented engineering" is really "we shipped what ICP shipped protocol native, as offchain MPC."
@NEARProtocol even cites @dfinity math for their offchain MPC bolt-on.😉
Don't believe me? Check the official $NEAR docs: docs.near.org/chain-abstract…
In the "Derivation Paths: One Account, Multiple Chains" section, click the Additive Key Derivation link. It takes you to a @dfinity paper (click the PDF icon on the site).
The funny part is, put the signer contract on any another blockchain (ETH, SOL, SUI... any smart-contract one), attach the MPC bolt-on, and it'll be "unprecedented engineering" for that chain too, without needing $NEAR at all.
btw @LitProtocol already runs the same type, offchain, permissioned MPC, live on Ethereum today. 😉
😂😂😂 after all this hype and enthusiasm in the last few weeks internet-computer:native is still #49 😂😂😂
Actually something positive – for first time in history internet-computer:native it’s not in downtrend va bitcoin:native 👀 it’s actually pretty stable in the last year.
Let’s see next 6-12 months.
So what? Even the #mexc thing was real, you really think a partnership with second tier exchange is something big? This means you have no big expectations about internet-computer:native which shows you are desperate for news.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaa omg guys this community is delulu
$ICP has a Trojan horse problem.
They couldn’t Hack the protocol so they are trying to infiltrate it from the inside through fake sentiment from so called “holders”
Pathetic PSYOP
EVERY internet-computer:native INVESTOR SHOULD READ THIS POST IN DFINITY FORUM 🔥🔥🔥 Dom possibly made the best innovation in web3 but actually lost the race with his competitors because he doesn't know what sales and marketing mean.
All I need for Christmas is $14 internet-computer:native so I can retire
I may trash talk but more than internet-computer:native I hate the internet-computer:native traitors like Jerry.
internet-computer:native may be a scam but it’s our scam and we shouldn’t betray it.
I buy more.
Hey, @dominic_w
It looks like near:native protocol also working on how to bring gains to their investors.
Instead of mock others project they steal from you, try to copy them and actually do something for the people who pays your salary – us, the retail.
The last and only internet-computer:native advantage is dying slowly just because there’s no liquidity in the ecosystem. CK assets are great idea but always - poorly executed by dom who doesn’t understand dfinity should not just extract money from the blockchain but also put into
$ICP What's going on with ckBTC?
Stuck at $76k, when it's 1:1 counterpart is at $81k.
Serious question.
