There is a type of Western feminist who has strong opinions about the hijab and has never once organized against an arms sale. Who discusses Muslim women's autonomy at length and has never read a word about what structural adjustment programs imposed by Western-led financial institutions did to female employment, female education, and female healthcare access across the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia in the 1980s and 1990s. Who can describe in detail the ways Islamic jurisprudence has historically constrained women's rights and cannot name a single woman killed by a drone strike. This feminist is not unintelligent. She has simply inherited a feminism that was constructed within empire, that took imperial priorities as its frame, that universalized a very specific, very Western, very culturally located set of concerns about women's freedom while remaining systematically incurious about the relationship between that freedom and the violence done abroad in its name. Her feminism includes her. It reaches toward Muslim women instrumentally, when their suffering can be used to argue for Western superiority. It does not reach toward the women under the bombs. It does not reach toward the women whose healthcare infrastructure was defunded because the IMF required it. It does not reach toward the women picking through rubble. It was never meant to.