2/ Miles helps oversee CMU’s $4B endowment, with a venture allocation notably larger than many peer institutions.
Conviction = VC's potential for extraordinary outlier returns - in his words, the fat right tail optionality exposure that no other asset class can deliver.
Caution = which mgrs can actually produce those returns, the LPs that can access them & whether today’s megafund math leaves enough room for those outcomes.
1/ Why would an LP who believes 90% of LPs shouldn’t be in venture allocate nearly 1/4 of a university’s endowment to it?
For @CarnegieMellon's Miles Dieffenbach (@Curiousjorge65), the conviction and the caution go hand in hand.
🆕 Origins: Breaking down megafund math👇
"Don't let someone else's outlier change your definition of progress... The goal isn't to win the headlines today. Its to still be building when the cycle turns."
@hpierrejacques on venture’s confidence gap as (anticipated) extreme outcomes at the top distort what "good" looks like everywhere else👇
There is a confidence gap happening in venture capital right now.
On one side, you have new portfolio companies growing at a pace we have never seen before. Companies are going from $0 to millions in revenue seemingly overnight, and the biggest AI companies are creating value at a scale that can make almost everything else feel small.
I saw a chart recently showing that Anthropic, OpenAI and SpaceX alone could potentially generate more returns than decades of tech IPOs. Whether the exact numbers play out or not, it puts the scale of today's biggest winners into perspective.
On the other side, many investors still have significant value tied up in companies from the previous cycle. Some of those companies are still growing 2–5x year over year, but they're struggling to raise capital, founders and employees are tired, and the path to the next round or exit isn't always clear. Eventually, the new companies may grow enough to outweigh the old portfolio, but we're in this weird period where both realities exist at the same time.
That's creating a confidence problem for both investors and founders. You can have a company growing 5x and still feel behind. You can go from $0 to $3M to $10M and wonder why you're not moving fast enough because every week you're reading about another company going from $100M to $1B. As an investor, you can have a portfolio that is objectively performing well and still question whether it matters if you don't own one of the 3, 5 or 10 companies that ultimately define this generation.
The extreme outcomes at the top are distorting our perception of what good looks like everywhere else. I don't think that means the other companies don't matter. There will be generational companies worth $10B or $25B that never become trillion-dollar companies. There will also be great funds that don't own one of the three biggest winners of this cycle.
AI is here to stay, but I don't believe today's growth rates and valuation increases will continue forever. At some point th market will reset, like every cycle eventually does. The hardest thing right now is staying focused when everyone around you is talking about the outliers.
For both founders and investors, the answer is the same: don't let someone else's outlier change your definition of progress. Keep building, keep investing and keep surviving. The goal isn't to win the headlines today. Its to still be building when the cycle turns. Thats where the next generation of great companies will come from.
3/ Well-done research by Aaron Dubin (@team8group) on what it takes to build an enduring venture firm & how LPs can identify promising mgrs before they’re widely recognized.
Download the full report here: team8.vc/report/the-emerging…
1/ What do investors who make the @Forbes Midas List YoY have in common?
70% were founders/operators before VC.
New report by @team8group analyzes Midas + performance data to ask:
Why do Fund Is attract so little institutional capital despite historically strong returns?
5/ Plus: Why @SPintoPeyronel says people have it backwards about retail investors being “fickle,” and why more women should start investing earlier.
Latest Origins episode on YouTube now:
youtube.com/watch?v=E2h2Suxb…
2/ Before @RobinhoodApp, Sarah spent 8 years building the venture program at @EmCollective, backing @OpenAI, @AnthropicAI and @coinbase before they became household names.
Today, she leads Robinhood Ventures and serves as president of Robinhood Ventures Fund II.







