Pinned Tweet
#cellframe - top1 of the PostQuantum Network. 🔥
Unique Layer 0 with post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms selected by NIST: CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium
Multilayered architecture built on top of Layer 0
Written in pure C
Unique consensus model.
$CELL
$noid
ALT Cellframe is a scalable blockchain platform for building and connecting networks and services. It stands out for its post-quantum cryptography and developer tools.
Pam Creighton retweeted
#cellframe - top1 of the PostQuantum Network. 🔥
Unique Layer 0 with post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms selected by NIST: CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium
Multilayered architecture built on top of Layer 0
Written in pure C
Unique consensus model.
$CELL
$noid
ALT Cellframe is a scalable blockchain platform for building and connecting networks and services. It stands out for its post-quantum cryptography and developer tools.
Pam Creighton retweeted
Crypto’s post-quantum debate is getting louder, but some teams have been building for years.
Which of these communities has your attention right now?
Vote, then tell me why. If yours isn’t listed, name it in the replies 👇
50%Algorand ($ALGO)
26%QRL ($QRL)
20%Cellframe ($CELL)
4%Quantus ($QTC)
364 votes • Final results Pam Creighton retweeted
#cellframe - top1 of the PostQuantum Network. 🔥
Unique Layer 0 with post-quantum cryptography (PQC) algorithms selected by NIST: CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium
Multilayered architecture built on top of Layer 0
Written in pure C
Unique consensus model.
$CELL
$noid
ALT Cellframe is a scalable blockchain platform for building and connecting networks and services. It stands out for its post-quantum cryptography and developer tools.
Pam Creighton retweeted
🔺 Join us this Friday, September 11th, for the traditional AMA session with Dmitry Gerasimov, CEO of Demlabs and lead of the Cellframe project!
🔘Drop your questions for Dmitry in the comments below — he'll answer the best ones.
Here are the details:
📌 September 11th
This AMA session is going to be special — Dmitry will share exciting news and talk about significant updates being prepared across the Cellframe ecosystem. You won't want to miss it!
Where to watch:
• Our YouTube channel: youtube.com/@cellframenetwor…
Don't miss your chance to get the latest news about Cellframe — ask your questions and stay tuned!
#AMA_cellframe
Pam Creighton retweeted
$NOID bana biraz $KAS’ın ilk zamanlarını hatırlatıyor. Şu quantum meselesiyle beraber daha çok konuşulabileceğini düşünüyorum.
Kendi chaini ve madenciliği var, özellikle ödeme sistemi fikirlerini sevdim.
Quantum dayanıklı sistemlere henüz ihtiyacımız yok ama yangın tüpünü de ev yanmaya başladıktan sonra değil öncesinde alıyoruz sonuçta.
Pam Creighton retweeted
This is $NOID !
Wrapped zkAPI + Tor + extra cover traffic + local LLM prompt rewriting in an open-AI compatible daemon, and made a "paranoid mode" wrapper for my agent harness (pi):
Each conversation gets assigned a separate Tor circuit, your requests are masked with random cover traffic, zkAPI ensures you don't leak your identity through payments, and all prompts are locally rewritten (bring-your-own-local-model; I'm using qwen3.8-flash-next)
github.com/vbuterin/zkapi/tr…
My agent harness is wrapped with a bwrap sandbox (also experimenting with MicroVM) and wrapped again with torsocks, so everything it does goes through Tor.
Here's what me asking it to do a simple research task looks like.
It's getting quite usable! Though you definitely still pay quite a bit in increased latency, especially when starting a new conversation.
Also, Tor is far from optimal here for privacy; the cover traffic mechanism is okay against passive adversaries but much weaker if the LLM provider is colluding with the guard and actively manipulating timing. This kind of task really requires a more specialized mixnet, probably take the tradeoff of a higher bandwidth multiplier and built-in constant cover traffic.
Also also, much cheaper zkAPI deposit and withdraw gas costs are coming to mainnet soon.
Pam Creighton retweeted
$noid went $0.19 → $0.598 since my oct 9 post and its still a $3.9m mc pow l1. the supply map shows who can sell next
> tl;dr dev funds: 1m locked till january. safetrade: 4.58m, 42% of all noid. the $0.598 top printed the same day +345k landed on that wallet
pic 1, the price (safetrade.com/exchange/NOID-…):
- $0.19 at my post, $0.598 top on oct 15, $0.357 now
- 10.8m net supply x $0.357 = ~$3.9m mc. even at the top it was ~$6.4m
- for scale, $qtc's liquid float on the same quantum narrative is ~$33m (x.com/Checker1crypto/status/…)
pic 2, who holds the 10.8m (noidexplorer.org/richlist):
- safetrade: 4,575,848 = 42.4%
- two dev fund vaults: 1,000,000 = 9.3%
- one wallet that pulled ~566k off safetrade on oct 4-5: 500,000 = 4.6%
- everyone else, ~2,180 addresses: ~4.72m = 43.7%
pic 3, the dev side (github.com/ignotusnemo/paran…). on oct 9 i flagged the 10% dev cut with no reports (x.com/Checker1crypto/status/…). a week later:
- 1,059,840 noid received, 25,278 spent on bug bounties, no sales listed
- 1,000,000 locked in 2 vaults until block 490,000 (~jan 16), checkable in your own wallet via f7 (x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21…)
> the exchange wallet is the tell. oct 14-15 it took in +653k net, 7x what the chain mined, and the top came right in that window. the last 24h flipped to -83k net out (noidexplorer.org/address/o1h…)
props to @ignotus_nemo for answering a supply critique with a vault contract instead of a thread, and for shipping v2.0.4 with the legacy matrices gone, exactly as he told me in replies (x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21…)
the risk:
- new fund payouts land unlocked, 4,608 noid a day, ~418k more by block 490,000
- 42% on one cex is one custody risk and most of the sell side
- thin book: ~$4.6k of asks and ~$1k of bids within 10% of mid
> so when you see "one pool makes ~85% of $noid blocks", now you know: over the last 3,000 blocks the top miner address made 30.4%, the top two 53% (noidexplorer.org)
3x in 8 days, open source, contracts live on mainnet, and still a $3.9m mc. so whose is the 500k wallet?
$noid is a ~$1.9m mc pow l1, and on sunday its only steady seller gets 79% less to sell
> tl;dr block 210,537 cuts new supply from 216k to 46k noid a day. one cex, the same one $qtc sat on at ~$20 before near
10.1m noid x $0.19 = ~$1.9m. math, book and the 10% nobody mentions:
pic 1 is straight from the docs (docs.parano1d.org/protocol/e…):
- now: 50 noid every 20s = 216k/day, ~$41k at $0.19
- after block 210,537: 16 noid every 30s = 46k/day, ~$9k
- 1.47m noid traded on safetrade in 24h (safetrade.com/exchange/NOID-…), so fresh supply drops from ~15% of daily flow to ~3%
the fork itself is priced, its on every timeline. the flow after it isnt
> the book rn: ~$2.4k of asks within 10% above mid vs ~$18k of bids within 10% below. with ~194k fresh noid/day landing in miner wallets, theres no reason to market buy a thin side
eta oct 11 ~07:00 utc. coincodex still shows mc as "-" (coincodex.com/crypto/parano1…) bc supply isnt reported. ~10.1m net supply per the explorer, cited in the dev interview (crypto-lowcap.com/parano1d-i…)
same venue as $qtc: safetrade was its only market, ~$20 before near intents opened it oct 6, ~$180 two days later. different beast tho: qtc has a 21m cap and a vc team, noid has one anon dev and no cap. my qtc read: x.com/Checker1crypto/status/…
props to @ignotus_nemo for shipping v2.0.3 two days before the fork with a repro attached: old build +251 mib over 600 write cycles, patched +0 (x.com/ignotus_nemo/status/21…)
the risk is in pics 2 and 3:
- pre v2 readme: "no premine", then 90% to the miner, 5% to o(1) network fund, 5% to parano1d lab (github.com/ignotusnemo/paran…)
- current docs: the split survives v2 and runs to block 3,223,778, ~3y from genesis
- ~1m noid to the two funds so far by the docs math, ~$190k at $0.19
- v2 year one still prints up to 16.8m noid on a 10.1m supply. one cex, one core dev
> so when you see "no premine, fair launch", now you know: no premine is true, but 1 in 10 noid mined goes to the dev side for ~3 years
the old readme promised periodic reports from both funds. if youve seen one, drop it below
weeks thing, not a 1h flip. watch the book after block 210,537, not the candle
now you know more about $noid than 99% of ct. nfa dyor
Pam Creighton retweeted
A little sneak peek into noidexplorer.org
With $NOID v2 we bring more beauty to our explorer.
New animations, new halving-, new economics- and new mempool-tabs should activate automatically on block 210.537.
①
Pam Creighton retweeted
Parano1d $NOID official links:
website: parano1d.org
docs: docs.parano1d.org
lab: lab.parano1d.org
autoresearch: noid.network
discord: discord.gg/MxtdCBm2S9
github: github.com/ignotusnemo/paran…
x(twitter): nitter.cf/ignotus_nemo
All other resources are third-party or community-built. You can find the full list on parano1d.org.
Parano1d is a live proof-native L1 where the present proves the past. Proofs establish validity. PoW sets canonical order.
Signatureless authorization, execution and recursion share one transparent end-to-end post-quantum stack.
V2 adds proof-native contracts: programmable live rights verifiable after pruning. Nodes verify state and rights from genesis without replay or trusted checkpoints.
Block bodies and transactions are pruned after retention. Receipts remain verifiable.
Mainnet is live.
Pam Creighton retweeted
Mathematics behind Parano1d's proof-native architecture.
Preprint published: Transparent Proof-Carrying State over Binary Tower Fields
zenodo.org/records/23485635
Recursive State verification, authenticated GKR reductions, heterogeneous recursion, security bounds and real proving benchmarks. Theorems, proofs, reproducible experiments and open research questions.
@Too_Avon Learn how to turn successful with your own home business vatoo.net/annb21.php