@PDWriter

Freelance aerospace, defence and tech writer, sceptical observer of economics. #MMT, #JobGuarantee, #ModernJubilee, #JC4PM2019, #BlackLivesMatter, he/him

UK
Joined February 2009
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Replying to @ProfHall1955
Back to the war capitalism of the 17th century when monolithic trading companies operated as de facto nation states with their own laws violently extracting resources with their own private armies.
6
51
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Replying to @NadirIndar
Should be. But 900 years of commercial culture corrupted our values and postponed any movement towards that.
1
7
128
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Replying to @ProfHall1955
What’s the real value of gold? Or, of anything? Land, human talent, culture? Isn’t the best investment healthy and educated humans?
1
2
3
153
Peter Donaldson retweeted
This is a mark-to-market price, so no collapse of the US$ yet, but it does suggest early tectonic movement. To cover the base, Donald and the boys will steal as much gold as they can from vulnerable nations, proving beyond doubt what the US and the Euro imperial nations before them always have been - organised crime gangs.
Gold reserves hits $5 trillion, overtaking U.S. Treasuries as the world's top reserve asset
5
101
5
214
4,842
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Ancient Middle East, roughly 1000 BCE. Multiple religions suddenly develop prohibitions against pork. Judaism, Islam, later various Christian sects. The explanation given is hygiene. Pork carries trichinosis. It's "unclean." But here's the interesting part: Cattle and sheep carry diseases too. Anthrax, brucellosis, various parasites. Yet beef and lamb are deemed clean and acceptable. The real reason for pork prohibition is economic and political. Pigs are democratic animals. They're easy to raise. Any peasant family can keep a pig, feed it scraps, and have meat for winter. Pigs don't require large grazing lands. They convert waste into protein efficiently. Cattle and sheep, however, require pasture. Land. Lots of it. Land that must be controlled, owned, managed. Land that concentrates in the hands of those wealthy enough to hold it. In ancient societies, if everyone can raise pigs, everyone has access to meat. Power disperses. But if meat requires cattle grazing on large estates, meat access becomes controllable. The priests and rulers who established dietary laws weren't idiots. They understood that pork democratized protein access. A peasant with a pig was independent. A peasant dependent on beef from landlord's cattle was controlled. The "unclean" designation wasn't about parasites. It was about power. This pattern repeats through history. Medieval European nobility consumed pork freely while peasants were restricted. Victorian England saw pork associated with lower classes while beef signified wealth and status. Modern industrial agriculture has inverted some of this. Factory-farmed pork became cheap commodity meat. But the cultural associations remain. Beef is prestigious. Pork is common. The interesting thing is pork is nutritionally excellent. High in fat, rich in B vitamins, contains all essential amino acids. It's particularly high in thiamine, crucial for metabolism. But it was shamed, restricted, and prohibited not because it was inferior, but because it was too accessible. When everyone can access protein, hierarchies flatten. The elites have always understood this. That's why pork was made "unclean" while beef and lamb were sanctified. Control the meat supply, control the population. If that meat supply is too easy to produce independently, demonize it.
1,065
2,305
454
8,795
491,008
Peter Donaldson retweeted
You say it’s not Israel’s fault people are starving in Gaza? Then tell me: Who dropped leaflets warning civilians to flee, and then bombed every route out? Who bombed aid convoys? Who attacked ambulances? Who shelled UN warehouses storing food and medical supplies? Who turned back entire truckloads of flour and insulin, then had the gall to blame the people they’re starving? You want to blame Hamas and the UN for the hunger of children in a territory that’s been under Israeli siege since 2007, sealed off from air, sea, and most land routes? That’s like setting a house on fire, blocking the exits, and then blaming the people inside for not getting out. Let’s be clear. Israel controls Gaza’s borders. Israel controls Gaza’s airspace. Israel controls Gaza’s maritime zone, its population registry, its electricity, fuel, and aid. It has the power to let food in. It has the power to let people out. It has the power to stop bombing the very corridors aid is supposed to pass through. And yet—somehow—the people with no ports, no airports, no army, no freedom of movement, and no escape are the ones you hold responsible for not distributing aid fast enough? Your logic doesn’t just collapse under scrutiny. It confesses itself. You don’t care about whether aid reaches starving people. You care about protecting the image of a state that’s created a starvation regime, and then outsourced the blame. You’ve mistaken a siege for self-defense. Occupation for order. And mass suffering for an unfortunate side effect of Arab dysfunction. But here's the truth: When a child starves to death in Gaza, it’s not because the UN misplaced the box. It’s because Israel built the cage. And you’re here blaming the people trapped inside.
If people are starving in Gaza it’s not because Israel hasn’t sent aid in. It’s because Hamas and the UN haven’t let it get to the people of Gaza.
152
1,447
50
4,407
88,989
Two years ago, during my detention which lasted 47 days, my hands were tied behind my back and I was forced to keep my head bent down toward my knees for long hours during transport in military vehicles… more than 8 hours of pain and helplessness. That wasn’t enough—they also beat me with sticks on my shoulder and back. After my release, I went through a two-month treatment journey between medication and physical therapy until the pain disappeared… or so I thought. Five days ago, the pain returned to the same area, but this time it is much worse. It doesn’t respond to painkillers, muscle relaxants, or even massage sessions. The pain is increasing day by day, to the point where I can barely lift my arm or hold anything with my right hand. What I am going through is not an individual case… there are tens of thousands suffering in silence, between undiagnosed injuries, neglected pain, and a system that does not provide even the minimum level of care. What happened to me was not just a moment that passed… it is an ongoing impact, a wound that reopens every time I think it has healed. The occupation is responsible for this pain… responsible for everything we suffer, both physically and mentally. Pray for my recovery… and for justice and freedom for all of us. The image was generated by artificial intelligence for illustrative purposes.
215
7,406
77
20,005
519,411
Peter Donaldson retweeted
I cannot believe how stupid we were to think that if only the Holocaust was known about in advance we’d have stopped it. Gaza destroys all of the pretty little lies people hold about society. This is Hell, with absolute vermin in control.
206
4,832
83
22,618
299,402
Absolutely extraordinary exchange between Israel and China 👇 I've never seen such a heated exchange come out of top-level forum in China (this is from the 12th Beijing Xiangshan Forum that started yesterday), this normally never happens. The guy speaking is Yan Xuetong, the dean of the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University, the most prestigious university in China. Speaking for Israel is a military officer apparently called Elad Shoshan. Yan Xuetong truly doesn't hold back: - When the Israeli officer tries to bullshit him around how Israel supposedly protects civilians in Gaza, he replies: "You killed more than 70,000 civilians!... The fact is not decided by you... It is not decided by your government. Your government has no legitimacy or the right to decide or defend what is fact" - And when told that the war will end when Hamas release hostages he replies: "No, this kind of propaganda have too many. No one believe it! Too many! Too much! No one believe it, except a few Israelis"
2,888
28,112
2,540
88,048
5,018,175
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Israel is toast. Whoring Western government officials and media scum won't be able to hold the door shut much longer. Humanity sees what's going on, and will never unsee it I am sorry and ashamed for Jews and Israelis who have become deranged mass murderers in the name of such a blatantly stupid and anti human ideology. I think they will live to bitterly regret it
582
4,266
100
19,802
914,345
Going back to prison - for the sixth time. Half a year behind bars for refusing to take part in Israel’s crimes. No to genocide. No to oppression. No to occupation. No to apartheid. We refuse to hold a weapon. Will you refuse to supply it?
אני חוזר היום לכלא – בפעם השישית. חצי שנה מאחורי סורגים כי אני לא מוכן לעצום עיניים. אמרו לנו שצה"ל מגן עלינו אמרו לנו ש"אין ברירה". עד מתי נקבל את השקר הזה? הגדה בוערת. עזה הרוסה. עשרות אלפים נרצחו. זה לא "הגנה" – זה משטר כוחני שמאבד צלם אנוש. מה הקו האדום שלכם? שלי עבר מזמן
1,170
9,873
535
54,237
1,749,570
Peter Donaldson retweeted
If you are Vietnamese and "shocked" by me comparing Khamenei to Hồ Chí Minh, ask yourself very simply: Shocked by what exactly? That he led a country demonized by America? That he refused to kneel to Washington and Tel Aviv? That he chose sanctions over surrender? That he was called a monster by the same media that once called us "gooks" and "communist aggressors"? You do not have to love Iran. You do not have to agree with everything Khamenei ever did. But if you grow up on stories of Điện Biên Phủ, of the Trường Sơn trail, of B52s over Hà Nội, and then you find yourself instinctively defending the narrative of the very empire that napalmed your grandparents, you should pause. Hồ Chí Minh and Khamenei are not identical men. Vietnam is not Iran. Our paths, cultures, and systems are different. The comparison is about something else: Both led countries that refused to be obedient clients. Both were marked for destruction by the same empire. Both were turned into caricatures so that bombs and sanctions would look like "justice" to Western audiences. Both paid, and made their people pay, a huge price to hold a line against a global system that prefers compliant oil monarchies and comprador elites. If you can understand why Uncle Hồ accepted isolation, bombing, hunger, and demonization rather than hand Vietnam back to France and America, you already understand the logic of why Iran chose resistance over humiliation. If that logic looks noble when it is Vietnamese, but "fanatic" when it is Iranian, then the shock is not moral. It is colonial. You are uncomfortable that someone placed our own symbol of resistance next to a man your enemies told you to hate. So instead of interrogating their propaganda, you defend it for free. We do not honor Hồ Chí Minh because he was perfect. We honor him because he refused to sell our future for comfort. Khamenei, for his people, played a similar role: a leader the empire could never buy, who chose to live and die under siege rather than kneel. If that comparison offends you, fine. But be honest about why. Is it because you truly believe no nation has the right to resist empire the way we did? Or is it because somewhere along the way, you started seeing through American eyes which struggles are "legitimate" and which are "terrorism"? As a Vietnamese, I will not let the country that slaughtered ours dictate which other nations are allowed to fight back with dignity.
237
2,025
122
7,604
215,026
Peter Donaldson retweeted
The same countries that lecture Serbia about democracy and human rights are the ones that: - Bombed us in 1999 - Recognized Kosovo against international law - Sanction us for defending our sovereignty And they wonder why we don't trust them. But here's what really gets me: these same countries have their own separatist movements and land disputes right now. Let's start with Cyprus. An EU member state has been split in half since 1974. Turkey invaded and occupied the northern third of the island. Created the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" - recognized by exactly one country: Turkey. The rest of the world, including the entire EU, calls it occupied territory. Cyprus has been divided for 50 years. The EU calls it "occupied" and refuses to recognize Northern Cyprus. They negotiate carefully. They talk about patience and dialogue. "Both sides have legitimate concerns." "We need time." "It's complicated." Why the gentle approach? Because Turkey has the second largest military in NATO. Over 400,000 active troops. Controls the Bosphorus Strait. Sits on Russia's southern border. They need Turkey in their alliance more than they care about Cyprus being whole. So they tolerate the occupation. They don't bomb Ankara. They don't sanction Turkish leaders. They just quietly accept that some territorial disputes are "complicated" when the occupier is strategically useful. But Kosovo? They recognized it in weeks. Called it self-determination. Sent NATO to make it happen. Spain has Catalonia trying to break away. UK had Scotland vote on independence twice and still manages Northern Ireland tensions. France deals with Corsica. Italy handles northern separatism. Basque Country spans both France and Spain. How do Western countries treat their own territorial disputes? Very, very carefully. They inject money. They deploy NGOs. They negotiate endlessly. They do everything possible to keep those fires from spreading and exposing cracks in their own unity. When it's their borders, self-determination suddenly becomes "complicated." Constitutional concerns matter. Stability is important. We need dialogue and patience. But when Yugoslavia was falling apart? They backed every separatist movement. They armed them. They bombed us for 78 days for trying to hold our country together. They recognized Kosovo before the smoke cleared. It's one thing to support a neutral country falling apart when you're watching from a distance. When it's someone else's land. Someone else's people. Someone else's history being erased. But touch their borders? Suddenly they're very quiet. Very careful. Very diplomatic. The hypocrisy isn't even hidden. It's policy.
25
49
239
2,782
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Russia pulled back from Kiev because of the Istanbul negotiations. The agreement was nearly signed. Then came Bucha. Then Boris Johnson arrived. Zakharova explains how it all happened.
253
855
37
2,496
42,886
Peter Donaldson retweeted
There's absolute hysteria going on right now about Russia escalating the war on European NATO territory, originating from a variety of European leaders and politicians to random commentators on X. Out of all times in the past four and a half years, Russia has the least incentive to escalate right now. Ukraine is out of interceptors, and Russia's retaliatory campaign to Zelensky's "40 day special influence operation" has been decimating Ukrainian logistics and completely paralized merrytime shipping in the Black Sea. Ukraine is about to face the harshest winter since the start of the conflict, because the country is completely broke and doesn't even have money to prepare for it, as admitted by Ukrainian officials. All of this smells like a concerted psyop. Prepare for a mass casualty false flag event on NATO soil. Zelensky and his European handlers don't have anything else left in the arsenal. This is going to be the last all-in move to get NATO directly involved and/or force the EU to allocate some emergency cash to the Kiev regime. This ain't going to be pretty.
68
176
32
800
22,591
Peter Donaldson retweeted
We are still here in Gaza… Hungry, tired, but not giving up. My family is asking for food, and all I can offer them is hope. If you can see this post, please leave a comment and help us if you can. chuffed.org/project/200902
10
23
399
Also note: cutting VAT does nothing to rein in the obscene profits of energy companies. Labour are the Party of Corporations and oligarchs.
Westminster mathematics: Ministers boasting about a £150 VAT cut while energy bills surge by £300 is the definition of taking people for fools. Savings of £3 a week mean nothing when standard tariffs are jumping by ten times that amount in the same breath. Working-class households do not live in the abstract world of Westminster accounting tricks. Taking £3 off a weekly bill while £300 is added to the annual total is not relief; it is simple arithmetic being weaponised to cover for systemic failure. You cannot deliver on affordability by rearranging the deckchairs on a failing system. Until the government tackles the structural greed of energy producers, bragging about penny-shaving on VAT is just insulting the intelligence of the voters who put them there. #energypriceshock
18
33
699
Peter Donaldson retweeted
Good morning from Gaza to all the good people of the world.
41
106
660
5,477