Quaverick (@PQCArchive) header
Quaverick (@PQCArchive) profile picture

Post-Quantum Cryptography. Migration risk. Timelines.

Joined January 2025
Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)Photo by Quaverick (@PQCArchive)
while most of crypto is still debating whether the quantum threat matters, the team @trailofbits currently auditing zond ($qrl 2.0) is actively reducing the resources needed to attack secp256k1. think about that for a minute.
We beat Google's quantum circuit again, and we didn't have to forge a proof this time. Today we're releasing trailmix, a toolkit for quantum "kickmix" circuits. It includes 5 new circuits we built for elliptic curve addition, the hardest part of Shor's algorithm.
2
10
38
1,805
Quaverick retweeted
When the world is hit by a storm, a safe haven makes all the difference. 🌊 Quantum-resistant since 2018, $QRL was built for the future we're moving toward. A quantum-safe haven for your digital money. #PostQuantum #QRL
1
11
1
27
521
Quaverick retweeted
The post-quantum path @Starknet is taking is revealing more serious loopholes in blockchain design than I thought. StarkWare built a framework from NIST's 'general crypto-agility guidance' to test how agile blockchains are, and only one chain scored 8/8. Bitcoin itself passes 7 of the 8 tests, tied for second among the 10 chains scored, yet it faces one of the hardest migrations. NIST wrote the guidance but doesn't rate chains, so StarkWare built the 8 questions and scored the networks itself. It's a bit technical, but let's review it. ➥ Based on NIST's guidance on crypto agility, the 8 questions ask whether a chain can replace its cryptography and keep running: 1. Can an existing account switch to a new signature without a network upgrade? 2. Can its formats handle bigger keys and signatures? 3. Can one cryptographic part be replaced without redesigning the rest? 4. Can old and new signing run side by side undedr migration? 5. Has the transition been tested? 6. Can an attacker be stopped from forcing a weaker algorithm? 7. Can the old algorithm be switched off after migration? 8. Can existing data be migrated? A point only counts if the path works today under current rules. Anything that needs a future upgrade scores zero. Across 10 networks the scores are @Starknet 8, @Bitcoin 7, @Algorand 7, @NEARProtocol 7, @QRLedger 6, @Zcash 6, @ethereum 3, @solana 2, @Optimism 2 and @RobinhoodCrypto 1. ➥ The test that separates Starknet from the 7s is the first one. On Starknet every account is a smart contract, so a wallet can replace its signature check and keep its address and funds. StarkWare confirmed this with @ready_co. A coin on the Bitcoin network has to move to a new address to use new cryptography, and NEAR and Algorand accounts can only choose schemes the protocol has already switched on, nothing more. What I respect most is what the score does not claim. It is not a security rating. QRLedger scores 6 yet shows lower exposure on the same Hub, because its signatures are already hash-based. Starknet's standard accounts still sign with elliptic curves, and its post-quantum Falcon-512 account is an unaudited mainnet demo that ordinary users can't adopt yet. So my takeaway is that being able to change and having already changed are two different things, and a chain needs both. Next, I'll break down where Starknet stands on the second. For now, what's your take on this?
1/ Bitcoin passes 7 of our 8 cryptographic-agility checks. So why does it still face one of the hardest post-quantum migrations? Because upgrading the network's cryptography is one thing. Moving everyone's BTC is another 🧵
25
10
129
6,321
Quaverick retweeted
Most "quantum-safe" coins have a whitepaper. $QRL has Trail of Bits audits, NIST-standard crypto (ML-DSA-87, ML-KEM-1024), university research grants and a seat in the Post-Quantum Cryptography Alliance. Receipts, all sourced: theqrl.org/contributions (I hold $QRL. NFA.)
4
12
1
41
809
The ECDSA.fail challenge just crossed 70.0%. 👀 Will crypto migrate to post-quantum security in time? $QRL #PostQuantum
6
17
375
Q-Day in 2029? Justin Drake on November 3: "Behind closed doors, the CEO of a particular multi-billion dollar quantum company is saying that he has 99% conviction that Q-Day will happen in 2029." Drake himself puts the probability of Q-Day by 2029 at 10%.
3
6
2
19
534
What if AI breaks our cryptography before quantum computers do? Justin Drake on November 3: "AI is coming up with new alien mathematics that may be able to break our cryptography without quantum computers."
1
4
12
331
Quaverick retweeted
Justin Drake on Shor's algorithm runtime for breaking ECDSA... "This month, there's going to be a breakthrough paper that further reduces the runtime by an order of magnitude. We're going to go from minutes to seconds." Source: youtube.com/watch?v=rqJ5ir-8…
1
1
7
219
Most "quantum-safe" coins have a whitepaper. $QRL has Trail of Bits audits, NIST-standard crypto (ML-DSA-87, ML-KEM-1024), university research grants and a seat in the Post-Quantum Cryptography Alliance. Receipts, all sourced: theqrl.org/contributions (I hold $QRL. NFA.)
4
12
1
41
809
I wonder if $QRL should raise more awareness of its relevance as both quantum computing and AI advance. Quantum computers threaten ECDSA, while AI could accelerate cryptographic research and potentially uncover new weaknesses. QRL already uses post-quantum signatures instead of ECDSA. That seems like a message worth spreading. #QuantumSafe #Cryptography
1
11
1
35
534
Holy cow! Could ECDSA break sooner than we think? 👀 Justin Drake’s take is worth watching. #PostQuantum #Cryptography $ETH $QRL youtu.be/rqJ5ir-8hAQ?si=Dyab…
11
21
569
$QRL consistently at the top of PQ crypto listings
Imagine waking up to discover the cryptography protecting billions in crypto assets may no longer be secure. Crypto talks about scalability and adoption. What if computers challenge the cryptography protecting our wallets? Current quantum computers cannot break blockchains, but research is advancing. I researched the threat, projects and opportunity. THE THREAT Blockchains use digital signatures to authorize transactions. Bitcoin and Ethereum rely on elliptic-curve cryptography, which a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could attack with Shor’s algorithm to derive private keys from exposed public keys. Grover’s algorithm offers a quadratic speedup against hashes and symmetric encryption. “Harvest now, decrypt later” means storing encrypted data today for future decryption. THE ALTERNATIVE: PQC NIST finalized in 2024: → ML-KEM: shared-key establishment. → ML-DSA: lattice-based signatures. → SLH-DSA: hash-based signatures. Migration means larger signatures, higher verification costs and upgrades to wallets, contracts and validators. Cryptographic agility matters. PROJECTS TO WATCH 1. QRL ($QRL) — Uses XMSS, a hash-based quantum-resistant one-time signature scheme. 2. Algorand ($ALGO) — Uses FALCON for state proofs and account authorization; broader upgrades targeted by end-2027. 3. Starknet ($STRK) — Account abstraction enables custom signatures. An experimental quantum-resistant wallet transacted on mainnet in July 2026 (~$0.06). STARK proofs use hash-based assumptions, but not every component is quantum-safe. 4. QANplatform ($QANX) — Building lattice-based signatures and QAN XLINK for account migration. 5. Abelian ($ABEL) — Lattice-based cryptography with privacy features. 6. Nervos ($CKB) — Exploring alternative authentication and SPHINCS+-related approaches. 7. Project Eleven — Yellowpages aims to coordinate quantum-safe protection for bitcoin holdings without an immediate fork. 8. Ethereum — Targets quantum resistance across execution, consensus and data by December 2029. 9. Cardano — Exploring post-quantum integration, including Dilithium signatures. 10. Sui ($SUI) — Plans ML-DSA-65 accounts and SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s vaults; mainnet target Q1 2027, subject to audits. 11. Quantus — Post-quantum mainnet launched September 2026; QTC introduced in October. 12. Bitcoin — StarkWare’s experimental QSB enabled a quantum-safe mainnet transaction in August 2026. Optimization cut estimated compute cost $320→$67 (~79%); $67 was a benchmark, not a second transaction. QSB cannot protect coins with exposed public keys; a soft fork remains the broader fix. WHY NOW? Google Quantum AI’s March 2026 estimates put attacks on 256-bit elliptic-curve cryptography at fewer than 1,200–1,450 logical qubits. These are error-corrected, not today’s noisy physical qubits; this is theoretical, not a practical attack. WHERE’S THE OPPORTUNITY? Opportunities: quantum-safe wallets, migration, efficient verification, account abstraction, agility, custody and interoperability. Quantum resistance doesn’t guarantee token value. Watch deployment, audits, adoption and full-stack protection. RESEARCH WATCHLIST Quantum-focused: $QANX @QANplatform | $CELL @cellframenet | $QRL @QRLedger | $ABEL @PQabelian | $NAORIS @NaoXprotocol Established / other: $ALGO @Algorand | $XDC @XDCNetwork | $STRK @Starknet | $HBAR @hedera | $IOTA @iota | $CKB @NervosNetwork | $XNT @NeptunePrivacy | $ZEC @Zcash Also: @projecteleven, @ethereum, @Cardano_CF, @SuiNetwork, Quantus. Research watchlist: some have deployed components; others are still researching or planning. MY TAKE Quantum computing won’t break crypto tomorrow, but upgrading live networks takes years. Winners will prove security, practical migration and performance without sacrificing decentralization. Post-quantum cryptography may be quiet today, but decisions now could shape which networks are ready for the next generation.
2
8
29
410
Quaverick retweeted
Top Quantum-Resistant picks you should definitely check out 👀 💎 $QRL 💎 ( @QRLedger ) 💎 $QANX 💎 ( @QANplatform ) 💎 $QUBIC 💎 ( @_Qubic_ ) 💎 $NAORIS 💎 ( @NaoXprotocol ) 💎 $QTC 💎 ( @QuantusNetwork ) Which ones are on your radar?
43
44
6
222
9,140
$QRL for crypto ☝️
QUANTUM EARNINGS START THURSDAY. HERE’S EVERYTHING TO KNOW: $IONQ Nov 5: About $141M in revenue expected. It’s also the first report since DARPA moved IonQ into the final stage of its quantum benchmarking program. $QNT, Nov 5: $28–32M guided for 2026. Helios just hit near 99.999% logical fidelity. Watch for updates on Sol, its next system, due in 2027. $IQMX, Nov 5: €42–47M guided, mostly in Q4. Its first 150-qubit system decides whether it gets there. $PSQL, Nov 6: A business update. It just reached 1,024 atoms, watch how fast it turns them into usable qubits. $QUBT, Nov 9: About $7.6M expected. Watch its second chip fab, the core of its photonic foundry plan. $QBTS, Nov 10: About $4.4M expected, with most of 2026’s revenue due in Q4. Its 17-qubit gate-model system is due by year-end. $RGTI, Nov 10: About $3.7M expected. Its 108-qubit system is chasing 99.5% two-qubit fidelity, up from 99.1% in Q2. $HQ, Nov 10: Zero revenue last quarter. Watch its Beryllium programming language and the 256-qubit system planned for Dublin. $XNDU, Nov 11: $1.5M last quarter. It promised engineering guidance later this year, and this report is the likely moment. $INFQ, Nov 16: About $43M guided for 2026. It already showed 30 entangled logical qubits in September. Watch what comes next, and whether its $100M CHIPS Act deal gets finalized. Revenue tells you about today. The tech tells you who’s still standing in 2030. $INFQ $IONQ $QBTS
1
4
1
21
696
🚨Binance Hacked: The Biggest Crypto Heist in History? | Crypto Roadmaps, Quantum, & Coffee We're going live in 10 minutes (at Noon ET/16:00 UTC) to discuss what's unfolding. Join us for the latest Official QRL Show Live as we dive into the Binance Hack, the evolving cryptographic landscape, AI vs Cryptography, and what it all means for the future of digital asset security. Joining @Strike_Attack & Ryan for the discussion is post-quantum cryptography expert, Dr. Joseph Kearney (@Joseph_Kearney). 🗓️ October 30th | Noon ET (16:00 UTC) 📍 QRL YouTube & X Livestream Join us 👇 youtube.com/live/vBvL7Gd9Yyc…
11
1
31
1,909
🚨 We are receiving reports of hot wallets on BTCPay Servers being swept by unauthorized attackers. If you're running an instance, please shut it down (./btcpay-down.sh) until we complete the investigation.
279
1,103
456
3,169
891,909
Quaverick retweeted
Here are the key crypto categories and projects worth knowing 👇 🟢 Quantum Resistant $QRL $CKB $QANX $NAORIS $QTC 🔵 Layer 1 $SOL $ICP $KAS $SUI $ALGO $INJ $SEI $APT $PROS $KTA 🔴 RWA $ONDO $CFG $ZBCN $SYRUP $RE $PLUME $PENDLE $PROPS $EDEN $CPOOL 🟩 Robinhood Ecosystem $PONS $ORBIO $EDEL $STANDARD $TORCH $DELTA $SFI $STATICS $PRIORS $PRISM 🟠 AI $TAO $QUBIC $AKT $SENT $FET $VIRTUAL $VVV $DATA $TRAC $KITE 🟡 Privacy $XMR $ZEC $ZANO $ARX $ANYONE Bookmark this for reference 🔖 NFA, DYOR
12
17
4
144
6,784
Record exchange hack. Hawkish Fed. Red month for almost everything. $QRL +92%. The market is starting to price the one risk no exchange can ever cover: quantum. Post-quantum since genesis.
UPTOBER NEVER SHOWED UP Binance’s record hack and a hawkish Fed erased September’s rally Top Gainer : $[TICKER] +160% Key Price Moves 💰 $QRL ↑92% $HONEY ↑33% $CARDS ↑22% $PONS ↓56% $SEI ↓33% Key Fundamental Updates 🔍 $GEOD $ZEC $LIT $INJ $FIL $AERO $PUMP Market Snapshot 📊 Stablecoin Cap : $296B Altcoin Dominance : 41% Fear and Greed : 33 What happened in October? 👉 Uptober failed, with roughly $300B wiped from the market and BTC sliding from about $87K to $77K, its second red October in a row. 👉 Binance suffered a roughly $6.3B hack around October 29, the largest crypto theft on record, with attackers draining hot wallets across about 10 chains. 👉 Around $3B of the stolen funds was frozen on-chain, and Binance pledged to cover all losses from its reserves. 👉 The Fed held rates at 3.75-4.00% on October 28 in a 10-2 vote, with both dissenters wanting a hike, and December hike odds rose to about 80%. 👉 PCE inflation printed 3.6% headline and 3.1% core, keeping higher-for-longer rate expectations in place. 👉 Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a $485M outflow on October 7, their largest since June, and another day above $635M on October 23. 👉 ETH fell roughly 17-22% and SOL roughly 19-26%, both worse than Bitcoin, while altcoins broadly lagged. 👉 HYPE held up as a relative outperformer, and Zcash and Monero posted weekly gains while most of the market bled. 👉 OCC finalized its GENIUS Act rules for payment stablecoins on October 21, effective January 18, 2027. 👉 SEC comments on the proposed Regulation Crypto Assets closed October 20, while the CLARITY Act stayed stalled in the Senate. 👉 Chainlink launched 24/7 pricing for tokenized stocks, commodities and RWAs, and Samsung added USDC transfers on Galaxy phones. 👉 Crypto groups spent about $176M on the midterms ahead of the November 3 vote, which could unstick the market structure bill.
2
7
25
679
$450M OF BITCOIN IS GETTING SOLD, QUANTUM IS WHY. Nasdaq-listed Next Technology approved selling or pledging all 5,833 BTC, citing the $6.3B Binance hack and quantum risk to Bitcoin’s encryption. The hack was tied to North Korea. The quantum fear is about what's coming next.
SATOSHI'S BITCOIN IS DOOMED UNLESS HE COMES BACK ONLINE. Not all bitcoin is equally exposed to quantum. Modern addresses hide the public key until you spend, so your coins are safe until they move. Satoshi's coins weren't made that way, the earliest bitcoin used a format where the public key sits exposed on the blockchain forever. About 1.1 million BTC, worth almost $100 billion, untouched since 2010, keys visible to anyone. There are exactly two ways to protect a bitcoin from a quantum computer such as never exposing its public key, or move it to a quantum safe address. Satoshi's coins fail the first permanently and the second requires a signature from his private key. Nobody can migrate coins on someone else's behalf. So unless the person holding those keys logs on and moves them, the coins sit exposed until a machine can run Shor's algorithm at scale. Then whoever runs it derives the key and gets access to them as Satoshi. The clock has dates now, with IonQ's blueprint this month stating 20,000 qubits breaks Bitcoin's curve in 26 days, targeted for 2028. $BTC $IONQ $INFQ
18
29
4
64
3,706
A post-quantum wallet that never goes online. Latch, @QRLedger's new offline signer for QRL 2.0, is out as a team preview. Source: theqrl.org/weekly/2026-octob… In plain English: your key stays on a device with no internet. Transactions move to it by QR code or file. You review, then sign. Why it matters: QRL 2.0 signs with ML-DSA-87, NIST's post-quantum signature standard. Source: digitalguards.nl/blog/qrl2-p… That protects against a quantum computer forging signatures from an on-chain public key. It doesn't protect against a hacked laptop. Offline signing covers that gap. Where do your keys sign?
4
9
25
577