Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver) header
Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver) profile picture

Sociologist (patient safety). Accident/disaster analyst. Qualitative researcher. Psychodynamic. Left. Destined to smash this SARS-CoV-2 catastrophe.

Auckland, NZ
Joined August 2014
Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)Photo by Dr Peter Beaver (@PeterJBeaver)
Here's the most recent iteration of my summary of SARS-CoV-2 harms & brief pandemic analysis. I'll continuously update this file. I'm now focusing on other methods, so this is no longer my primary communication effort, but it's a good resource. tinyurl.com/2kh9b8p9
3
8
1
30
2,460
Replying to @DeanEggitt
As a fellow doctor, I find it concerning that we're still having this conversation in late 2026. There are so many pathogens that spread through the air (besides SARS-CoV-2). The relevant consideration is shared air, not whether a space is public or private. I wish doctors showed more commitment to protecting their patients from preventable infections. 1/2
5
95
2
399
3,741
Dr Peter Beaver retweeted
This "study" is dangerous and misleading. Here's why: They compared people who tested positive for COVID early in the pandemic (2020–21) with people who tested negative, then followed both groups for two years. The problem: the people who tested negative didn't stay uninfected. Follow-up ran through Delta and Omicron. The authors themselves report 20% of controls had a positive PCR within two years, and that only counts recorded tests. By Feb 2022, CDC blood surveys estimated ~58% of Americans had been infected. So by year two, they're comparing people infected early with people infected later. Of course the difference shrinks toward zero. That's control group catching up, not long COVID resolving. The obvious check is to compare against similar people in the years before the pandemic. They had the data: everyone in the study needed claims from 2019, and they used four years of prior medical history. They didn't run it. Not sure if this guy is just really stupid, or actively evil.
14
104
7
439
11,703
Appliance repair guy returned. Saw me masked again, and asked again about COVID. Last time I didn't say much. But he was very interested. So I gave him the whole 9 yards ...
18
55
2
644
14,757
We left it there. He’s back next week. This case study of one shows that people can see this pandemic very differently – IF they are given clear explanations, confident answers, and you articulate the sheer fuckery of what’s being done to us.
3
12
173
1,356
“Was it man-made?” This question really matters to some people! “I’ve been unsure, but I think probably.” MacIntyre’s ‘Dark Winter’ discusses how bio-errors, attacks, and cover-ups are common. And circumstantial evidence suggests SARS-2 lab escape.
5
5
103
1,364
“Thank you, you’ve made it so easy, you’ve explained everything to me.” 5 years of community spread & people have received ZERO truthful explanation. Blue collar workers are not researchers. They get their ‘facts’ from social networks, not scientific research.
14
213
1,504
Governments don’t care. That made sense to him too. I explained asymptomatic harm & infection risks: every organ and system, brain, heart, kidneys, immunity … everything. Talked about this for quite some time. He got it. He’d seen it happen.
12
159
1,551
Health authorities lie. That made sense to him. “Is it a cull?” “They wanted everyone back to normal, they didn’t want to spend money on protections like clean air, they don’t care if people are harmed.”
2
12
164
1,735
We were lied to about airborne transmission too. Tedros and “not in the military sense”. Medical institutions have struggled to accept multiple proofs of airborne spread. Handwashing is useless for COVID!
2
14
235
2,523
“They all had the jab.” I explained that serious vaccine injury is extremely rare. Vaccination reduces infection risk & acute severity. But it does not prevent infection & chronic harm! And chronic harm can kill in the medium term. We were lied to ...
4
10
234
2,641
He’d lost 8 cousins’ since the pandemic started (indigenous Māori in Aotearoa have large extended families & elevated morbidity & mortality).
12
259
2,662
Cardiac & Respiratory Foundation implying pandemic has ended. Not discussing impacts of SARS-2 driven immune dysregulation. According to WHO: 30 Jan 2020 Public health emergency 11 March 2020 Pandemic 5 May 2023 Emergency ends, still in a pandemic. otaihangasecondopinion.wpcom…
3
5
10
418
SARS-2 community spread began in NZ with the arrival of omicron in 2022. By 2025 respiratory admissions increased 16% (actual increase 21% but probably adjusted for population increase). C&R Foundation and medical academics failing to see how pandemic may be driving this.
1
4
133
A repairman visited, classic down-to-earth guy. Asked about mine/my partners' masks: "Is covid around?" "It never went away", I said. "Ohhh", he grimaced. Thinks he's never been infected. No knowledge of mild symptoms & asymptomatic harm. People have been utterly deceived.
4
14
98
1,201
Insubordination. Nearly two years post my submission to the Greens requesting pandemic policy, I've written again requesting a radical advance in the timeline for action. God knows I've given them too much evidence. The case is overwhelming. No more delays.
3
5
53
855
Feeling brutal ...
1
2
7
354
I'm doing advocacy with the Greens to get SARS-2 policy written & generate political action. It's almost impossible. Science & proof counts for nothing when our social world is oblivious to it and the illusion of normality has almost everyone frozen into a trance.
31
80
6
477
6,424
Like this guy can quote 250 research papers but I’m not hearing anything from any expert and all my networks are quiet. It’s not happening, right. Go and have a chill pill.
2
1
45
491
And I think that maybe what maintains the inaction more than anything is the silence of almost all trusted relevant experts and institutions.
3
4
1
82
563