G

What is "epistemic asymmetry?"

Does innovation, invention, and real progress come from those who constantly play it safe and live by low-risk scripts, or those who are brave and dare to take risks?

By treating mistakes as a personal or professional deficit, is the resulting subsidization of mediocrity and punishing of risk-taking going to help or hinder solving the bigger problems?

When a series of experiments fail, is that "a ruin," or is it data?

Does the psychological concept of failure help or suppress human potential?

When was the concept of "personal failure" born?

Before humans linked "failure" to a personal reflection of character, what was it attributed to?

Who was the first culture to weaponize the psychological concept we know as "failure," linking it to humiliation?

How much of your worldview and personal ideology is rooted in ideas brought into play by the industrial revolution?

How often do you paralyze yourself with over-analysis?

Do you have no need whatsoever for external applause?

Do you create more than you consume?

On average in the consumerist, materialist, capitalist system we live in, what do you think is the average % that the average person has reached perfect self-actualization?

Can you reach real self-actualization without "getting your hands dirty?"

Is the peak of your self-actualization a "fixed forever" state, or is it like physical fitness, dynamic and must be actively maintained via daily habits?

Can someone truly become 100% of "themselves" if they follow any scripts from others?

How well have you done at evading and escaping societal scripts?

Are you truly present in and live fully in "the now?"

How much of your person is purely self-authored?

Do you realize that how we are immediately judged by others is based on snap cognitive shortcuts, behavioral cues and... the kicker... their own personal insecurities?

Do we use their "hobbies" as how we identify others, or do we mostly categorize people by what they do for work?