Candace Owens

Today marks one year. To my friend Charlie Kirk. Join us LIVE: youtube.com/live/S07n8TnRT0Q

🙌🙌 Also what exactly does Macron’s lawyer mean when he says they would consider “other ways” to hold me personally accountable despite the ruling. Your client is the sitting President of a foreign country that is currently on fire. He should maybe reflect and consider ways to be personally responsible to his countrymen. nytimes.com/2026/10/27/busin…

I am in the absolute best mood over this Macron dismissal. Feels like a year and a half of my family having to deal with psychotic lies regarding pending bankruptcies, secret accounts and plans to flee the country, has finally come to end. For those of you wondering what happens now with the case, here is a synopsis: You will note the Macrons additionally named two other business entities in their lawsuit: Candace Owens LLC and GeorgeTom Inc. They admitted in our hearing that they were unsure if one or both of these entities housed the podcast and that they would need limited discovery to determine how those businesses run and who runs them. As it turns out, one of the above mentioned entities has absolutely nothing to do with the podcast in any way, shape, or form, so it will be a legal exercise in futility for the couple. In effect, that leaves just one entity. In addition to my personal dismissal, the court also decided in favor of our argument that France’s defamation law should apply. Let me explain to you why that decision deeply impacts matters and was a major point of legal contention; France’s defamation law has a statute of limitation of just 3 months. This means defamation claims time out very quickly. We argued the Macron couple was intentionally forum shopping because being held to France’s 3 months would have naturally expired their claims. We included a briefing from a French legal expert explaining French defamation law. The Macrons did not submit a briefing to counter our arguments, but during oral arguments they suggested that France has a unique statutory law that could, in theory, extend claims up to one year IF the defamation claim pertains to an individual’s sexual orientation or gender. Before ruling on the dismissal pertaining to the remaining entities, the judge is allowing for the Macron couple to submit a supplemental brief, arguing why they believe this case could meet that threshold In his response (see below), the Judge has duly noted our legal expert’s notation that in parallel cases filed by the Presidential couple against other journalists in France, the couple sued under France’s 3 month defamation rule—not the one year statutory. I believe it is worth again noting that the couple is NOT and has never sued anyone for matters pertaining to sex, sexual orientation, or gender (despite intentional media misrepresentations), but rather for defamation related to claims regarding MK Ultra and theft. You are free to read their initial filing against me yourself. So what happens now is the remaining entities and the Macrons submit additional briefings regarding French law and statutes. The judge will then rule on the lingering dismissals.

🚨BREAKING NEWS: I was just personally dismissed from the Macron lawsuit filed against me in Delaware. This case represents one of the grossest, legal overreaches by a foreign government leader in human history—a sitting President’s attempt to personally bankrupt a single podcaster from outside the nation in which he governs. And to formally reiterate since many reporters willfully lied about this most important detail: I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male. I was instead being sued for discussing MK Ultra and for allegedly accusing the “First Lady” of theft from her sister. I am tremendously grateful to the Delaware courts and to the presiding Judge for looking at this case objectively, despite false media depictions and government pressures.

I’m going to deport her as soon as I get home. I told nanny #5 several times she has to chill with the español. Now look what she’s done. 😩 youtu.be/BXkFQjO6k7Q?is=ss3t…

This was actually a fantastic answer. Don’t care what your opinion is regarding James Fishback. The majority of America feels this way about the Charlie Kirk assassination despite the DOD’s best attempts to Operation -Mockingbird the public.

For the record, I never authored even one opinion piece for the Daily Wire. You guys ghostwrote all of them and then slapped my name on it as the author for clicks. Good luck finding the intern (or AI system?) you’re upset with. @CommunityNotes

Sorry for the late reply. Please note my husband protected me and our children from running afoul of immigration law by filing his paperwork appropriately. He was able to make time to do so by resisting the urge to *repeatedly* and spinelessly attack women via social media who have done nothing to him. Handle your affairs at home before you concern yourself with the households of others. 🙏🇬🇭

I never let go of the Egyptian planes. Always knew they were a piece of the Charlie Kirk assasination. They completely overreacted when I mentioned them and Erika made such an awkward joke about them at AmFest when she should have been naturally concerned about them. Plus Joe Kent was blocked from looking into them. Never once doubted they were/are a major piece of the puzzle.

280 community notes from just ONE person. Just incredible. Every day people wake up and just fictionalize narratives about me. I work for Russia, I work for the Vatican, I work for Israel, I’m funded by Qatar, I’m getting a divorce, I’m a lesbian, I was in love with Charlie, I secretly hated Charlie, I have a mansion that houses my illegal 8 nannies, my husband is Mi6, I’m reading ads for the Mossad, I’m hiding money in secret LLCs for fear of bankruptcy. I plan to flee to Russia. I’m Time’s Most Vile Person of the year. Like what actually is there left to make up about my life. Where do we go from here? I want you guys to think carefully about this while I’m on maternity leave because I think I’ve made it clear that I AM NOT LETTING THE DEEP STATE, PUBLIC ASSASINATION OF CHARLES JAMES KIRK GO. He was an innocent young man who didn’t deserve the betrayal and death sentence he received. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

I have not deleted a single post. Again, your pithy research is wrong. If it needs reminding, I made one public and TRUE statement on X that I was not prohibited from speaking about any topic on Shawn Ryan’s show— including Peter Thiel, who we discussed. My episode aired the week before you went on his show. I made no further public comment nor would I have ever addressed you publicly had you not decided to publicly drag me, question a simply ad read, and refer to me as a shill because you could not comprehend the *private* feedback I gave you on the substack you shared with me. You should be calling NO ONE a shill. Your entire background is manufactured (contract work for the NSA and CIA, finance and accounting and now a tech expert but never heard of a liability clause or the petrodollar? K.) It is obvious that you are producing AI-generated substacks based on publicly available information. Nothing you present is new or breaking and for those of us who have spent an entire year working on just ONE story, watching you pop in as a chaos agent to sow unnecessary drama is an annoying deviation. I’m responding to you because you are now annoying me. You are not a victim of some deep state attack because you managed to google “who owns flock” and had a bad interview with someone who saw through your bullshit. As a bonus, here is the full context of our correspondence which you read aloud at 3am in the morning in a random x space. This is the correspondence that led to your determination that I was a shill. I apologize for not writing you a 2am dissertation on why your article made no sense. Will state again you are FREE to publish the entire conversation because I have nothing to hide.

We did good.