The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred) header
The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred) profile picture

The REAL Social Credit is Douglas Social Credit. It is the very opposite of the CCP faux social credit'. It is the antidote to the NWO.

Joined December 2022
Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)Photo by The REAL Social Credit (@RealSocred)
Joshua Haldeman, Elon Musk's Canadian grandfather, once gave an address over the CBC in 1948 entitled "Social Credit vs. Communism" where he argued that "Social Credit offers the only practical solution for opposing communism." That remains true today. socred.org/s-c-action/social…
23
63
18
171
51,492
Replying to @JM1867GHOST
I will check, but I'm not sure whether I can find the original. Are you thinking what I'm thinking? It might be one of these, lol.
1
7
Altruism is a possible attribute of individuals, but never is it an attribute of groups, mobs, collectives, etc.
3
9
284
Replying to @PaulPlamondon
Boring ... try another soap opera act.
9
Replying to @DominionSoc
This is a fake debate .... scripted, scripted, scripted. So tiresome. They have to create a buzz to advance the globalist agenda.
2
152
Replying to @FringeViews
I think Carney and Plamondon are on the same side ultimately. The powers-that-be love to create these conflicts between two arms of the same beast in order to generate conflict. That buzz provides the energy, the power, the social/political attention to advance an agenda through the backdoor while being ostensibly opposed to it, and agenda which I believe they share: the eventual break-up of Canada and its absorption in a globalist North American Union. nitter.cf/SemperVeritasX/status/…
It is nothing short of tragic how susceptible we are, en masse, to manipulation. There was a time when I believed that becoming the 51st state was Canada’s best option. I thought then that Trump was standing against international finance, globalization and the powers that be. I was wrong. It is becoming increasingly clear, to those paying attention, that we are being herded toward centralized control. Trump did not drain the swamp; he is soaking in it. Much of what was MAGA has realized this, however there is a large group of Canadians that now believe Trump is our savior. Wake up, people. Carney and Trump both represent oligarchical interests, not their constituents.
2
18
It's deliberate sabotage on all levels. The answers to all these problems have been in he public domain for more than a century but have been systematically suppressed: nitter.cf/SemperVeritasX/status/…
Central banking parasite Mark Carney has just announced his plans to increase immigration into Canada. Despite, the electorate being VERY opposed. I hear many organizations being critical of mass migration, oddly enough though, not one of these groups focus on the primary causational factor.
10
Replying to @WiretapMediaHQ
There is no debate here ... this is just to create a buzz so energy can be generated in order to advance a shared agenda. @MrCanuckle
1
63
Have you noticed that, no matter who is elected, nothing really substantial ever changes? That's by design. youtube.com/watch?v=Ghh-U0dC…
2
12
111
The REAL Social Credit retweeted
How are we doing this again?? My God! "TRUDEAU MUST GO!!!" Notice how the problems didn't go away? Notice how they got worse? Justin Trudeau was never the source of the problems! Notice how Canada's problems are identical to the problems in every other western nation? Neither Mark Carney, nor the Liberal Party, are the source of the problems. It's not enough to want Carney gone; not when he'll just be replaced. We can't keep doing this. We NEED to be talking about THE SOURCE of the problems!
IT STARTS AS A THOUGHT. It turns into a whisper. It morphs into a conversation. It becomes a loud statement. IT LEADS TO A RALLY CRY. (Enough is enough of Carney.)
9
15
49
1,050
Control of credit, control of the policy of the money system, is control of the world. The present money system doesn't serve the public optimally. It serves vested interests optimally. youtube.com/watch?v=wXYnUpqs…
1
4
101
Replying to @tlanderso
There is no doubt that the monopoly of credit, Finance, comes out on top under existing financial arrangements. But we don't want engineering experts to be determining the policy of production, only administering the production system for the benefit of the public. Consumers should occupy the commanding heights of the economy.
15
Replying to @tlanderso
The provision of banking services also involve work, expertise, training etc., and they should be duly recompensed for that, but without any opportunity to engage in rent-taking. DSC eliminates the rent-taking as a by-product of its remedial measures: youtube.com/watch?v=wXYnUpqs…
4
Replying to @tlanderso
There is no way of determining the trading of "equivalents" except perhaps in some roughly proportionate way in terms of the contribution each person is making to production and how much training, responsibility, effort is involved in that ... but, as I said, the economy isn't about trading between individuals anyway.
4
Replying to @tlanderso
Production in the modern economy is not a matter of exchanging between individuals though. Production is pooled, involving large organizations and multiple stages involving various firms. We need money to make claims on that central pool. You'll want to read C.H. Douglas' "Money and the Price System" in detail, but here are the most relevant sections: "Money now as a Means of Distribution "The classical economics works on the assumption that the nature of money is that it is a medium of exchange. That idea proceeds from a state of affairs which was, at any rate broadly speaking, true perhaps 200 years ago. It was the assumption that in some sense or other, from the highest to the lowest, everybody worked, and that they exchanged or bartered the fruits of their work with each other through the medium of money, so far as it was used. The idea was that you had a constant exchange of goods and services between, let us say, A, B and C; and the whole of the classical economics is really based upon that idea, that we are all of us producers and consumers in the economic sense, and that the function of money is to exchange between ourselves the goods and services which each of us produces. "Whatever may at one time have been the truth of this, it is, of course, patently not true now. The modern economic production system is not a system of individual production and exchange of production between individuals. It is more and more the synthetic assembly, in a central pool, of wealth consisting of goods and services which are preponderantly due to the use of power, to modern scientific processes and all sorts of organisations and other constituent contributions of each one of us which will occur to you. 4 "The problem is not to exchange the constituent contributions of each one of us to that central pool, because in fact our contribution to that central pool, in the ordinary sense of tangible economic things, is becoming smaller and smaller. "The correct picture—the incontestably exact picture of the modern production system—is, to my mind, based upon a kind of typewriter with a decreasing number of operators who are tapping the keys, and, by tapping these keys, fewer and fewer operators can produce all that we require. Through the power of the sun (oil power, steam power and so forth consist of what is generalised as solar energy) the so-called curse of Adam is being transferred from the backs of men to machines, so that a small number of persons operating on this machine of industrial "production", can produce all that is required for the use of the population; and the problem is not to exchange between the number of the population, who are less and less required to push these keys, but it is to draw from this central pool of wealth by means of what can be visualised as a ticket system. And the modern money system is in fact losing almost daily its aspect, however much it may at one time have been true, of a medium of exchange, and becoming more and more a ticket system by which people, who are not exchanging their production, can draw from that central pool of wealth. That I believe at bottom to be the fundamental cleavage between, let us say, my own view and those who think with me, and the school of classical economics." alor.org/Storage/Library/PDF…
1
15
Whatever one makes of the argument, the police should not be wasting resources investigating "hurty words".
🤖 Made with AI
Police in London, Ontario are investigating this incident as a hate crime for some reason. 🤷
1
1
2
88
Replying to @bruce_barrett
The police should not be wasting resources investigating "hurty words".
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
1
9
670
The problem with our money system is not the blunt fact that the banks create money out of nothing in the form of credit, but that they hold a monopoly on this power under a cost accountancy system that generates costs and prices faster than it distributes incomes. When you fill the gap with more and more debt-money the total level of societal debt must rise, with all the fallout which that entails (economic & social instability, cost-push inflation, periodic financial crises, etc.) youtube.com/watch?v=-x2r64tZ…
1
3
10
322