Pinned Tweet
Decided to make a pinned post with my YouTube channel, just so people know I'm also cringe on YouTube!
1
4
1,491
I should be doing video editing but instead I'm gonna give you an insight into my messed mind
So here's a thread on why I'm against Red-Eyes ever getting support, unless it's a full on remake that completely erases any relationship with previous cards
🧵(1/?)
15
67
🧵(15/?)Also instead of a fancy mausoleum temple she lives in a volcano because she's fucking homeless
I live for my dream of failgirl Red-Eyes priestess, Konami make her real
14
🧵(14/?)Making a "Maiden with Eyes of Red" that's in direct confrontation with the "Eyes of Blue" religion would be a cool way of remaking Red-Eyes
Instead of having Red-Eyes have an entire group dedicated to worshiping them, she's just a singular Priestess
Or she's the last one
13
🧵(13/?) "But Red-Eyes Gal, what would YOU like to see as a Red-Eyes remake? you are so pretty and smart"
woah, thanks
And honestly? I think we should get Red-Eyes lore support similar to those of Blue-Eyes but making them distinct enough lore wise so it's not just copy paste
1
18
🧵(12/?)I'm running out of things to say, uuuuh, if you ever wanted Red-Eyes Ultimate Dragon then you are lame
This is the worst thing you could ever wish for Red-Eyes and I'll judge you for it
🧵(11/?)Honestly, if they just were to make a Max Metalmorph retrain of Darkness Metal it'd be really cool
Give this guy a chance
10
🧵(10/?) if we are cursed to get new Red-Eyes cards that try to tie these awful cards together, I am hopeful that they'll stop trying to milk Jonouchi and try to remake some of Darkness/Fubuki cards instead
Darkness Dragon still looks really cool and it deserves a new retrain
1
14
🧵(9/?) If we get a new Red-Eyes card in the next few years, I'm hoping it's something that does not support any Red-Eyes cards but instead something that connects Metalmorph and DTW together because these are actually good Red-Eyes cards that makes it feel like a proper Boss
17
🧵(8/?) I'm glad DTW exists as a Jonouchi reference because I hate these guys
The whole "turn iconic Jonouchi cards into Red-Eyes" was an awful trend I'm hoping it never repeats thanks to the fact that DTW does it better and in a less insulting way
13
🧵(7/?) To continue on why Red-Eyes should never get support as it is
It's because of the fucking Gemini
Every time someone mentions "this could've supported the Red-Eyes playstyle" I'm left baffled, what playstyle? Summoning the stupid ass Gemini monster? Do bad burn damage?
1
17
🧵(6/?)I have NO IDEA why Effect Damage is so tied to Red-Eyes (even in Jonouchi support) considering that the only time he actually uses effect damage is when he's being MIND CONTROLLED BY MARIK INTO USING AN ILLEGAL DECK
WHY ARE YOU MAKING THE RED-EYES GIMMICK THIS? IT'S DUMB
1
11
🧵(5/?) Now we do a little of a side tracking into me ranting about Inferno Fire Blast
Because of the way Red-Eyes Fusion naming effect works, any future support needs to be made in consideration of this bitch ass card that could enable some of the most stupid and easy FTKs ever
9
🧵(4/?) Another Red-Eyes fusion issue is the whole "treated as Red-Eyes Black Dragon" thing which causes more problems for future support
For example, two of the fusion Dragons do not have Red-Eyes in the name so any future 'support' would need to accommodate to this naming issue
11
🧵(3/?) Now that that's out of the way, Red-Eyes fusion cannot keep being the only way the deck can Fusion
If we were to get Red-Eyes support they'd end up with the same issue as Meteor Dragon had
Where instead of allowing you to freely fusion you get chained to this failure
1
13
🧵(2/?)First thing first, let's address the elephant in the room.
Fuck this guy
New Red-Eyes support should ideally include a way of fusion summoning
The issue is that it needs to be full of restrictions in order not to make Dragoon an even MORE generic staple negate, thanks DM
1
32




































