Jerry Coyne and Douglas Futuyma are right. The Neo-Darwinian Synthesis grows in strength and stature as more and more data arrive to fill in the details. Cries for a major revolution are a vanity trip..
whyevolutionistrue.com/2026/…
New research shows that 80 million Americans are afraid to express religious doubts. The documentary HEATHENS follows five of them when they stopped pretending, paid the price of truth, and rebuilt free, joyful lives. I found the film moving, even shocking.Catch an upcoming screening in SF, LA or NY. With US mid-terms coming up, it's a good time to examine beliefs and values.heathens.movie
Richard Dawkins retweeted
Read about the upcoming world premier of my @HeathensDoc film by #UNAFF at 315pm Oct 27 Mitchell Park Palo Alto followed by a filmmakers panel. I hope to see you there!!
almanacnews.com/ae/features/…
Richard Dawkins retweeted
Discover the extraordinary in the natural world with Richard Dawkins’s 42 TALES FROM LIFE. 🪸
Such presidential gravitas in his carefully considered choice of top personnel.
What’s next, Barbie Doll for Supreme Court?
The glorious spectacle of Timothy Miller wearing a burka
spectator.com/article/the-gl…
Brendan O'Neill, Spectator 16th Oct
Crack open the warm bitter. Dust down the bunting. Put Elgar’s ‘Nimrod’ on repeat. For at last we have something to make every true English heart swell with pride. It’s the stirring sight of that 76-year-old geezer who was arrested for wearing a burka attending court yesterday in… a burka. Oh, this blessed plot!
His name is Timothy Miller. He’s from Southampton. On 12 September he was arrested at an anti-immigration protest for parading about in an entombing niqab. The cops accused him of using the Islamic veil to conceal his identity. Not so, he replied: I really am an ageing student of Allah.
He repeated this defence at Portsmouth magistrates’ court yesterday. He lifted his veil – I’m cracking up – to confirm his name, address and date of birth. He then said he is ‘studying’ Islam and he wears the burqa to gain a ‘greater understanding’ of the faith. His draping veil was flawlessly accessorised with a fetching black handbag. . .
The sourpusses of the Islamo-left will wail ‘Islamophobia!’. They’ll accuse him of ridiculing Islamic dress. But the burqa is ridiculous. We didn’t need a pensioner from Southampton to tell us that. It is cruel, brutish, backward, sexist and profoundly anti-social to make women drape themselves in public like this. If you’re alarmed when a white male pensioner pulls on a sackcloth but cool when a brown-skinned woman is forced to do so, you might want to have a word with yourself.
It’s possible this case will force some serious head-scratching in public life. Like, why is it potentially a crime for a British pensioner to cover his face but fine for a Muslim woman? Is it because she believes Muhammad flew to heaven on a winged horse and that women must wholly surrender the self to divine decree? If I embrace such truthless dogmas, can I also wear a mask on the street? . . .
Richard Dawkins retweeted
I applaud @ComAcFreedom for commissioning a genuinely independent investigation into Cambridge’s appointment of Jason Arday and the university’s subsequent handling of concerns about his scholarship, qualifications, and the direction of its own inquiry.
Cambridge’s process appears to have been narrowed away from the core questions of academic merit, due diligence, and the possible role of EDI considerations. That is precisely why an external review is needed.
The panel’s calibre is exceptional. Particular credit to @ProfAliceS (UCL), whose rigorous work on sex-based data and evidence has itself been a stand against ideology over reality. She is joined by @sapinker, Robert Tombs, Maurice Glasman, and chair Swaran Preet Singh (Lord Singh of Solihull), with @nickwallis, whose reporting exposed the Post Office scandal, leading the evidence-gathering. This is a serious highly qualified group committed to objective analysis rather than institutional self-protection.
Truth-seeking and clarity matter. @Cambridge_Uni’s reputation has been damaged; only a full, evidence-based examination can help it begin to recover. It also sets a necessary precedent: other universities should not be able to prioritise narrative over standards and then limit scrutiny when questions arise. The involvement of people prepared to defend material reality (including on sex) against ideological pressure is welcome in both this and related fights for academic integrity.
This weekend @acadofideas #BattleFest is taking up these issues directly, with sessions on Saturday including “The corruption of the university?” (Hoare Memorial Hall, 10:15) and “After Arday: is Sociology worth saving?” (Temple Room). I am looking forward to the debates @Fox_Claire.
Universities exist to pursue knowledge, not to manage reputations or enforce DEI, ideology or orthodoxy. Engaging in debate about it and an independent investigation are welcome steps toward restoring that principle.
🚨BREAKING: CAF has commissioned an independent investigation into Cambridge’s appointment of Dr Jason Arday as its youngest ever black professor, amid growing professional disquiet over his academic record, the circumstances of his appointment, the University’s handling of concerns raised about his scholarship and, more recently, the scope and direction of Cambridge’s own inquiry.
You can find out more here:
ardayinvestigation.net/
The investigation will be chaired by Professor Swaran Preet Singh, Lord Singh of Solihull, a former Commissioner of the Equality and Human Rights Commission who previously led the independent investigation into allegations of discrimination within the Conservative Party.
He will be joined by a distinguished panel comprising Harvard psychologist Professor Steven Pinker, UCL sociologist Professor Alice Sullivan, Cambridge historian Professor Robert Tombs and Labour peer Professor Maurice Glasman.
Award-winning investigative journalist Nick Wallis, whose work helped expose the Post Office Horizon scandal, will lead the investigation with a dedicated research team.
CAF has been contacted by numerous Cambridge academics who are deeply concerned that the University’s own investigation will fail to confront the wider institutional culture in which the Arday affair unfolded.
Whether these concerns are justified is for the independent investigation to determine. But Cambridge is one of the world’s oldest and greatest universities, and what happens to its academic culture has implications for higher education as a whole. So we think it’s worth going the extra mile to make sure the right questions are asked and the right lessons learned.
CAF strongly encourages current and former academics, students and other members of the University community, as well as others with relevant knowledge, to come forward with information.
This might include policy documents, internal correspondence or first-hand accounts concerning Arday’s academic record and appointment, the University’s response to concerns about his scholarship and its treatment of those who raised them, and the operation of institutional policies relating to recruitment, promotion, academic misconduct, research integrity and EDI.
Anyone wishing to contribute can contact the Investigator directly at:
[email protected]
The investigation website provides further guidance on submitting information, including arrangements for particularly sensitive material:
ardayinvestigation.net/
"Academics launch rival inquiry
Committee for Academic Freedom will examine [whether Jason Arday’s] employment at Cambridge met expected standards" (Times)
I’ll submit my own assessment of Arday's illiterate thesis. It failed to meet expected standards for PhD, let alone a Cambridge professorship.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States. So dignified. So presidential. Such a credit to his country.
Trump posts AI video of himself wrestling Yorkshire tiger that killed a man
In a free country, you are entitled to believe you are a woman with a penis. But not to take it into a female changing room, nor to cheat your way into a female athletic competition, nor in any way to impose your private delusion on the rest of us.
theguardian.com/politics/202…
The real reason children no longer enjoy reading.” Mary Wakefield has a theory in the latest Spectator. Instead of screen addiction, she blames school curricula which teach “to the test” rather than reading for enjoyment. Children are so busy analysing brief extracts, they can’t enjoy the book as a whole.
I read incessantly as a child, including illicitly when I was supposed to be sleeping. Not “great literature”, it was Dr Dolittle, Biggles, Bulldog Drummond, Just William, Arthur Ransome, Percy F Westerman. It would certainly have included Harry Potter if he’d been around then. I don’t believe I ever had my “comprehension” tested. I just loved reading.
Is Mary Wakefield right?
"Please raise your right hand. I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States. That loves us so much he can’t even breathe. That I will go out with my family, my friends, I’ll do it any way — I don’t care if I’m registered or not, I’m going to try to cheat like hell like they do."
Donald Trump appealing for mid-term votes.
How often is the author of a book still around to witness its 50th anniversary edition? The Selfish Gene is 50. I’ll be coming to America’s two great cultural landmarks, Chicago’s Symphony Center and New York’s Carnegie Hall, to speak about it. Two nights only.
Tickets:
Chicago, 18 Oct: howtoacademy.com/north-ameri…
New York, 20 Oct: howtoacademy.com/north-ameri…
@WBEZ @howtoacademy











