Indians smell like shit

Normies are retarded. They don't know where their beliefs come from. They just hear things and repeat them. But they also choose who they listen to. That's why they are responsible for the way they are. Modern normies don't listen to their families. They don't listen to their fathers, their traditions, the people who made them the way they are. They listen to the cool kids on tv. They might be unconscious morons that only believe things approved by their social structures, but they do choose their social structures. They could honor their mothers and fathers, their histories, their nations. But they don't. They honor degenerate media and obviously dysfunctional schoolteachers and shit like that instead. Every single thing that happens is [what you do] x [what you got]. Normies got a choice of who to listen to. Most of them listen to the devil.

No I'm pretty sure people have a pretty good idea about how deadly WAR is Anyway, note the electrical taped barrel. I've heard that it's done to identify friendlies in your trench so you don't smoke your buddy as he comes around the corner. Unsure if true. Also a whole lotta armchair generals in the comments.

We need reeducation camps but for farmers

Russians don't smile because, living off of 300$ a month in most rural places, they are poorer than blacks in Africa. Russians are third-world Whites, but they don't receive the same development aid. They don't smile because they feel low status. They feel devalued. And that's why I think they will win the war with the West. Because they haven't got anything to lose.

Because Tsawwassen (hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓) is an Indigenous language, standard digital tools like Google Translate do not support it. For official, cultural, or community documents, you need to work with dedicated organizations like NATIONS Indigenous Language Translators or Languages in Motion. It's a great gig, and no one can check your work for accuracy.

Usually I am with the farmers, having grown up around them, however this is bullshit and they should not stand in the way of progress

"Communism is nice in theory, but--" No, it's also evil in theory.

Honestly thinking about becoming blackpilled, what are some good blackpills to start with?

We’re all in the FDJ.

If we want to know what will happen to Britain’s cities when the British population is a minority and the cities are flooded with African and Muslim immigrants, a good lesson is the city of Detroit in Michigan, USA. In 1966, Detroit was one of the wealthiest and most economically powerful cities not just in the USA but the whole world. Back then, the GDP of cities wasn’t recorded, but the GDP of Michigan was $39.26 billion, the vast share of it coming from Detroit, which was 5% of the US GDP of $813.4 billion. Because of strong unionisation, that wealth was shared, and Detroit had the highest per-capita income of any major city in the United States, with a factory worker in the automobile industry making enough money to purchase a house, buy several cars and send their children to college. In 1966, the population of Detroit was around 1.6 million, of which 33% were Black. The following year, 1967, the Blacks in Detroit, living in the wealthiest city per capita in the USA, decided to riot. In a mere five days, 43 people were killed, 1,189 were injured, over 7,200 were arrested, around 2,500 stores and businesses were looted or damaged, and nearly 700 buildings were destroyed by fires. The officially estimate of the financial cost of the Black riot was $40-45 million at the time, or about $287 million to $323 million adjusted for inflation. The most immediate result of the riot was White flight from the city to the suburbs, followed, inevitably, by the slow death of the automobile industry in Detroit and the withdrawal of investment in the city. Between 1970 and 1980 alone, Detroit lost roughly 310,000 residents, almost all of them White, while the Blacks stayed in the ruin they had created with their adolescent, violent and criminal behaviour. By the time of the 2020 Census, the population of Detroit was down to 639,111, nearly a third of what it was before the riots. 80.38% of the population is now Black, two-and-a-half-times what is was in 1966, about 514,000 residents, marginally down from 528,000. And with all the White people gone, the GDP of Detroit is now $276.5 billion, 0.85% of the GDP of the USA, a sixth of what it was before the riots. You see the same behaviour in housing estates or neighbourhoods in the UK and across the USA. Uniquely among the peoples of the world, Blacks destroy their own surroundings. When they riot, it is their own neighbourhoods and cities that they destroy. When not rioting, it is their streets that they turn into rubbish dumps, their housing blocks they turn into broken drug dens of abandoned women and their ferral kids. Left to themselves, Blacks, without exception, revert back to what they are, an uncivilised, violent and low-IQ people living in a world they do not understand and cannot adjust to, and which, again without exception, they turn into a hell for themselves and everyone who is forced to live among them. I visited Detroit several times in 2002, and it’s a ghost town. The centre looks like one of those Hollywood movies from the 1950s in which a secret nerve gas has been dropped on the population. The famous Woodward Avenue, the main strip and once the city’s commercial hub, is lined with Black prostitutes and their Black pimps, which is one of the few industries in which Blacks thrive. White people from the suburbs and wealthy surrounding towns simply do not go there. The entire city is a no-go zone except for those trying to score drugs, another industry in which Blacks thrive in every city in the world in which they live. London, Birmingham and Manchester all have large Black populations, and are all cities in which the White British are now minorities. When the Blacks riot, which they will because that’s what Blacks always do, the current steady White flight from our cities will become a flood, and our burned-out cities will collapse just like Detroit. There is no city in the Western world, whether Baltimore, Paris or London, in which the Black population reaches a critical mass that does not degenerate into rioting, street crime and gang warfare. We can see this on a grander scale in African countries like South Africa, Zimbabwe, Angola, Somalia, Sudan, Uganda, Nigeria (etc.) that were former European colonies and are now under Black governments. Like the street gangs that run drugs and prostitution in Western cities, their governments are all, without exception, a mix of corruption, incompetence, crime and military dictatorships. Without White governments, African countries have collapsing infrastructure, vast debts, mismanaged finances, rising and violent crime and, again, White flight. White people as little want to live in countries run by Africans as we want to live in neighbourhoods of Blacks, because sooner or later every Black neighbourhood will riot. Blacks do not know how to create, how to nurture, how to maintain, how to build. They only know how to destroy: to consume the resources of the country into which they move, and then to destroy it. Africans, whether in Africa or the West, have shown again and again that they cannot govern themselves. Adjusted for inflation, the Western world, which means White tax-payers, has handed $4.7 trillion to Africa since 1960 alone, and yet the place is still a stain on the planet. Sub-Saharan Africa, in which 67% of the world’s poor live today, still has 46% of its population (524.4 million people) living in extreme poverty. Absurdly and obscenely, only 53.6% have access to electricity. The roads, railways, hospitals and other infrastructure we built and left has fallen into ruin for lack of maintenance and hasn’t been replaced. Nowhere else on the planet is run so badly, or is governed by such incompetent and corrupt leaders. What lessons can and must we learn from this? In 1960, seven years before the Detroit riots, colonialism was made illegal under international law, so we are not going to go back into Africa to run their countries the way they were before, when Rhodesia and South Africa were financially flourishing states and Blacks were segregated from Whites. But we can and must learn the lessons of Black History to defend our own neighbourhoods, cities and countries from Black populations. If we don’t want to see London, Birmingham, Manchester and every other city in Britain go the way of Detroit, and our country go the way of South Africa, the Black populations have to be kept down to a very small percentage of the total, not be allowed to form ghettos, and no Black person should every hold any public office in the UK state. As we saw when the most senior Black figures in British life, heads of colleges, lawyers, journalists and politicians, all sided with the lie that Jason Arday was a martyr rather than what he was, another Black criminal, Blacks place allegiance to other Blacks, no matter what their crimes, above law, logic, society, honesty, responsibility, accountability and all the other concepts invented by White people and which Blacks are as incapable of understanding in Britain as they are in Africa, let alone of observing. And yet, in the face of all this evidence, historical and geographical, of the incompatibility of Blacks with a civilised society, successive UK governments are importing millions of Africans into Britain. At the last count, which is already out of date, there are around 675,000 Nigerians, 250,000 Somalis, 200,000 Ghanaians, 200,000 Zimbabweans, 50,000 Sudanese and thousands of other sub-Saharan Africans living, at our expense, in Britain, the vast majority of whom have come here since 2021. In addition, there are also 1.2 million Caribbeans who have been here for longer, but after decades and several generations of living among us still retain, and at every opportunity demonstrate, the pack mentality and disposition for violence and crime of all Africans. The question I get asked more than any other is what is the purpose of importing tens of millions of unskilled, violent and unworking immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia into Britain, when there is absolutely no need and as little capacity for them to be employed in an advanced economy like ours. And the answer is they have been brought here to destroy Britain, just as they did Detroit, just as they have the countries they have been handed to govern by virtuous but flawed ideas about equality not as a principal of law but of biology. Blacks, as they demonstrate every day, are neither equal to nor compatible with us, and if we want to save our countries in Britain, Europe and across the West, all immigration from Africa has to be stopped immediately and permanently and millions — tens of millions — of Blacks have to be deported back to Africa. This, undoubtedly, doesn’t accord with liberal ideas about the lack of any difference between races, the equality between cultures, the White man’s burden of humanitarian aid for third-world countries, the moral imperative of decolonisation and all the other beliefs of White liberals that have brought us to the point where we are about to lose our countries to what is a deliberate and planned invasion; but the alternative is disaster. Detroit is an image of our future.

Heaven forbid they have a little fun

THIS! THIS!! THIS!!! THIS!!!!

Bleak

Asmongold proposes a new rule for anyone who’s been arrested 30+ times

In the late 1800s and early 1900s, bananas were a relatively new import in North America and Europe. Their elongated shape and the act of eating them, especially in public, were considered suggestive by Victorian standards, which emphasized modesty and propriety. This led to bananas being labeled “immoral” or indecent, particularly when consumed by women. To counter this perception and boost sales, fruit companies launched a clever marketing campaign. They produced postcards and advertisements featuring women eating bananas in everyday, wholesome settings. These images were designed to normalize the fruit and detach it from its taboo reputation, reframing bananas as a healthy, family-friendly snack. The campaign worked. Over time, bananas shed their controversial image and became a staple of Western diets. Today, they’re one of the most consumed fruits globally, with little trace of their once-scandalous status. The story serves as a quirky reminder of how cultural norms, and clever advertising, can shape public perception. In the early 1900s, the banana’s risqué reputation wasn’t just tackled by fruit companies, it was embraced by performers. Vaudeville and burlesque acts sometimes incorporated bananas into routines as cheeky props, playing off their suggestive shape and the public’s discomfort. These performances blurred the line between satire and seduction, turning the fruit’s taboo status into a source of spectacle. Some postcards and stage posters from that era featured women in playful poses with bananas, not just to normalize the fruit, but to titillate and tease. While mainstream ads leaned wholesome, fringe entertainment leaned provocative, using the banana as a symbol of rebellion against Victorian prudery. #archaeohistories