Robbservations

The human predicament..... We are all just a bunch of pre-programmed (yet updating in real time) Rockem’ Sockem’ Robots. Born to clash. Bound to battle. There is no way out of the resulting eternal combat. Make the best of it.... Have a nice day!😀

𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢 𝗪𝗔𝗬 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗢𝗥 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗬 𝗢𝗥 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗠 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗦 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗢𝗖𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗢𝗥 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗘! 𝗡𝗢. 𝟭. 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗗 — 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗟𝗬 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗗. • Historical documents can establish that 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗱, 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗱, 𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱. • They cannot automatically establish that those reports accurately describe reality. • 𝗔 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗺𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝘁𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳. 𝗡𝗢. 𝟮. 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗙 𝗢𝗙 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗦. • Ancient eyewitness claims, secondhand accounts, and religious writings are all subject to 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀, 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗺𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. • Even sincere eyewitnesses can misunderstand what they experienced. • 𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛. 𝗡𝗢. 𝟯. 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗟𝗬 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗬 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡. • Historians evaluate evidence using established historical methods. • They can investigate whether an unusual event was reported or whether an underlying event probably occurred. • However, 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗻𝘂𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁. • 𝗔𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗗 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗢𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗔 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘. 𝗡𝗢. 𝟰. 𝗠𝗨𝗟𝗧𝗜𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗦 𝗗𝗢 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗔 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗘. • Multiple sources can strengthen the case that 𝗮 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗶𝗿𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁. • Independent accounts may strengthen the case for an underlying historical event. • But even numerous accounts cannot, by themselves, establish 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡. • 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗘𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠. 𝗡𝗢. 𝟱. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗚𝗢𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗟 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗠𝗣𝗧 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗬. The Gospels contain claims that Jesus: • Walked on water. • Turned water into wine. • Raised people from the dead. • Miraculously healed illnesses. • Was physically resurrected after his death. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗱. Historians can study the development, transmission, and historical context of these traditions without establishing their miraculous explanations as facts. 𝗡𝗢. 𝟲. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗘𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡. Even if historians established that: • Jesus was crucified. • His followers sincerely believed they saw him alive afterward. • His followers proclaimed that he had been resurrected. 𝗡𝗢𝗡𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗦 𝗪𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗, 𝗕𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗠𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗦, 𝗗𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗔 𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗥𝗘𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗡𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗢 𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗘. That conclusion requires additional evidence sufficient to establish the extraordinary event itself. 𝗡𝗢. 𝟳. 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗡 𝗢𝗙 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗙 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗦 𝗪𝗜𝗧𝗛 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗢𝗡 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗔 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗢𝗖𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗗. • 𝗔 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗜𝗧 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘𝗦 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗗. • 𝗔 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠 𝗢𝗙 𝗗𝗜𝗩𝗜𝗡𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗗𝗜𝗩𝗜𝗡𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡. • 𝗔 𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗞 𝗢𝗙 𝗔 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗔 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗘𝗫𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡. Historical evidence must be evaluated, not automatically accepted because a religious tradition considers its writings authoritative. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗣𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗦. 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗜𝗡𝗩𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗚𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗘𝗢𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗠𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗦𝗘 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗦. 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡 𝗦𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗔𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗟𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗢𝗖𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗗. 𝗕𝗨𝗧 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗗𝗢𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗔𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗘 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗙𝗬 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗔 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗢𝗖𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗥𝗘𝗗. This is a limitation of what historical evidence can establish, not a demonstration that every alleged miracle is false. 𝗕𝗢𝗧𝗧𝗢𝗠 𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗘: 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗢𝗙 𝗔 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘 𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗟𝗘! 𝗖𝗛𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗡 𝗔𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗟 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗢 𝗔𝗡 𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗗 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧 𝗦𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗬 𝗕𝗘𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗦𝗘 𝗦𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗕𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗪𝗥𝗢𝗧𝗘 𝗜𝗧 𝗗𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝟮,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗬𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗦 𝗔𝗚𝗢! 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗙 — 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗡 𝗢𝗙 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗢𝗙 𝗛𝗔𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗗!

It is 100% IMPOSSIBLE for anybody to claim they KNOW Jesus is God!" It is 100% IMPOSSIBLE for any Christian to KNOW that ANY of Christianity's FOUNDATIONAL CLAIMS are, IN FACT, true. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO *KNOW*: 1. A Creator God exists. 2. A Supernatural exists. 3. An afterlife, in fact, does exist. 4. That the Bible IS, IN FACT, the "Word of God" as claimed. ALL of the rest is entirely dependent on those four FOUNDATIONAL CLAIMS being true and there is no way possible to demonstrate they are true and therefore IMPOSSIBLE to KNOW they are true either. The CLAIM that "Jesus is God!" is entirely dependent upon the most foundational claims that precede it. Until the foundational claims are demonstrated to be true "Jesus is God!" is nothing more than a baseless assertion.

The Abrahamic religions all absolutely reek of human invention and very, very, very reasonable doubt.

God, the supposed Creator of the Universe ... walked around camps? Complained about possibly stepping in shit and whose "Inspired" "Omniscient" instruction was bring a stick, dig a hole, shit in the hole and cover it up?!!! Talk about having mind-blowingly LOW EXPECTATIONS for what the INTELLECT of the Creator of the Universe would necessarily need to be!

The supposed Creator of the Universe believes witches exist and they should be murdered?!!! How stupid-on-purpose must one need to be to believe THAT?!!!

"God did it!" has ZERO explanatory power! HOW?! HOW did God do it?! By what mechanism? In what way? By what process? If you don't know ***HOW*** God did it, how can you possibly know ... THAT .... God did it?!

Blah ......Blah ....... Blah ...... Blaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh....... Meanwhile not a shred of VALID evidence Christianity is true. STILL waiting!

INARGUABLE FACT: Every Christian can say "I ... BELIEVE ... that Christianity is true.", but not one Christian can claim to ... KNOW ... that Christianity is, IN FACT, true. That's because there is NO WAY POSSIBLE to PROVE any of Christianity's FOUNDATIONAL CLAIMS are true. No Christian can possibly ... KNOW ... that a supernatural, in fact, exists, that an afterlife, IN FACT, exists, that the Bible is, IN FACT, the "Word of God" as claimed. You can believe those things are true all you want or need to, but the fact of the matter is, you don't and cannot KNOW they are true. And so the question is: IF Jesus is real, could he have possibly built Christianity upon a WEAKER and LESS CREDIBLE foundation?"