@Rodepo98
Account based inBelgium
About this account
- Account based in
- Belgium
- Connected via
- Belgium Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
what did he mean by this ?
United States
Joined July 2017
- Tweets12.4K
- Following561
- Followers62
- Likes121K
Pinned Tweet
Anyone who hasn't publicly denounced mass immigration from the third world is complicit of these crimes against humanity.
Not a single one of these cowards will even bother reading the horrors they have allowed.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
About 10,000 of the 60,000 Moroccan invaders are still in Ceuta two weeks later.
Look at the shanty towns they have built on the beach.
They are a plague.
🇪🇸 This is what Ceuta's beach looks like now that the dust has supposedly settled after the Spanish enclave was taken over by illegals 2 weeks ago.
The government said it would like to do something about the tents, but everything would have to be in accordance with an extraordinarily thick human rights manual.
Writer: Mhedi
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
As the father of three zoomer young men, I am very sympathetic to the concerns about affordability.
But the talk about burritos etc. is mostly misplaced.
What's gotten prohibitively expensive in recent decades is healthcare, education, and housing, not coincidentally three industries with
(1) Overwhelming amounts of government intervention.
(2) Huge distortionary effects from high levels of immigration.
Stop mass immigration and reduce government meddling in the economy, and young men will be able to afford all of the burritos (or burgers) they want to eat.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
We weren’t allowed to win the GWOT.
One of the main reasons that never gets talked about is our society’s belief in the blank slate theory. Thinking all people are equal leads to the assumption that nation building is possible, that simply gifting democracy to existing tribes somehow catapults them into the modern world. We wasted lives, resources, and time on a plan that, if we were intellectually honest, never had a chance of succeeding. Military occupation doesn’t change genetics, and our society’s irrational beliefs in the blank slate and equality set the stage for a plan that could only ever end in failure.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
This man wrote a book about using magic to extinguish the White race and how much better the world would be once we were gone.
"After a period of unrest, a kind of calm settles once the majority of the population in The Last White Man has darkened. At the end of the book, Hamid fast-forwards to a time when whiteness is a distant memory, inviting readers to imagine the possibility of a post-racial world."
Lovingly reviewed by Mia Levitan which she describes as "an obvious beach read, at a slim 180 pages of text, The Last White Man can be savoured in a single, thought-provoking sitting."
Yet if you so much as QUESTION why the have this bizarre almost sexual obsession with our eradication the shrieks are deafening.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
Absolument. Et quid de cette aberration et de ce gaslighting : alors que toute la société progressiste bien-pensante a développé une hyper-sensibilité aux effets des traumas et des circonstances sociales, on nous empêche, nous Français, d'avoir une quelconque réaction traumatique à 30 ans de barbarie islamique, et le penchant humain naturel qui pousse à développer une méfiance à l'égard d'eux nous est même refusé et est même considéré comme malsain, haineux et raciste.
La colère doit être réhabilitée.
C’est insupportable d’être perçu comme des tarés parce que nous sommes en colère.
La colère est une émotion qui fait partie du pack « instinct de survie » de l’être humain.
Les européens qui réalisent qu’ils sont en voie de disparition sont en colère, oui, et cela relève d’une pulsion de vie minimum.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
If a man sexually assaults a woman - not rape, just assault - he gets LIFE. His whole life destroyed. "Touching" her breasts in public will get you more prison time than a mother who murders her own children.
If a woman murders her kids, it's "postpartum psychosis." It's "she was overwhelmed." It's "she needs therapy."
grabbing a woman's breast in public carries more weight than murdering innocent children.
That tells you everything. Women's feelings are more valuable than children's lives. The future generation, helpless babies who can't fight back, are worth LESS than a woman's comfort.
Under the patriarchy, men never had this kind of power. A father who killed his kids was EXECUTED. A man who abandoned his family was shamed out of town. Men were held to the HIGHEST standard.
Now? Women have all the power to kill and walk free, and they call it equality.
Women who plead insanity are 50 percent more likely to be successful than men. A woman can murder her entire family then say she was depressed and the chances are high that she'll never spend a day in prison. This happens all the time. Andrea Yates drowned FIVE children in her bathtub and right now she's living in a comfortable, low security mental health facility. And she's only there because she wants to be. She's not an outlier, either. A woman was just found "not guilty by reason of insanity" a month ago after drowning her baby in a bathtub. The judge decided that she was suffering from temporary psychosis because of COVID or some such nonsense. Now Lindsay Clancy hopes to get the comfortable "mental health facility" treatment after strangling all of her children to death. And she may very well be successful. The darkest, most depraved manifestation of female privilege.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
The ultimate blackpill comes when one accepts that there is no saving the bottom 10% of society, and the goal of every ambitious and smart person is to become affluent enough to completely insulate themselves and their families away the permanent underclass.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
SHERMER: “Do you ever get any women in their second half of the second trimester or in the third trimester that say they have no medical problems—they just don't want the baby, or changed their mind? Would you do it?”
DR. HERN: “Of course. If the woman doesn't want to be pregnant, there's no justification for forcing her to continue the pregnancy.”
SHERMER: “Has that happened?”
DR. HERN: “It happens all the time. She has a potentially fatal condition that can kill her.”
SHERMER: “No, no. I mean, if she has no medical problems…”
DR. HERN: “The medical problem is that she's pregnant.”
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
The more money used to support immigrants in an area, the less safe the local inhabitants feel.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
The migrant scatter policy, or whatever Burnham is now calling it (rape devolution?) is so insane and apocalyptic that it’s hard to call anything else extreme.
Dumping rapists from Third World countries into English towns and villages is beyond Enoch Powell’s wildest nightmares.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
When it was a “White supremacist” nation they were a nuclear power with a space program and performed the first heart transplant…
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
Ian Smith noted this at the time that Britain was destroying Rhodesia: unlike every decolonized African country, Rhodesia was not corrupt, was well-governed, and was prosperous...because it had responsible government
"as Smith was apt to remark, there was more freedom in Rhodesia than anywhere in Black Africa. This was undoubtedly true, and indeed, Wilson was forced to appease some of the most brutal and disreputable men of his times. Rhodesia existed under the rule of law, without a whiff of corruption, and independence had been achieved without a single burning barricade, shot fired or drop of blood shed. With very few exceptions, this was not the case anywhere north of the Zambezi, but it did not matter. Under current democratic norms, it was the right of the majority to rule, and if that resulted inevitably in the looting and destruction of the nation, then so be it," as Peter Baxter notes in Rhodesia: A Complete History
African apologists will blame their woes on "corrupt leadership" yet the only uncorrupted functioning states (the white ruled ones) were destroyed by external and internal actors.
There are 54 African countries. They didnt all achieve independence at the same time, and some leaders lasted longer than others, but for arguments sake let's say they've been independent for 60 years, average leader in office for about ten years - thats over 300 leaders since independence.
The only black leader who was even remotely competent was Banda of Malawi. You can't try something 300 times and blame corruption every time the state falls apart. It's not going to work the 301st time you try.
The only time any of these places functioned was when they had white leaders.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
That’s because white poverty contradicts the mainstream narrative and throws a huge wrench into their standard class warfare rhetoric. So these people are just ignored by everyone and especially by all politicians on both sides.
A look into a "holler." The Appalachian demographic is 88% white. A gigantic, sprawling ghetto that composes a footprint of about 13ish states. The poverty rate averages out to approx 23% when excluding cities and metro areas that technically fall within those lines. Yet, somehow they are never the face of SNAP, WIC, Medicaid nor any other social safety net program.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
6 men to every woman.
Hang your heads in shame.
Women 'to be outnumbered six to one' after Labour floods illegal migrants onto tiny village's doorstep
gbnews.com/news/migrant-hous…
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
Sometimes I meet a tender quirked up foid and can tell just by her cranial measurements how upset she’d be if she knew my true beliefs and values. We are hitting it off having a lovely flirt envisioning a potential “I might finally get laid by this weirdo” situation but you would not like me gorgeous. No no no this isn’t what you think it is. She would not be happy. I can tell by the depth of squint wrinkle on her brow that she believes all men are created equal. She wouldn’t appreciate my stance on genetic differences at birth. I can tell by her maxilla width she thinks repeat criminals can be rehabilitated and are misunderstood. She’s an empath. Maybe it would be best if she didn’t know I want such scoundrels tortured on “The Torture Channel™️” which is mandatory viewing for all citizens for at least 1 hour per week. It really is an internal struggle. She’s shared nothing with me about her beliefs and yet I know everything. I know she doesn’t think weeping immigrant children being detained by federal agents is funny. But is that really my business? Does that make me a bad guy for continuing to pursue her? My vision refocuses and I return back to reality at the aquarium gift shop. The tattooless redhead cashier with thin nostrils is staring at me impatiently. How long had I zoned out? How long had I drifted away? I attempt to pick up where I infer I’d left off and ask when she gets off. She doesn’t reply. I say something like “don’t worry I’m white I’m not gonna rape you haha” and she becomes very upset and I’m made to leave the premises without being allowed to purchase my poster of echinoderms. I’m made to be the villain somehow. Should have known she’d react this way. Dumb bitch had attached earlobes. Should’ve seen this coming
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
We are worried these men will rape, so let's give them an underclass of women it's acceptable to rape.
This is why they pretended the grooming gangs weren't happening, they thought working class girls were an acceptable group to absorb the violence.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
It’s funny how wokes will be all like “diversity is our strength” and then in the next sentence be like “Muslim migration is cosmic revenge against the West for colonialism.”
Which is it guys?
Is diversity our strength or is it karmic revenge?
Please get back to us.
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
Western women have won nearly every political battle over the last century, and yet they seemingly feel worse than ever compared to men. Social scientists have no good explanation why.
My theory is that people high in empathization and low in systemization tend to unknowingly pursue multiple desires incompatible with one another, as well as unique desires incompatible with their own persistence. Optimizing for women's incompatible desires thus creates frustration and unfulfillment in women.
An example of desires incompatible with one another is women's marital and political preferences. Women tend to be attracted to men of equal or higher socioeconomic status, while they tend to vote for income equality. The result is too few eligible men, dissatisfaction with the male dating pool, and lower-than-ever coupling rates.
An example of a desire incompatible with its own persistence is the desire for social liberalism. Western women want to feel kind and consistently vote for liberal parties that orchestrate mass immigration from illiberal cultures. They then denounce the rise of masculinist figures such as Andrew Tate, a man much more popular among non-Whites, a man whose audience they voted to bring into their country.
This is the best theory I could think of. What's yours?
what did he mean by this ? retweeted
It really needs to be emphasised that this particular type of crime - a woman being physically held down and raped by two total strangers in a public place - exists in the west almost exclusively thanks to third world immigration.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more